You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 12, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR SACUBITRIL; VALSARTAN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for SACUBITRIL; VALSARTAN

Trial IDTitleStatusSponsorPhaseStart DateSummary
NCT02636283 ↗ Use of Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan for the Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease Terminated American Heart Association Phase 2 2017-12-31 This study proposes the use of Entresto (sacubitril/valsartan) to test the effects on pain free walking duration on patients with peripheral arterial disease, a condition caused by decreased blood flow to the muscles in the legs.
NCT02636283 ↗ Use of Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan for the Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease Terminated University of Minnesota Phase 2 2017-12-31 This study proposes the use of Entresto (sacubitril/valsartan) to test the effects on pain free walking duration on patients with peripheral arterial disease, a condition caused by decreased blood flow to the muscles in the legs.
NCT02636283 ↗ Use of Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan for the Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease Terminated University of Minnesota - Clinical and Translational Science Institute Phase 2 2017-12-31 This study proposes the use of Entresto (sacubitril/valsartan) to test the effects on pain free walking duration on patients with peripheral arterial disease, a condition caused by decreased blood flow to the muscles in the legs.
NCT02554890 ↗ Comparison of Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Enalapril on Effect on NT-proBNP in Patients Stabilized From an Acute Heart Failure Episode. Completed Novartis Pharmaceuticals Phase 4 2016-04-29 The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of in-hospital initiation of sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) vs. enalapril on time averaged proportional change in NT-proBNP in patients who have been stabilized following hospitalization for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) and reduced ejection fraction (left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40%).
NCT01920711 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 Compared to Valsartan, on Morbidity and Mortality in Heart Failure Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction Completed Novartis Pharmaceuticals Phase 3 2014-07-18 The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of LCZ696 compared to valsartan in the reduction of cardiovascular death and heart failure(HF) hospitalizations in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction.
>Trial ID>Title>Status>Phase>Start Date>Summary
Showing 1 to 5 of 5 entries

Clinical Trial Conditions for SACUBITRIL; VALSARTAN

Condition Name

32873005101520253035Heart FailureHypertensionHeart Failure With Preserved Ejection FractionCardiotoxicity[disabled in preview]
Condition Name for SACUBITRIL; VALSARTAN
Intervention Trials
Heart Failure 32
Hypertension 8
Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction 7
Cardiotoxicity 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

6076500102030405060Heart FailureHypertensionMyocardial InfarctionInfarction[disabled in preview]
Condition MeSH for SACUBITRIL; VALSARTAN
Intervention Trials
Heart Failure 60
Hypertension 7
Myocardial Infarction 6
Infarction 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for SACUBITRIL; VALSARTAN

Trials by Country

+
Trials by Country for SACUBITRIL; VALSARTAN
Location Trials
United States 267
Italy 53
Spain 50
Japan 47
China 36
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

+
Trials by US State for SACUBITRIL; VALSARTAN
Location Trials
California 11
Massachusetts 10
Virginia 10
Tennessee 10
Minnesota 9
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for SACUBITRIL; VALSARTAN

Clinical Trial Phase

51.9%20.8%24.7%00510152025303540Phase 4Phase 3Phase 2/Phase 3[disabled in preview]
Clinical Trial Phase for SACUBITRIL; VALSARTAN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 40
Phase 3 16
Phase 2/Phase 3 2
[disabled in preview] 19
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

43.0%24.4%22.1%10.5%0101520253035RecruitingCompletedNot yet recruiting[disabled in preview]
Clinical Trial Status for SACUBITRIL; VALSARTAN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Recruiting 37
Completed 21
Not yet recruiting 19
[disabled in preview] 9
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for SACUBITRIL; VALSARTAN

Sponsor Name

trials024681012141618202224Novartis PharmaceuticalsBrigham and Women's HospitalThe Heartbeat Trust[disabled in preview]
Sponsor Name for SACUBITRIL; VALSARTAN
Sponsor Trials
Novartis Pharmaceuticals 22
Brigham and Women's Hospital 4
The Heartbeat Trust 3
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

77.9%19.5%0020406080100120OtherIndustryNIH[disabled in preview]
Sponsor Type for SACUBITRIL; VALSARTAN
Sponsor Trials
Other 120
Industry 30
NIH 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sacubitril/Valsartan: Clinical Trials, Market Analysis, and Projections

Introduction

Sacubitril/valsartan, a combination of a neprilysin inhibitor and an angiotensin receptor blocker, has been a significant advancement in the treatment of heart failure and hypertension. This article delves into the recent clinical trials, market analysis, and future projections for this drug.

Clinical Trials Overview

LIFE Trial

The LIFE trial, a 24-week prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active comparator phase 4 clinical trial, assessed the tolerability, safety, and efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan compared to valsartan in patients with advanced chronic heart failure and recent NYHA class IV symptoms. The trial found no significant difference between sacubitril/valsartan and valsartan in lowering NT-proBNP levels, although it highlighted the challenges in tolerability, with 18% of patients unable to tolerate sacubitril/valsartan during the short run-in period[1].

PARADIGM-HF and PARAGON-HF Trials

A post hoc analysis of the PARADIGM-HF and PARAGON-HF trials, involving 13,194 patients with chronic heart failure, demonstrated that sacubitril/valsartan significantly reduced the risk of all-cause hospitalizations compared to renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi). This reduction was primarily driven by lower rates of cardiac and pulmonary hospitalizations, particularly benefiting patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) below normal[4].

