You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: November 5, 2024

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR RIFAMPIN AND ISONIAZID


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for RIFAMPIN AND ISONIAZID

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000636 ↗ Prophylaxis Against Tuberculosis (TB) in Patients With Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Infection and Confirmed Latent Tuberculous Infection Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) N/A 1969-12-31 To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of a 2-month regimen of rifampin and pyrazinamide versus a 1-year course of isoniazid (INH) to prevent the development of tuberculosis in patients who are coinfected with HIV and latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTb). Current guidelines recommend 6 to 12 months of treatment with INH for purified protein derivative (PPD)-positive individuals. Problems with this treatment include compliance, adverse reaction, and the possibility of not preventing disease due to INH-resistant organisms. Studies suggest that two or three months of rifampin and pyrazinamide may be more effective than longer courses of INH. A two-month prevention course should help to increase compliance. In addition, the use of two drugs (rifampin and pyrazinamide) may help overcome problems with drug resistance.
NCT00000638 ↗ Preventive Treatment Against Tuberculosis (TB) in Patients With Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Infection and Confirmed Latent Tuberculous Infection Completed Hoechst Marion Roussel N/A 1969-12-31 To evaluate and compare the safety and effectiveness of a one-year course of isoniazid (INH) versus a two-month course of rifampin plus pyrazinamide for the prevention of reactivation tuberculosis in individuals infected with both HIV and latent (inactive) Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Current guidelines from the American Thoracic Society and the Centers for Disease Control recommend 6 to 12 months of INH for PPD (purified protein derivative)-positive individuals. Although the effectiveness of this treatment is not known for HIV-infected individuals, several studies using INH to prevent tuberculosis in presumably normal hosts have shown 60 to 80 percent effectiveness. Problems with this treatment include compliance, adverse reaction, and the possibility of not preventing disease due to tuberculosis organisms being resistant to INH. A two-month preventive treatment plan should help in increasing compliance. In addition, the use of two drugs (rifampin / pyrazinamide) may help overcome problems with drug resistance. If this study shows equal or greater effectiveness of the two-month rifampin / pyrazinamide treatment, it could alter the approach to tuberculosis prevention for both HIV-positive and HIV-negative individuals.
NCT00000638 ↗ Preventive Treatment Against Tuberculosis (TB) in Patients With Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Infection and Confirmed Latent Tuberculous Infection Completed Lederle Laboratories N/A 1969-12-31 To evaluate and compare the safety and effectiveness of a one-year course of isoniazid (INH) versus a two-month course of rifampin plus pyrazinamide for the prevention of reactivation tuberculosis in individuals infected with both HIV and latent (inactive) Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Current guidelines from the American Thoracic Society and the Centers for Disease Control recommend 6 to 12 months of INH for PPD (purified protein derivative)-positive individuals. Although the effectiveness of this treatment is not known for HIV-infected individuals, several studies using INH to prevent tuberculosis in presumably normal hosts have shown 60 to 80 percent effectiveness. Problems with this treatment include compliance, adverse reaction, and the possibility of not preventing disease due to tuberculosis organisms being resistant to INH. A two-month preventive treatment plan should help in increasing compliance. In addition, the use of two drugs (rifampin / pyrazinamide) may help overcome problems with drug resistance. If this study shows equal or greater effectiveness of the two-month rifampin / pyrazinamide treatment, it could alter the approach to tuberculosis prevention for both HIV-positive and HIV-negative individuals.
NCT00000638 ↗ Preventive Treatment Against Tuberculosis (TB) in Patients With Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Infection and Confirmed Latent Tuberculous Infection Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) N/A 1969-12-31 To evaluate and compare the safety and effectiveness of a one-year course of isoniazid (INH) versus a two-month course of rifampin plus pyrazinamide for the prevention of reactivation tuberculosis in individuals infected with both HIV and latent (inactive) Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Current guidelines from the American Thoracic Society and the Centers for Disease Control recommend 6 to 12 months of INH for PPD (purified protein derivative)-positive individuals. Although the effectiveness of this treatment is not known for HIV-infected individuals, several studies using INH to prevent tuberculosis in presumably normal hosts have shown 60 to 80 percent effectiveness. Problems with this treatment include compliance, adverse reaction, and the possibility of not preventing disease due to tuberculosis organisms being resistant to INH. A two-month preventive treatment plan should help in increasing compliance. In addition, the use of two drugs (rifampin / pyrazinamide) may help overcome problems with drug resistance. If this study shows equal or greater effectiveness of the two-month rifampin / pyrazinamide treatment, it could alter the approach to tuberculosis prevention for both HIV-positive and HIV-negative individuals.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for RIFAMPIN AND ISONIAZID

Condition Name

Condition Name for RIFAMPIN AND ISONIAZID
Intervention Trials
Tuberculosis 28
HIV Infections 8
Tuberculosis, Pulmonary 7
Pulmonary Tuberculosis 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for RIFAMPIN AND ISONIAZID
Intervention Trials
Tuberculosis 50
Tuberculosis, Pulmonary 19
Infections 9
Infection 9
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for RIFAMPIN AND ISONIAZID

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for RIFAMPIN AND ISONIAZID
Location Trials
United States 141
China 40
Canada 22
South Africa 19
Brazil 13
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for RIFAMPIN AND ISONIAZID
Location Trials
New York 13
California 13
Texas 11
Maryland 9
Illinois 9
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for RIFAMPIN AND ISONIAZID

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for RIFAMPIN AND ISONIAZID
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 11
Phase 3 15
Phase 2/Phase 3 2
[disabled in preview] 14
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for RIFAMPIN AND ISONIAZID
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 31
Not yet recruiting 6
Recruiting 5
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for RIFAMPIN AND ISONIAZID

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for RIFAMPIN AND ISONIAZID
Sponsor Trials
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 10
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 10
National Taiwan University Hospital 4
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for RIFAMPIN AND ISONIAZID
Sponsor Trials
Other 126
U.S. Fed 16
Industry 12
[disabled in preview] 11
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.