You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 23, 2024

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR MAGNESIUM SULFATE; POTASSIUM CHLORIDE; SODIUM SULFATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for MAGNESIUM SULFATE; POTASSIUM CHLORIDE; SODIUM SULFATE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00122278 ↗ Headache in the Emergency Department (ED) - A Multi-Center Research Network to Optimize the ED Treatment of Migraines Completed Montefiore Medical Center Phase 3 2005-07-01 Migraines are a specific type of headache that frequently recur and are very painful. Although there are many medications that are effective against migraines, none of these medications cure 100% of migraines. Another problem with migraines is that although many times they get better after intravenous (IV) treatment in the emergency room (ER), about 1/3 of the time migraines recur the next day. The purpose of this research project is to see if adding a medication called dexamethasone to standard ER therapy will help patients get better quicker and stay pain-free more often than if they receive placebo.
NCT00137501 ↗ Two Dose Regimens of Nifedipine for the Management of Preterm Labor Terminated American University of Beirut Medical Center Phase 3 2003-05-01 Preterm birth is one of the most important causes of perinatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Prevention and treatment of preterm labor is important, not as an end in itself, but as a means of reducing adverse events for the neonate. A wide range of tocolytics, drugs used to suppress uterine contractions, have been tried. Magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) is the most widely used tocolytic at the American University of Beirut Medical Center despite the fact that an effective tocolytic role of MgSO4 has never been established. Moreover, the currently available data are suggestive of deleterious fetal effects of MgSO4 in the setting of preterm labor to the extent that some authorities are recommending abandoning it for routine use as a tocolytic therapy. Calcium channel blockers have the ability to inhibit contractility in smooth muscle cells. Consequently, nifedipine has emerged as an effective and rather safe alternative tocolytic agent for the management of preterm labor after several studies have shown that the use of nifedipine in comparison with other tocolytics is associated with a more frequent successful prolongation of pregnancy, resulting in significantly fewer admissions of newborns to the neonatal intensive care unit, and is associated with a lower incidence of respiratory distress syndrome. The unequivocal impact of this method of tocolysis on short term postponement of delivery and the opportunity that this provides for affecting in-utero transfer and steroid administration has prompted many investigators to recommend focusing future trials on testing different dose regimens of nifedipine. To the best of the investigators' knowledge, no study comparing two different dose regimens of nifedipine has been previously published in the literature. The objective of their study is to compare the effectiveness of a high versus a low dose regimen in a total of 200 patients admitted with the diagnosis of preterm labor between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation. In addition, the investigators' study will try to assess the safety profile of the 2 dose regimens on the mother and the neonate by assessing a selected number of outcome variables. The data generated will be used to change their protocol for managing patients presenting with threatened preterm delivery and will fill the existing gap regarding the most effective and safest dose regimen of nifedipine in such patients.
NCT00458003 ↗ Phenylephrine in Spinal Anesthesia in Preeclamptic Patients Completed Northwestern University N/A 2006-07-01 Hypotension remains a common clinical problem after induction of spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Maternal hypotension has been associated with considerable morbidity (maternal nausea and vomiting and fetal/neonatal acidemia). Traditionally, ephedrine has been the vasopressor of choice because of concerns about phenylephrine's potential adverse effect on uterine blood flow. This practice was based on animal studies which showed that ephedrine maintained cardiac output and uterine blood flow, while direct acting vasoconstrictors, e.g., phenylephrine, decreased uteroplacental perfusion. However, several recent studies have demonstrated that phenylephrine has similar efficacy to ephedrine for preventing and treating hypotension and may be associated with a lower incidence of fetal acidosis. All of these studies have been performed in healthy patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery. Preeclampsia complicates 5-6% of all pregnancies and is a significant contributor to maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. Many preeclamptic patients require cesarean delivery of the infant. These patients often have uteroplacental insufficiency. Given the potential for significant hypotension after spinal anesthesia and its effect on an already compromised fetus, prevention of (relative) hypotension in preeclamptic patients is important. Spinal anesthesia in preeclamptic patients has been shown to have no adverse neonatal outcomes as compared to epidural anesthesia when hypotension is treated adequately. Due to problems related to management of the difficult airway and coagulopathy, both of which are more common in preeclamptic women, spinal anesthesia may be the preferred regional anesthesia technique. Recent studies have demonstrated that preeclamptic patients may experience less hypotension after spinal anesthesia than their healthy counterparts. To our knowledge, phenylephrine for the treatment of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension has not been studied in women with preeclampsia. The aim of our study is to compare intravenous infusion regimens of phenylephrine versus ephedrine for the treatment of spinal anesthesia induced hypotension in preeclamptic patients undergoing cesarean delivery. The primary outcome variable is umbilical artery pH.
NCT01918514 ↗ The Effect of Adding Magnesium Sulfate to Standard Epidural and Interscalene Block in Treatment of Patients With Chronic Pain No longer available State University of New York - Upstate Medical University 1969-12-31 Regional anesthesia is a safe, inexpensive technique, with the advantage of prolonged pain relief. In the pain clinic the investigators perform different injections as the standard treatment for chronic pain based on the diagnosis and indications. Local anesthetic like Bupivacaine with or without Steroids (Depo-medrol) is used for these injections. The investigators' goal is comparing pain control in different groups adding the magnesium sulfate 100mg to our compounds as an inexpensive, effective, and safe adjuvant to prolong the duration of analgesia and reduce the amount of narcotic dose.
NCT01928082 ↗ The Effects of Estrogen Replacement Therapy in Postmenopausal Women With Hypercalciuria and Low Bone Mass Terminated University of Chicago Phase 2 2013-08-01 The purpose of this study is to assess if estrogen replacement normalizes urinary calcium excretion in postmenopausal women with hypercalciuria and low bone mass and to assess for differences in response to estrogen replacement in women with familial hypercalciuria compared to nonfamilial hypercalciuria.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for MAGNESIUM SULFATE; POTASSIUM CHLORIDE; SODIUM SULFATE

