You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 17, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR SEPTRA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for SEPTRA

Trial IDTitleStatusSponsorPhaseStart DateSummary
NCT00002524 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With AIDS-Related Lymphoma Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 1993-06-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more cancer cells. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy in treating patients with AIDS-related lymphoma.
NCT00000655 ↗ A Randomized, Double-Blind Study of 566C80 Versus Septra (Sulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim) for the Treatment of Pneumocystis Carinii Pneumonia in AIDS Patients Completed Glaxo Wellcome Phase 2 1969-12-31 To evaluate the effectiveness of atovaquone (566C80) compared to a standard antipneumocystis agent, (SMX/TMP), for the treatment of mild to moderate Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) in AIDS patients. To compare the safety of short-term (21 days) treatment with 566C80 and SMX/TMP in AIDS patients with an acute episode of PCP. Standard therapies for acute treatment of PCP involve either SMX/TMP or pentamidine isetionate. Although both treatments are equally effective, side effects prevent completion of therapy in 11-55 percent of patients.
NCT00000655 ↗ A Randomized, Double-Blind Study of 566C80 Versus Septra (Sulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim) for the Treatment of Pneumocystis Carinii Pneumonia in AIDS Patients Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 2 1969-12-31 To evaluate the effectiveness of atovaquone (566C80) compared to a standard antipneumocystis agent, (SMX/TMP), for the treatment of mild to moderate Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) in AIDS patients. To compare the safety of short-term (21 days) treatment with 566C80 and SMX/TMP in AIDS patients with an acute episode of PCP. Standard therapies for acute treatment of PCP involve either SMX/TMP or pentamidine isetionate. Although both treatments are equally effective, side effects prevent completion of therapy in 11-55 percent of patients.
>Trial ID>Title>Status>Phase>Start Date>Summary
Showing 1 to 3 of 3 entries

Clinical Trial Conditions for SEPTRA

Condition Name

5320-0.500.511.522.533.544.555.5Urinary Tract InfectionAbscessInfection[disabled in preview]
Condition Name for SEPTRA
Intervention Trials
Urinary Tract Infection 5
Abscess 3
Infection 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

8870012345678InfectionsInfectionCommunicable Diseases[disabled in preview]
Condition MeSH for SEPTRA
Intervention Trials
Infections 8
Infection 8
Communicable Diseases 7
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for SEPTRA

Trials by Country

+
Trials by Country for SEPTRA
Location Trials
United States 53
Canada 7
Belgium 3
France 2
Botswana 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

+
Trials by US State for SEPTRA
Location Trials
Texas 6
Ohio 4
New York 4
Missouri 4
Washington 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for SEPTRA

Clinical Trial Phase

62.5%25.0%12.5%0-0.500.511.522.533.544.555.5Phase 4Phase 3Phase 2/Phase 3[disabled in preview]
Clinical Trial Phase for SEPTRA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 5
Phase 3 2
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

63.6%22.7%13.6%002468101214CompletedRecruitingUnknown status[disabled in preview]
Clinical Trial Status for SEPTRA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 14
Recruiting 5
Unknown status 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for SEPTRA

Sponsor Name

trials011223344National Cancer Institute (NCI)University of WashingtonM.D. Anderson Cancer Center[disabled in preview]
Sponsor Name for SEPTRA
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 4
University of Washington 3
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

74.5%16.4%9.1%0051015202530354045OtherNIHU.S. Fed[disabled in preview]
Sponsor Type for SEPTRA
Sponsor Trials
Other 41
NIH 9
U.S. Fed 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

SEPTRA: Clinical Trials, Market Analysis, and Projections

Introduction to SEPTRA

SEPTRA, known generically as trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), is a widely used antibiotic combination prescribed for various bacterial infections, including skin and soft tissue infections, urinary tract infections, and acne. Here, we will delve into the current clinical trials, market analysis, and future projections for SEPTRA.

Clinical Trials and Current Research

Active Clinical Trials

SEPTRA is currently involved in several active clinical trials to evaluate its efficacy and safety in various conditions. These trials include:

  • Immunocompromised Patients: Studies are ongoing to assess the effectiveness of SEPTRA in immunocompromised patients, a group particularly susceptible to severe infections[1].
  • Fluid Replacement Therapy: Trials are investigating the role of SEPTRA in fluid replacement therapy, which could expand its use beyond traditional antibiotic applications[1].
  • Enteritis Infections: SEPTRA is being evaluated for its efficacy in treating enteritis infections caused by Shigella sonnei and Shigella flexneri[1].
  • Other Infections: Additional trials are focused on its use in treating pneumonia, nocardiosis, brucellosis, diarrhea, otitis media, urinary tract infections, and cholera[1].

