You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: November 22, 2024

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR SECTRAL


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for SECTRAL

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00578617 ↗ Ablation vs Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation - Pilot Trial Completed Abbott Medical Devices N/A 2006-09-01 The CABANA pilot study is designed to test the hypothesis that the treatment strategy of percutaneous left atrial catheter ablation for the purpose of the elimination of atrial fibrillation (AF) is superior to current state-of-the-art therapy with either rate control or anti-arrhythmic drugs for reducing AF recurrences at 1 year follow-up.
NCT00578617 ↗ Ablation vs Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation - Pilot Trial Completed Duke Clinical Research Institute N/A 2006-09-01 The CABANA pilot study is designed to test the hypothesis that the treatment strategy of percutaneous left atrial catheter ablation for the purpose of the elimination of atrial fibrillation (AF) is superior to current state-of-the-art therapy with either rate control or anti-arrhythmic drugs for reducing AF recurrences at 1 year follow-up.
NCT00578617 ↗ Ablation vs Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation - Pilot Trial Completed St. Jude Medical N/A 2006-09-01 The CABANA pilot study is designed to test the hypothesis that the treatment strategy of percutaneous left atrial catheter ablation for the purpose of the elimination of atrial fibrillation (AF) is superior to current state-of-the-art therapy with either rate control or anti-arrhythmic drugs for reducing AF recurrences at 1 year follow-up.
NCT00578617 ↗ Ablation vs Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation - Pilot Trial Completed Mayo Clinic N/A 2006-09-01 The CABANA pilot study is designed to test the hypothesis that the treatment strategy of percutaneous left atrial catheter ablation for the purpose of the elimination of atrial fibrillation (AF) is superior to current state-of-the-art therapy with either rate control or anti-arrhythmic drugs for reducing AF recurrences at 1 year follow-up.
NCT01743885 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of Propranolol Versus Acebutolol on the Proliferative Phase of Infantile Hemangioma Terminated University Hospital, Montpellier Phase 3 2012-11-01 There is no effective treatment for hemangioma regardless of immediate severity. That is in this respect a orphan disease. These hemangiomas, sometimes large, will have a phase of proliferation of several months (very scary for parents) and regression over several years. The natural history is peppered with local complications (ulcers) and aesthetic and psychological sequelae (sometimes major for the child and the family). The effects of acebutolol and propranolol on the proliferative hemangiomas were discovered accidentally by two French teams (Montpellier for acebutolol and Bordeaux for propranolol). Acebutolol and propranolol have been used for many years for the treatment of hypertension and congenital heart disease, including infants, with few side effects. The effects of acebutolol and propranolol were immediately visible with reduced volume and skin whitening of the hemangioma. In a preliminary study, acebutolol was administered to 20 patients in Montpellier with big regression of hemangiomas. The aim of the study was to compare the clinical efficacy of acebutolol (10mg/Kg/jour) and propranolol (3mg/Kg/j) on the proliferative phase of infantile hemangioma in infants.
NCT02853045 ↗ Comparison of Blood Pressure Control Achieved in Antihypertensive or Generic Drugs in Moderate to Severe Hypertensive Patients Completed Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne Phase 4 2015-06-11 Despite a large diffusion for generic anti-hypertensive, they are not currently used. Clinical validation studies could be better to convince users and prescribers than pharmacologic validation only. A pragmatic study to evaluate generic anti-hypertensive efficacy is proposed. It takes place in real conditions of care for hypertensive patients, for a manometer control criteria. The aim of the study is to test the hypothesis of non-inferiority for generic anti-hypertensive for blood pressure control.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for SECTRAL

Condition Name

Condition Name for SECTRAL
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 1
Arrhythmia 1
Atrial Fibrillation 1
Hemangioma 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for SECTRAL
Intervention Trials
Atrial Fibrillation 1
Hypertension 1
Port-Wine Stain 1
Hemangioma, Capillary 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for SECTRAL

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for SECTRAL
Location Trials
United States 10
France 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for SECTRAL
Location Trials
Utah 1
Pennsylvania 1
Ohio 1
Minnesota 1
Massachusetts 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for SECTRAL

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for SECTRAL
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 1
N/A 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for SECTRAL
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 2
Terminated 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for SECTRAL

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for SECTRAL
Sponsor Trials
Abbott Medical Devices 1
Duke Clinical Research Institute 1
St. Jude Medical 1
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for SECTRAL
Sponsor Trials
Other 4
Industry 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.