You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 17, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR RIMACTANE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for RIMACTANE

Trial IDTitleStatusSponsorPhaseStart DateSummary
NCT01218620 ↗ Gamma-Secretase/Notch Signalling Pathway Inhibitor RO4929097 in Treating Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 1 2010-09-01 This randomized phase I trial studies the side effects and best dose of RO4929097 in treating patients with advanced solid tumors. RO4929097 may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth.
NCT00621309 ↗ Sulforaphane as an Antagonist to Human PXR-mediated Drug-drug Interactions Completed Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Phase 1 2008-03-01 Adverse drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are responsible for approximately 3% of all hospitalizations in the US, perhaps costing more than $1.3 billion per year. One of the most common causes of DDIs is the when one drug alters the metabolism of another. A key enzyme in the liver and intestine, called "cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) is generally considered to be the most important drug metabolizing enzyme. The gene for CYP3A4 can be 'turned on' by the presence of certain other drugs, resulting in much higher levels of CYP3A4 in the liver and intestine. Thus, when a drug that induces CYP3A4 is given with or before another drug that is metabolized by 3A4, a 'drug-drug' interaction occurs because the first drug (the inducer) greatly changes the rate at which the second drug (CYP3A4 substrate) is removed from the body. Many drugs increase CYP3A4 activity by binding to a receptor called the Pregnane-X-Receptor (PXR), which is a major switch that controls the expression of the CYP3A4 gene. Using human liver cells we have demonstrated that sulforaphane (SFN), found in broccoli, can block drugs from activating the PXR receptor, thereby inhibiting the switch that causes CYP3A4 induction. The purpose of this project is to determine if SFN can be used to block adverse DDIs that occur when drugs bind to and activate the PXR receptor and subsequently induce CYP3A4 activity. We will recruit 24 human volunteers to participate in the study. This project will determine whether SFN can prevent the drug Rifampin from binding to PXR and increasing CYP3A4 activity in humans following oral administration of SFN (broccoli sprout extract). The rate of removal of a small dose of the drug midazolam will be used to determine the enzymatic activity of CYP3A4 before and following treatment with Rifampin, in the presence or absence of SFN, since midazolam is only eliminated from the bloodstream by CYP3A4. . We predict that SFN will prevent the increase in midazolam clearance (metabolism) that normally follows treatment with the antibiotic, rifampicin. This research is important because it could potentially lead to a simple, cost-effective way of preventing one of the most common causes of adverse drug-drug interactions that occurs today. For example, rifampicin, which is a cheap and effective antibiotic used to treat TB, cannot be used in HIV/AIDS patients because it increases the metabolism of many of the antiretroviral drugs used to treat HIV/AIDS. TB is a major opportunistic infection in AIDS patients, so this is a serious clinical problem, especially in developing countries where more expensive alternative drug therapies are not available. We hypothesize that co-formulation of rifampicin with SFN could block this drug-drug interaction without altering its efficacy, thereby allowing its use in HIV/AIDS patients infected with TB. This is but one example of numerous drug-drug interactions that occur via this mechanism.
NCT00621309 ↗ Sulforaphane as an Antagonist to Human PXR-mediated Drug-drug Interactions Completed National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) Phase 1 2008-03-01 Adverse drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are responsible for approximately 3% of all hospitalizations in the US, perhaps costing more than $1.3 billion per year. One of the most common causes of DDIs is the when one drug alters the metabolism of another. A key enzyme in the liver and intestine, called "cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) is generally considered to be the most important drug metabolizing enzyme. The gene for CYP3A4 can be 'turned on' by the presence of certain other drugs, resulting in much higher levels of CYP3A4 in the liver and intestine. Thus, when a drug that induces CYP3A4 is given with or before another drug that is metabolized by 3A4, a 'drug-drug' interaction occurs because the first drug (the inducer) greatly changes the rate at which the second drug (CYP3A4 substrate) is removed from the body. Many drugs increase CYP3A4 activity by binding to a receptor called the Pregnane-X-Receptor (PXR), which is a major switch that controls the expression of the CYP3A4 gene. Using human liver cells we have demonstrated that sulforaphane (SFN), found in broccoli, can