CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR PRAVASTATIN SODIUM
✉ Email this page to a colleague
All Clinical Trials for PRAVASTATIN SODIUM
Trial ID | Title | Status | Sponsor | Phase | Start Date | Summary |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NCT00000941 ↗ | A Study on Possible Interactions Between Protease Inhibitors (Anti-HIV Drugs) and Drugs Which Lower the Level of Fat in Your Blood | Completed | National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) | Phase 1 | 1969-12-31 | The purpose of this study is to find out whether taking protease inhibitors (anti-HIV drugs) together with lipid-lowering drugs (drugs which lower the amount of fat in the blood) has an effect on the level of drugs found in the blood compared to when these drugs are taken separately. The three protease inhibitors given in this study are ritonavir, saquinavir, and nelfinavir. The lipid-lowering drugs given are pravastatin, simvastatin, and atorvastatin. Anti-HIV drug therapy using protease inhibitors has become very common treatment for HIV-positive patients. Recently, however, serious side effects involving how the body uses fat have been reported in people taking protease inhibitors. Examples of these side effects are redistribution of body fat and development of diabetes. People taking protease inhibitors have been found to have higher levels of fat in their blood than is normal, which can cause heart problems. It is hoped that giving lipid-lowering drugs can help prevent serious heart problems. First, however, it is important to see what happens when protease inhibitors and lipid-lowering drugs are given together. |
NCT00006412 ↗ | Safety and Effectiveness of Fenofibrate and Pravastatin in HIV-Positive Patients With Abnormal Blood Lipids | Completed | National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) | Phase 3 | 1969-12-31 | The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of fenofibrate and pravastatin in treating HIV-positive patients who have abnormal levels of fat (lipids) in the blood. Increased lipids in the blood associated with HIV infection and anti-HIV drugs is a growing problem. The drugs used in this study are known to reduce certain lipids, but little is known about their safety and effectiveness. This study will see if one of the drugs is safer and more effective than the other, or if combining the drugs is the safest and most effective way to lower lipids. This study has been changed. On June 26, 2001, this study was reviewed by the Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB). The DSMB is an independent board monitoring the progress of the study. The review showed that neither pravastatin nor fenofibrate alone were effective in reaching all the cholesterol and triglyceride goals. There were no safety concerns. It is not known if the combination of fenofibrate and pravastatin is effective and safe. Therefore, it is important to continue this study. |
NCT00017758 ↗ | The Effect of Efavirenz and Nelfinavir on the Blood Levels of Certain Lipid-Lowering Drugs | Completed | National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) | Phase 1 | 1969-12-31 | The purpose of this study is to find out whether certain anti-HIV drugs (efavirenz [EFV] and nelfinavir [NFV]) affect the amount of certain fat-lowering drugs (atorvastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin) in the blood. Protease inhibitors (PIs), a type of anti-HIV drug, are known to cause increased lipids (fats) in the blood of HIV-infected patients. EFV also is known to increase blood fats. HIV-infected patients who take PIs and/or EFV may need to take fat-lowering drugs to correct this problem. So it is important to look at possible drug interactions when these drugs are taken together. This study will see if taking EFV or NFV, a protease inhibitor, affects the blood level of simvastatin, atorvastatin, or pravastatin (all fat-lowering drugs). To obtain results more quickly, the study population will be healthy HIV-negative volunteers. |
NCT00039663 ↗ | Endothelial Dysfunction as a Risk Factor in HIV Study | Completed | National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC) | Phase 1 | 2002-05-01 | Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has proven effective in altering the natural history of HIV infection in many patients. However, this therapy may not be sustainable because of the toxicities of the medications. Evidence suggests that HIV-infected patients on HAART may be at risk for premature coronary artery disease. The exact cause is unknown. It is possible that the medications directly affect the endothelium (the lining of the arteries that supply blood to the heart) and lead to premature heart disease. Or because the medications cause lipid abnormalities (high cholesterol) and a condition of relative insulin resistance, in which the body has a difficult time processing sugars; known risk factors for endothelial dysfunction and heart disease. Therapeutic intervention that reverses these lipid abnormalities and/or insulin resistance may lower these risk factors, normalize endothelial function, and decrease the risk of heart disease. This protocol aims to assess endothelial function among a group of HIV-infected patients with varying degrees of viral activity and levels of immune function on a variety of HAART regimens. It also aims to evaluate the effect of three different medications on lipids, insulin resistance, and thus endothelial function. Understanding the factors involved in causing endothelial dysfunction will help better characterize the relative risks and benefits of early versus late and continuous versus intermittent HAART therapy. The research may offer some insights