Efficacy in Heart Failure

Mortality and Hospitalization Reduction

Studies have consistently shown that sacubitril/valsartan reduces mortality and hospitalization in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The PARADIGM trial, for instance, highlighted the drug's ability to decrease both cardiovascular and all-cause mortality compared to enalapril[5].

NT-proBNP Levels

While the LIFE trial did not show a significant difference in NT-proBNP levels between sacubitril/valsartan and valsartan, other studies have indicated that sacubitril/valsartan can effectively lower NT-proBNP levels, a biomarker for heart failure severity[1].

Efficacy in Hypertension

Blood Pressure Reduction

Sacubitril/valsartan has been shown to reduce blood pressure effectively in patients with hypertension. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials found that sacubitril/valsartan decreased mean sitting systolic blood pressure by approximately 5.43 mm Hg compared to angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs)[2].

Cost-Utility Analysis in Hypertension

A cost-utility analysis in China indicated that sacubitril/valsartan, while more expensive than valsartan, provided additional quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and was considered cost-effective at certain willingness-to-pay thresholds. For a 60-year-old patient, sacubitril/valsartan resulted in 11.91 QALYs compared to 11.82 QALYs with valsartan, with an incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) of 108,622 CNY/QALY, which was below the WTP threshold[2].

Market Analysis

Cost-Effectiveness

The cost-effectiveness of sacubitril/valsartan is a critical factor in its market positioning. A study evaluating the cost-effectiveness of sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril in patients with HFrEF over a 5-year horizon found that while sacubitril/valsartan was more expensive, it provided additional QALYs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $143,891/QALY, making it cost-effective at a willingness to pay of $150,000/QALY[5].

Market Adoption

Despite its higher cost, sacubitril/valsartan has been recommended as a first-line treatment for heart failure by the 2021 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) heart failure guidelines. Its adoption is expected to increase as more evidence supports its clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness in various patient populations[2].

Projections and Future Outlook

Expanding Indications

Given its efficacy in both heart failure and hypertension, there is potential for sacubitril/valsartan to be approved for additional indications. Ongoing and future trials may explore its use in other cardiovascular conditions, further expanding its market reach.

Cost and Access

The cost of sacubitril/valsartan remains a significant barrier to widespread adoption. However, as more countries conduct cost-utility analyses and include the drug in their healthcare reimbursement lists, access is likely to improve. Negotiations with healthcare providers and payers will be crucial in making the drug more affordable.

Competitive Landscape

The cardiovascular drug market is highly competitive, with various treatments available for heart failure and hypertension. Sacubitril/valsartan's unique mechanism of action and proven clinical benefits position it favorably, but it must continue to demonstrate value through ongoing research and real-world evidence.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Efficacy: Sacubitril/valsartan has been shown to reduce mortality, hospitalizations, and blood pressure in patients with heart failure and hypertension.
  • Cost-Effectiveness: While more expensive than traditional treatments, sacubitril/valsartan can be cost-effective at certain willingness-to-pay thresholds.
  • Market Adoption: Recommended as a first-line treatment by major guidelines, its adoption is expected to increase as more evidence supports its benefits.
  • Future Outlook: Potential for expanded indications and improved access through cost negotiations and inclusion in healthcare reimbursement lists.

FAQs

Q: What is the primary mechanism of action of sacubitril/valsartan?

A: Sacubitril/valsartan works by inhibiting neprilysin and blocking the angiotensin II type 1 receptor, leading to increased levels of natriuretic peptides and reduced angiotensin II effects.

Q: Which clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure?

A: The PARADIGM-HF and PARAGON-HF trials have shown significant reductions in mortality and hospitalizations with sacubitril/valsartan compared to RASi.

Q: Is sacubitril/valsartan cost-effective for treating hypertension?

A: Yes, cost-utility analyses have indicated that sacubitril/valsartan can be cost-effective for treating hypertension, especially at higher willingness-to-pay thresholds.

Q: What are the potential side effects of sacubitril/valsartan?

A: Common side effects include hypotension, hyperkalemia, and renal impairment. The LIFE trial also highlighted tolerability issues in some patients.

Q: Are there any ongoing or future trials for sacubitril/valsartan?

A: Yes, ongoing and future trials are expected to explore additional indications and further establish the drug's clinical and cost-effectiveness.

Sources

  1. JAMA Cardiology: Effect of Treatment With Sacubitril/Valsartan in Patients With Advanced Chronic Heart Failure and Recent NYHA Class IV Symptoms: The LIFE Trial[1].
  2. Frontiers in Public Health: Sacubitril-valsartan for the treatment of hypertension in China: A cost-utility analysis based on meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[2].
  3. Value in Health: HPR249 Utilization and Expenditure on Sacubitril/Valsartan in the Turkish Market[3].
  4. JAMA Cardiology: Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan on All-Cause Hospitalizations in Heart Failure: Post Hoc Analysis of the PARADIGM-HF and PARAGON-HF Randomized Clinical Trials[4].
  5. Pharmacotherapy: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Sacubitril/Valsartan for the Treatment of Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction[5].

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.