block drugs from activating the PXR receptor, thereby inhibiting the switch that causes CYP3A4 induction. The purpose of this project is to determine if SFN can be used to block adverse DDIs that occur when drugs bind to and activate the PXR receptor and subsequently induce CYP3A4 activity. We will recruit 24 human volunteers to participate in the study. This project will determine whether SFN can prevent the drug Rifampin from binding to PXR and increasing CYP3A4 activity in humans following oral administration of SFN (broccoli sprout extract). The rate of removal of a small dose of the drug midazolam will be used to determine the enzymatic activity of CYP3A4 before and following treatment with Rifampin, in the presence or absence of SFN, since midazolam is only eliminated from the bloodstream by CYP3A4. . We predict that SFN will prevent the increase in midazolam clearance (metabolism) that normally follows treatment with the antibiotic, rifampicin. This research is important because it could potentially lead to a simple, cost-effective way of preventing one of the most common causes of adverse drug-drug interactions that occurs today. For example, rifampicin, which is a cheap and effective antibiotic used to treat TB, cannot be used in HIV/AIDS patients because it increases the metabolism of many of the antiretroviral drugs used to treat HIV/AIDS. TB is a major opportunistic infection in AIDS patients, so this is a serious clinical problem, especially in developing countries where more expensive alternative drug therapies are not available. We hypothesize that co-formulation of rifampicin with SFN could block this drug-drug interaction without altering its efficacy, thereby allowing its use in HIV/AIDS patients infected with TB. This is but one example of numerous drug-drug interactions that occur via this mechanism.
NCT00621309 ↗ Sulforaphane as an Antagonist to Human PXR-mediated Drug-drug Interactions Completed University of Washington Phase 1 2008-03-01 Adverse drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are responsible for approximately 3% of all hospitalizations in the US, perhaps costing more than $1.3 billion per year. One of the most common causes of DDIs is the when one drug alters the metabolism of another. A key enzyme in the liver and intestine, called "cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) is generally considered to be the most important drug metabolizing enzyme. The gene for CYP3A4 can be 'turned on' by the presence of certain other drugs, resulting in much higher levels of CYP3A4 in the liver and intestine. Thus, when a drug that induces CYP3A4 is given with or before another drug that is metabolized by 3A4, a 'drug-drug' interaction occurs because the first drug (the inducer) greatly changes the rate at which the second drug (CYP3A4 substrate) is removed from the body. Many drugs increase CYP3A4 activity by binding to a receptor called the Pregnane-X-Receptor (PXR), which is a major switch that controls the expression of the CYP3A4 gene. Using human liver cells we have demonstrated that sulforaphane (SFN), found in broccoli, can block drugs from activating the PXR receptor, thereby inhibiting the switch that causes CYP3A4 induction. The purpose of this project is to determine if SFN can be used to block adverse DDIs that occur when drugs bind to and activate the PXR receptor and subsequently induce CYP3A4 activity. We will recruit 24 human volunteers to participate in the study. This project will determine whether SFN can prevent the drug Rifampin from binding to PXR and increasing CYP3A4 activity in humans following oral administration of SFN (broccoli sprout extract). The rate of removal of a small dose of the drug midazolam will be used to determine the enzymatic activity of CYP3A4 before and following treatment with Rifampin, in the presence or absence of SFN, since midazolam is only eliminated from the bloodstream by CYP3A4. . We predict that SFN will prevent the increase in midazolam clearance (metabolism) that normally follows treatment with the antibiotic, rifampicin. This research is important because it could potentially lead to a simple, cost-effective way of preventing one of the most common causes of adverse drug-drug interactions that occurs today. For example, rifampicin, which is a cheap and effective antibiotic used to treat TB, cannot be used in HIV/AIDS patients because it increases the metabolism of many of the antiretroviral drugs used to treat HIV/AIDS. TB is a major opportunistic infection in AIDS patients, so this is a serious clinical problem, especially in developing countries where more expensive alternative drug therapies are not available. We hypothesize that co-formulation of rifampicin with SFN could block this drug-drug interaction without altering its efficacy, thereby allowing its use in HIV/AIDS patients infected with TB. This is but one example of numerous drug-drug interactions that occur via this mechanism.
>Trial ID>Title>Status>Phase>Start Date>Summary
Showing 1 to 4 of 4 entries