Condition Name

Condition Name for MAGNESIUM SULFATE; POTASSIUM CHLORIDE; SODIUM SULFATE
Intervention Trials
Colonoscopy 2
Opioid Free Anesthesia 1
Bowel Disease 1
Systemic Sclerosis 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for MAGNESIUM SULFATE; POTASSIUM CHLORIDE; SODIUM SULFATE
Intervention Trials
Pain, Postoperative 2
Pre-Eclampsia 2
Eclampsia 1
Osteoporosis 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for MAGNESIUM SULFATE; POTASSIUM CHLORIDE; SODIUM SULFATE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for MAGNESIUM SULFATE; POTASSIUM CHLORIDE; SODIUM SULFATE
Location Trials
United States 10
Egypt 6
China 3
Russian Federation 1
Lebanon 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for MAGNESIUM SULFATE; POTASSIUM CHLORIDE; SODIUM SULFATE
Location Trials
California 2
Illinois 2
New York 2
Utah 1
Iowa 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for MAGNESIUM SULFATE; POTASSIUM CHLORIDE; SODIUM SULFATE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for MAGNESIUM SULFATE; POTASSIUM CHLORIDE; SODIUM SULFATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 4
Phase 3 5
Phase 2/Phase 3 2
[disabled in preview] 13
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for MAGNESIUM SULFATE; POTASSIUM CHLORIDE; SODIUM SULFATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Not yet recruiting 8
Completed 8
Recruiting 5
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for MAGNESIUM SULFATE; POTASSIUM CHLORIDE; SODIUM SULFATE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for MAGNESIUM SULFATE; POTASSIUM CHLORIDE; SODIUM SULFATE
Sponsor Trials
Ain Shams University 2
Fayoum University Hospital 2
Hebei Provincial People's Hospital 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for MAGNESIUM SULFATE; POTASSIUM CHLORIDE; SODIUM SULFATE
Sponsor Trials
Other 44
Industry 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.