into the causes of premature heart disease among HIV-infected patients on HAART that could be more thoroughly investigated in subsequent clinical trials. A total of 75 patients will be recruited: 25 for each arm of the study. Each arm evaluates the potential benefit of a particular medication and will enroll sequentially. An endothelial function test will be performed on an outpatient basis. The first 25 patients will be assigned at random to receive pravastatin sodium or placebo; the next 25 will receive gemfibrozil or placebo; the final 25 will receive rosiglitazone or placebo. Patients will take the pills for 6 weeks, no pills for the next 4 weeks, and then the opposite treatment for 6 more weeks. Two weeks after the start of the study drug, blood will be taken to check for potential toxic side effects. After each 6-week treatment, blood will be drawn and endothelial function tests will be performed. |
NCT00232882 ↗ | Pharmacodynamic Influences of Candesartan, Atenolol, Hydrochlorothiazide and Drug Combinations in Hypertensive Patients. | Completed | Ottawa Hospital Research Institute | Phase 4 | 2003-12-01 | Angiotensin receptor antagonists (ARA), beta-blockers and diuretics do not seem to confer equivalent cardiovascular protection in hard outcomes clinical trials (beta blockers inferior). These results may be explained by differences in their effects on sympathetic activity, oxidative stress, inflammation and renin angiotensin system activation. How diuretic addition to first line therapy with ARAs and beta-blockers modulates neurohumoral and hemodynamic parameters is not well understood. The main hypothesis of this study is that an ARA (candesartan) combined or not with a diuretic will not increase sympathetic activity as much as a beta blocker (atenolol). Secondary hypothesis are of similar nature but relate to hemodynamic parameters, oxidative stress markers, inflammatory markers, or the renin angiotensin system. The main objective of this study is to assess and compare the effects of candesartan and atenolol and their combination with low dose diuretic therapy on the autonomic nervous system, hemodynamic parameters,on oxidative stress, on inflammatory markers, and on the renin-angiotensin system. Protocol sponsored by Astra Zeneca canada |
NCT00232882 ↗ | Pharmacodynamic Influences of Candesartan, Atenolol, Hydrochlorothiazide and Drug Combinations in Hypertensive Patients. | Completed | Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montreal | Phase 4 | 2003-12-01 | Angiotensin receptor antagonists (ARA), beta-blockers and diuretics do not seem to confer equivalent cardiovascular protection in hard outcomes clinical trials (beta blockers inferior). These results may be explained by differences in their effects on sympathetic activity, oxidative stress, inflammation and renin angiotensin system activation. How diuretic addition to first line therapy with ARAs and beta-blockers modulates neurohumoral and hemodynamic parameters is not well understood. The main hypothesis of this study is that an ARA (candesartan) combined or not with a diuretic will not increase sympathetic activity as much as a beta blocker (atenolol). Secondary hypothesis are of similar nature but relate to hemodynamic parameters, oxidative stress markers, inflammatory markers, or the renin angiotensin system. The main objective of this study is to assess and compare the effects of candesartan and atenolol and their combination with low dose diuretic therapy on the autonomic nervous system, hemodynamic parameters,on oxidative stress, on inflammatory markers, and on the renin-angiotensin system. Protocol sponsored by Astra Zeneca canada |
NCT00307307 ↗ | Carotid Atherosclerosis Regression at Magnetic Resonance Assessment. | Completed | Kos Pharmaceuticals | Phase 4 | 2000-01-01 | The primary objective of this randomized, double blind, placebo controlled pilot study is to determine if therapies aimed at lowering LDL cholesterol (HMGCoA reductase inhibitor - simvastatin) or increasing HDL cholesterol (Niaspan) will induce regression of carotid atherosclerotic plaque in vivo using MRI imaging techniques. MR plaque morphology at baseline will be compared to that after 6 and 12 months of therapy and changes in MR characteristics will be compared to changes in lipoprotein parameters and urinary isoprostanes. The effect of moderate LDL reduction, aggressive LDL reduction and the combination of aggressive LDL reduction and HDL elevation on MRI plaque characteristics will be compared by randomly assigning subjects (n=69) with carotid disease (>30% stenosis by ultrasound criteria) to one of three treatment arms; 1. Simvastatin 20 mg daily and placebo Niaspan (n=23) 2. Simvastatin 80 mg daily and placebo Niaspan (n=23) 3. Simvastatin 20 mg daily and active Niaspan (n=23) Treatment group 2 and 3 will have roughly equivalent LDL lowering because of the synergistic LDL lowering effect of the combination of simvastatin and Niaspan. |
>Trial ID | >Title | >Status | >Sponsor | >Phase | >Start Date | >Summary |
Clinical Trial Conditions for PRAVASTATIN SODIUM
Condition Name
Condition Name for PRAVASTATIN SODIUM | |
Intervention | Trials |
Healthy | 6 |
HIV Infections | 4 |
Adult Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia Without Maturation (M1) | 2 |
Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia With 11q23 (MLL) Abnormalities | 2 |
[disabled in preview] | 0 |
This preview shows a limited data set Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial |
Clinical Trial Locations for PRAVASTATIN SODIUM
Trials by Country
Clinical Trial Progress for PRAVASTATIN SODIUM
Clinical Trial Phase
Clinical Trial Sponsors for PRAVASTATIN SODIUM
Sponsor Name