Clinical Trial Conditions for RIMACTANE

Condition Name

21110-0.200.20.40.60.811.21.41.61.822.2TuberculosisMultiple System AtrophyAdvanced MalignanciesNon-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL)[disabled in preview]
Condition Name for RIMACTANE
Intervention Trials
Tuberculosis 2
Multiple System Atrophy 1
Advanced Malignancies 1
Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

3111000.511.522.53TuberculosisLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseSarcoma, SynovialAtrophy[disabled in preview]
Condition MeSH for RIMACTANE
Intervention Trials
Tuberculosis 3
Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse 1
Sarcoma, Synovial 1
Atrophy 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for RIMACTANE

Trials by Country

+
Trials by Country for RIMACTANE
Location Trials
United States 15
South Africa 2
Philippines 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

+
Trials by US State for RIMACTANE
Location Trials
California 2
Texas 2
Michigan 2
Florida 1
Wisconsin 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for RIMACTANE

Clinical Trial Phase

28.6%71.4%0-0.500.511.522.533.544.555.5Phase 3Phase 1[disabled in preview]
Clinical Trial Phase for RIMACTANE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 3 2
Phase 1 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

57.1%14.3%14.3%14.3%011.522.533.54CompletedNot yet recruitingRecruiting[disabled in preview]
Clinical Trial Status for RIMACTANE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 4
Not yet recruiting 1
Recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for RIMACTANE

Sponsor Name

trials000111112222University of Cape TownEpizyme, Inc.Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center[disabled in preview]
Sponsor Name for RIMACTANE
Sponsor Trials
University of Cape Town 2
Epizyme, Inc. 1
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

58.3%25.0%16.7%001234567OtherNIHIndustry[disabled in preview]
Sponsor Type for RIMACTANE
Sponsor Trials
Other 7
NIH 3
Industry 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials, Market Analysis, and Projections for Rifampicin (Rimactane)

Introduction to Rifampicin (Rimactane)

Rifampicin, commonly known by the brand name Rimactane, is a broad-spectrum antimicrobial drug primarily used in the treatment of tuberculosis (TB) and to eliminate asymptomatic carriers of Neisseria meningitidis. It was first discovered in 1965 and has been clinically used since 1968[5].

Recent Clinical Trials

TBTC Study 31/ACTG A5349

One of the most significant recent clinical trials involving rifampicin is TBTC Study 31, also known as ACTG A5349. This phase 3, open-label randomized controlled clinical trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of two four-month treatment regimens for drug-susceptible pulmonary TB. The study compared a regimen containing high-dose rifapentine with or without moxifloxacin to the standard six-month regimen of rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol. The results showed that the four-month regimen including high-dose rifapentine, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and moxifloxacin was non-inferior in efficacy to the standard six-month regimen and was safe and well-tolerated by patients[1][4].

CRUSH-TB/Study 38

Another ongoing trial, CRUSH-TB (Combination Regimens for Shortening Tuberculosis Treatment)/Study 38, is a phase 2C trial that aims to assess the efficacy and safety of several new 4-month regimens based on novel agents, including bedaquiline, moxifloxacin, and pyrazinamide, compared to the standard 6-month regimen for TB disease[4].

ASTERoidD/Study 37

The ASTERoidD (Assessment of the Safety, Tolerability, and Effectiveness of Rifapentine Given Daily for Latent TB Infection)/TBTC Study 37 is an open-label, multi-center, phase 3 randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. This study compares the safety and effectiveness of a 6-week regimen of daily rifapentine against the current standard of 12-16 weeks of rifamycin-based treatment for latent TB infection[4].

Market Analysis

Global Rifampicin Market

The global rifampicin market is part of the broader antibiotics market and is influenced by several key factors:

  • Demand for TB Treatment: The increasing prevalence of tuberculosis, especially in developing countries, drives the demand for rifampicin. The World Health Organization's (WHO) End TB Strategy aims to reduce TB incidence and mortality, which further boosts the market[2].

  • Clinical Trials and Innovations: Ongoing clinical trials like TBTC Study 31 and CRUSH-TB are introducing shorter and more effective treatment regimens, which can expand the market by offering more convenient and safer treatment options[1][4].

  • Regional Analysis: The rifampicin market is expected to be dominated by regions with high TB prevalence, such as Asia and Africa. These regions are likely to see significant growth due to government initiatives and funding for TB treatment programs[2].

  • Competitor Analysis: The market is competitive, with several manufacturers producing rifampicin. The competition is driven by factors such as pricing, product quality, and regulatory approvals[2].

Market Projections

The global rifampicin market is expected to grow steadily over the forecast period. Here are some key projections:

  • Revenue Growth: The market is anticipated to see revenue growth driven by the increasing demand for TB treatments and the introduction of new, shorter treatment regimens[2].

  • CAGR: While specific CAGR figures for the rifampicin market are not provided, the broader antibiotics market is influenced by factors such as the rise in chronic diseases and government initiatives, which can drive growth at a significant CAGR[3].

  • Regional Dominance: Asia and Africa are expected to dominate the market due to their high TB prevalence and government efforts to combat the disease[2].

Drivers and Restraints

Drivers

  • Increasing TB Prevalence: The ongoing challenge of tuberculosis, particularly in developing countries, continues to drive the demand for rifampicin[1][4].

  • Government Initiatives: Government funding and initiatives to combat TB are crucial drivers for the market. These initiatives often include public health programs and subsidies for TB medications[2].

  • Innovative Treatment Regimens: Clinical trials leading to the development of shorter, more effective treatment regimens are expected to increase patient compliance and reduce treatment costs, thereby driving market growth[1][4].

