You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: November 8, 2024

~ Buy the SYMTUZA (cobicistat; darunavir; emtricitabine; tenofovir alafenamide fumarate) Drug Profile, 2024 PDF Report in the Report Store ~

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR SYMTUZA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for SYMTUZA

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT03696160 ↗ The Late Presenter Treatment Optimisation Study Recruiting Gilead Sciences Phase 3 2019-03-05 The main purpose of this study is to compare two different types of HIV treatments, in terms of effectiveness and improvement of side effects, for patients who are diagnosed with a more advanced HIV infection. Patients with advanced HIV infections are otherwise known as 'late presenters'. There are many effective treatments for HIV available; however, for late presenting patients the investigators do not know which type of treatment performs best. This is the first large study to compare treatments for patients in this situation, and the investigators hope that the results of this study will help doctors decide which treatments to use in the future. The two different types of treatment the investigators are comparing both contain a mixture of drugs that work together to combat HIV: The Boosted Protease Inhibitor combination (PI) which is a combination tablet containing: darunavir, cobicistat, emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide. It was approved for use in Europe under the brand name Symtuza®. The Integrase Inhibitor combination (INI). Which is a combination tablet containing: bictegravir, emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide. This is a a newer combination which was approved for use in Europe in June 2018 under the brand name of Biktarvy®. The main difference between the two treatments is how each one fights a HIV infection. They both stop a part of the virus from working (i.e. inhibit it), to prevent it from making copies of itself. The PI treatment contains drugs to stop the protease part of the virus, whereas the INI treatment contains drugs to stop the integrase part. In recent studies, it appears that treatments containing integrase inhibitors may be better for late presenting patients. They have been shown to quickly bring down the amount of virus in the body, and the side effects may be more acceptable to late presenters. To compare the two treatments, half of the participants on this study will be given the PI treatment, and the other half will be given the INI treatment.
NCT03696160 ↗ The Late Presenter Treatment Optimisation Study Recruiting Janssen Pharmaceuticals Phase 3 2019-03-05 The main purpose of this study is to compare two different types of HIV treatments, in terms of effectiveness and improvement of side effects, for patients who are diagnosed with a more advanced HIV infection. Patients with advanced HIV infections are otherwise known as 'late presenters'. There are many effective treatments for HIV available; however, for late presenting patients the investigators do not know which type of treatment performs best. This is the first large study to compare treatments for patients in this situation, and the investigators hope that the results of this study will help doctors decide which treatments to use in the future. The two different types of treatment the investigators are comparing both contain a mixture of drugs that work together to combat HIV: The Boosted Protease Inhibitor combination (PI) which is a combination tablet containing: darunavir, cobicistat, emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide. It was approved for use in Europe under the brand name Symtuza®. The Integrase Inhibitor combination (INI). Which is a combination tablet containing: bictegravir, emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide. This is a a newer combination which was approved for use in Europe in June 2018 under the brand name of Biktarvy®. The main difference between the two treatments is how each one fights a HIV infection. They both stop a part of the virus from working (i.e. inhibit it), to prevent it from making copies of itself. The PI treatment contains drugs to stop the protease part of the virus, whereas the INI treatment contains drugs to stop the integrase part. In recent studies, it appears that treatments containing integrase inhibitors may be better for late presenting patients. They have been shown to quickly bring down the amount of virus in the body, and the side effects may be more acceptable to late presenters. To compare the two treatments, half of the participants on this study will be given the PI treatment, and the other half will be given the INI treatment.
NCT03696160 ↗ The Late Presenter Treatment Optimisation Study Recruiting NEAT ID Foundation Phase 3 2019-03-05 The main purpose of this study is to compare two different types of HIV treatments, in terms of effectiveness and improvement of side effects, for patients who are diagnosed with a more advanced HIV infection. Patients with advanced HIV infections are otherwise known as 'late presenters'. There are many effective treatments for HIV available; however, for late presenting patients the investigators do not know which type of treatment performs best. This is the first large study to compare treatments for patients in this situation, and the investigators hope that the results of this study will help doctors decide which treatments to use in the future. The two different types of treatment the investigators are comparing both contain a mixture of drugs that work together to combat HIV: The Boosted Protease Inhibitor combination (PI) which is a combination tablet containing: darunavir, cobicistat, emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide. It was approved for use in Europe under the brand name Symtuza®. The Integrase Inhibitor combination (INI). Which is a combination tablet containing: bictegravir, emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide. This is a a newer combination which was approved for use in Europe in June 2018 under the brand name of Biktarvy®. The main difference between the two treatments is how each one fights a HIV infection. They both stop a part of the virus from working (i.e. inhibit it), to prevent it from making copies of itself. The PI treatment contains drugs to stop the protease part of the virus, whereas the INI treatment contains drugs to stop the integrase part. In recent studies, it appears that treatments containing integrase inhibitors may be better for late presenting patients. They have been shown to quickly bring down the amount of virus in the body, and the side effects may be more acceptable to late presenters. To compare the two treatments, half of the participants on this study will be given the PI treatment, and the other half will be given the INI treatment.
NCT04240210 ↗ Integrase Regimen Switch to Symtuza to Increase Tolerability/Adherence (SYMita) Not yet recruiting Janssen Pharmaceuticals Phase 4 2020-01-01 Darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (DRV/COB/FTC/TAF) is a coformulated STR, is the only protease inhibitor based STR, and is noted for its high tolerability3. These traits have the potential to improve adherence in patients who have intolerance to the integrase inhibitor class. We propose a two part study design to evaluate if patients who have suboptimal adherence due to integrase inhibitor intolerance may better tolerate Symtuza and subsequently have improved adherence.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for SYMTUZA

Condition Name

Condition Name for SYMTUZA
Intervention Trials
Human Immunodeficiency Virus 2
HIV Infections 1
HIV-1-infection 1
HIV/AIDS 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for SYMTUZA
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 3
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome 3
Obesity 1
Infections 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for SYMTUZA

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for SYMTUZA
Location Trials
United Kingdom 2
United States 2
Belgium 1
Ireland 1
Germany 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for SYMTUZA
Location Trials
North Carolina 1
Texas 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for SYMTUZA

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for SYMTUZA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 3
Phase 3 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for SYMTUZA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Not yet recruiting 3
Recruiting 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for SYMTUZA

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for SYMTUZA
Sponsor Trials
Gilead Sciences 2
Janssen Pharmaceuticals 2
Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for SYMTUZA
Sponsor Trials
Industry 7
Other 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.