Recent FDA Updates

The FDA has recently revised the labeling for SEPTRA and its generic counterpart, Bactrim, following investigations by pediatric physicians at Children's Mercy Kansas City. The updated labeling warns medical providers to monitor patients for symptoms of acute respiratory distress syndrome, which can be life-threatening[4].

Efficacy and Safety

Efficacy in Clinical Trials

While SEPTRA is not the focus of the ZEVTERA trials, its efficacy in treating various infections is well-documented. However, the recent revisions to its labeling highlight the need for careful monitoring of patients.

  • Respiratory Complications: The revised labeling emphasizes the risk of severe acute respiratory failure, particularly in pediatric patients. This underscores the importance of vigilant monitoring and early intervention to prevent serious complications[4].

Safety Profile

The safety profile of SEPTRA includes potential side effects such as cough, shortness of breath, and rapid, shallow breathing, which could lead to acute respiratory distress syndrome. These risks necessitate careful patient selection and monitoring[4].

Market Analysis

Market Position

SEPTRA remains a staple in the antibiotic market due to its broad-spectrum activity and affordability. However, the recent labeling changes may impact its prescription rates, especially in pediatric patients.

  • Competitive Landscape: The antibiotic market is highly competitive, with newer drugs like ZEVTERA gaining traction. ZEVTERA, for instance, has shown promising results in treating serious infections such as Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia[3].

Economic Factors

The economic outlook for the pharmaceutical sector in 2025 is generally positive, with solid economic growth expected in the U.S. and moderate growth in the eurozone. This economic stability could support continued investment in pharmaceutical research and development, including antibiotics like SEPTRA[5].

Projections for 2025

Market Trends

  • Increased Scrutiny: Given the recent FDA labeling updates, there may be increased scrutiny on the use of SEPTRA, particularly in vulnerable populations. This could lead to a slight decline in prescriptions unless new data emerges to mitigate these concerns[4].
  • Competition from Newer Antibiotics: The introduction of newer antibiotics with favorable safety and efficacy profiles, such as ZEVTERA, may challenge SEPTRA's market share. ZEVTERA's success in clinical trials for treating serious infections could attract more prescriptions away from SEPTRA[3].

Regulatory Environment

The regulatory environment will continue to play a crucial role in the market dynamics of SEPTRA. Any further updates or warnings from regulatory bodies could significantly impact its market position.

  • Ongoing Clinical Trials: The outcomes of ongoing clinical trials will be critical in determining the future of SEPTRA. Positive results could reinforce its position, while negative outcomes might further erode its market share[1].

Key Takeaways

  • SEPTRA remains a widely used antibiotic, but recent FDA labeling updates highlight the need for careful patient monitoring.
  • Ongoing clinical trials are evaluating SEPTRA's efficacy in various conditions, including immunocompromised patients and fluid replacement therapy.
  • Market competition from newer antibiotics like ZEVTERA could challenge SEPTRA's market share.
  • Economic stability in 2025 is expected to support continued investment in pharmaceutical research and development.

FAQs

What are the current clinical trials for SEPTRA focused on?

The current clinical trials for SEPTRA are focused on evaluating its efficacy in treating various conditions, including infections in immunocompromised patients, fluid replacement therapy, and enteritis infections caused by Shigella species[1].

What are the recent FDA updates for SEPTRA?

The FDA has revised the labeling for SEPTRA to warn medical providers about the risk of severe acute respiratory failure, particularly in pediatric patients[4].

How does SEPTRA compare to newer antibiotics like ZEVTERA?

SEPTRA faces competition from newer antibiotics like ZEVTERA, which have shown promising results in clinical trials for treating serious infections. ZEVTERA's safety and efficacy profile may attract more prescriptions away from SEPTRA[3].

What is the projected market trend for SEPTRA in 2025?

The market trend for SEPTRA in 2025 may include increased scrutiny due to recent FDA labeling updates and competition from newer antibiotics. However, ongoing clinical trials could reinforce its position if positive results are obtained[1][3][4].

What are the potential side effects of SEPTRA?

SEPTRA can cause side effects such as cough, shortness of breath, and rapid, shallow breathing, which could lead to acute respiratory distress syndrome. Careful patient monitoring is advised[4].

How does the economic outlook for 2025 impact the pharmaceutical sector?

The economic outlook for 2025 is generally positive, with solid economic growth expected in the U.S. and moderate growth in the eurozone. This stability could support continued investment in pharmaceutical research and development[5].

Sources

  1. WithPower: Septra Ds: Everything you need to know | Power - Clinical Trials.
  2. MarketBeat: Septerna (SEPN) Stock Forecast and Price Target 2025.
  3. FDA: Drug Trials Snapshots: ZEVTERA.
  4. Children's Mercy: Bactrim, Septra FDA label revised after Children's Mercy investigation.
  5. S&P Global: 2025 Outlooks.

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.