Restraints

  • Drug Resistance: The emergence of drug-resistant TB strains poses a significant challenge to the effectiveness of rifampicin and other TB medications. This can lead to reduced market growth as alternative treatments may be sought[1].

  • Side Effects and Safety Concerns: Rifampicin, like other antibiotics, can have side effects and safety concerns, which may affect patient compliance and market demand[5].

Technological Trends and Innovations

Shorter Treatment Regimens

The development of shorter treatment regimens, such as the four-month rifapentine-based regimen, is a significant technological trend. These regimens aim to improve patient compliance, reduce treatment costs, and enhance the overall efficacy of TB treatment[1][4].

Pediatric Formulations

TBTC Study 35 is focused on developing a novel water-dispersible, child-friendly formulation of rifapentine with isoniazid for treating latent TB infection in children. This innovation addresses a critical need for pediatric TB treatment and could expand the market by providing a formulation suitable for young children[4].

Market Attractiveness and Competitive Analysis

Market Attractiveness

The rifampicin market is attractive due to the high demand for TB treatments and the potential for innovative treatment regimens. The market's attractiveness is further enhanced by government initiatives and funding for TB programs[2].

Competitive Analysis

The market is competitive with multiple manufacturers producing rifampicin. Key players compete based on factors such as product quality, pricing, and regulatory approvals. The introduction of new treatment regimens and formulations can also influence the competitive landscape[2].

Consumer Behavior Analysis

Patient Compliance

Patient compliance is a critical factor in the success of TB treatment regimens. Shorter treatment regimens, such as those being developed in clinical trials, can significantly improve compliance by reducing the duration and complexity of treatment[1][4].

Public Health Programs

Public health programs and awareness campaigns play a crucial role in driving consumer behavior. These programs often include subsidies for TB medications and educational initiatives to improve treatment adherence[2].

SWOT Analysis

Strengths

  • Established Efficacy: Rifampicin has a well-established efficacy in treating TB.
  • Government Support: Government initiatives and funding support the market.
  • Innovative Regimens: Ongoing clinical trials are developing shorter and more effective treatment regimens.

Weaknesses

  • Drug Resistance: The emergence of drug-resistant TB strains is a significant challenge.
  • Side Effects: Rifampicin can have side effects and safety concerns.
  • Dependence on Public Health Programs: Market growth is heavily dependent on public health programs and government funding.

Opportunities

  • Growing Demand: Increasing TB prevalence, especially in developing countries.
  • Innovative Formulations: Development of pediatric and other specialized formulations.
  • Shorter Treatment Regimens: Introduction of shorter treatment regimens to improve patient compliance.

Threats

  • Competition: Competitive market with multiple manufacturers.
  • Regulatory Changes: Changes in regulatory approvals and guidelines can impact market dynamics.
  • Economic Factors: Economic downturns can affect government funding and public health programs.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Trials: Recent clinical trials like TBTC Study 31 have shown promising results for shorter treatment regimens.
  • Market Growth: The global rifampicin market is expected to grow driven by increasing TB prevalence and government initiatives.
  • Innovations: Development of new treatment regimens and formulations, such as pediatric formulations, is a significant trend.
  • Challenges: Drug resistance and side effects remain significant challenges.

FAQs

What is the current status of TBTC Study 31?

TBTC Study 31, also known as ACTG A5349, has concluded and demonstrated the non-inferiority of a four-month rifapentine-based regimen compared to the standard six-month regimen for drug-susceptible TB[1][4].

How does rifampicin work?

Rifampicin works by inhibiting the microbial DNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RNAP), thereby preventing the synthesis of bacterial RNA and proteins[5].

What are the key drivers for the rifampicin market?

The key drivers include increasing TB prevalence, government initiatives, and the development of innovative treatment regimens[1][2][4].

What are the potential restraints for the rifampicin market?

The emergence of drug-resistant TB strains, side effects, and safety concerns are significant restraints for the market[1][5].

What is the significance of shorter treatment regimens in TB treatment?

Shorter treatment regimens, such as the four-month rifapentine-based regimen, can improve patient compliance, reduce treatment costs, and enhance the overall efficacy of TB treatment[1][4].

Sources

  1. WHO: New Study 31/A5349 on the treatment of drug-susceptible TB.
  2. Cognitivemarketresearch.com: Rifampicin Market Report 2025 (Global Edition).
  3. Straitsresearch.com: Global Clinical Trials Market Size, Top Share, Trends, Forecast by ...
  4. CDC: Tuberculosis Trials Consortium - CDC.
  5. DrugBank Online: Rifampin: Uses, Interactions, Mechanism of Action | DrugBank Online.

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.