You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 14, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR VENTOLIN HFA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for VENTOLIN HFA

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial TypeTrial IDTitleStatusSponsorPhaseStart DateSummary
New Combination NCT03906045 ↗ A Scintigraphy Study of PT010 in COPD Patients Completed Simbec Research Phase 1 2019-04-04 This study is a single treatment period, single dose gamma scintigraphy study investigating the deposition in the lungs of a Budesonide, Glycopyrronium and Formoterol Fumarate Metered Dose Inhaler (BGF-MDI). This study will be investigating how the drug (known as PT010) is distributed in the lungs of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients (with moderate to very severe COPD) following a maximal 10 second breath hold. This inhaler is intended to be used in the treatment of COPD, which is a group of diseases which cause lung problems and difficulty breathing. PT010 is a new combination product of 3 marketed drugs called Glycopyrronium, Formoterol Fumarate and Budesonide.
New Combination NCT03906045 ↗ A Scintigraphy Study of PT010 in COPD Patients Completed AstraZeneca Phase 1 2019-04-04 This study is a single treatment period, single dose gamma scintigraphy study investigating the deposition in the lungs of a Budesonide, Glycopyrronium and Formoterol Fumarate Metered Dose Inhaler (BGF-MDI). This study will be investigating how the drug (known as PT010) is distributed in the lungs of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients (with moderate to very severe COPD) following a maximal 10 second breath hold. This inhaler is intended to be used in the treatment of COPD, which is a group of diseases which cause lung problems and difficulty breathing. PT010 is a new combination product of 3 marketed drugs called Glycopyrronium, Formoterol Fumarate and Budesonide.
New Dosage NCT01323010 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of Increasing Doses of Inhaled Albuterol in Children With Acute Wheezing Episodes Completed Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo N/A 2011-09-01 Metered dose inhalers with spacers are devices capable of providing higher rates of lung deposition of drugs such as beta agonists when compared to conventional nebulizers, but there is no consensus about the optimal dose when this is the device of choice and there is evidence that younger children need proportionally higher doses of albuterol (in μg/kg) when compared to older children. Other factors that may interfere with response to albuterol treatment include the genetics of the beta adrenergic receptor (ADRβ2) and infectious etiology of the wheezing attack. This study will assess the effectiveness of a dose regimen that prioritizes higher doses of albuterol, with doses in μg/kg higher for younger children. Security of this new dosing regimen will be assessed by monitoring clinical side effects and serum levels of albuterol, but the investigators will also examine the presence of 12 different respiratory viruses in these patients and evaluate the influence of ADRβ2 receptor genetics in the response to albuterol. The primary outcome measure will be the need for hospitalization. Secondary outcomes will include a change in clinical score, respiratory rate and forced expiratory volume in the first second, the need for additional treatments and length of stay in the emergency room for those not hospitalized.
New Dosage NCT01323010 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of Increasing Doses of Inhaled Albuterol in Children With Acute Wheezing Episodes Completed University of Sao Paulo N/A 2011-09-01 Metered dose inhalers with spacers are devices capable of providing higher rates of lung deposition of drugs such as beta agonists when compared to conventional nebulizers, but there is no consensus about the optimal dose when this is the device of choice and there is evidence that younger children need proportionally higher doses of albuterol (in μg/kg) when compared to older children. Other factors that may interfere with response to albuterol treatment include the genetics of the beta adrenergic receptor (ADRβ2) and infectious etiology of the wheezing attack. This study will assess the effectiveness of a dose regimen that prioritizes higher doses of albuterol, with doses in μg/kg higher for younger children. Security of this new dosing regimen will be assessed by monitoring clinical side effects and serum levels of albuterol, but the investigators will also examine the presence of 12 different respiratory viruses in these patients and evaluate the influence of ADRβ2 receptor genetics in the response to albuterol. The primary outcome measure will be the need for hospitalization. Secondary outcomes will include a change in clinical score, respiratory rate and forced expiratory volume in the first second, the need for additional treatments and length of stay in the emergency room for those not hospitalized.
>Trial Type>Trial ID>Title>Status>Phase>Start Date>Summary
Showing 1 to 4 of 4 entries

All Clinical Trials for VENTOLIN HFA

Trial IDTitleStatusSponsorPhaseStart DateSummary
NCT00180843 ↗ Assessment of Ventilation-perfusion Abnormalities in Patients With Stable Smoking-related Airways Disease Terminated GlaxoSmithKline N/A 2005-09-01 Subjects undergo history, examination, lung function assessment after informed consent has been obtained. All subjects will undergo ventilation-perfusion scans. If there first scan is normal they will undergo a second and final scan four weeks later. If abnormal they will undergo two further scans with either nebulized bronchodilator or nebulized saline prior to their second and third scans. Each time they will have repeat lung function tests prior to scanning. We will examine the regional changes in ventilation and perfusion and there relationship to lung function.
NCT00180843 ↗ Assessment of Ventilation-perfusion Abnormalities in Patients With Stable Smoking-related Airways Disease Terminated Imperial College London N/A 2005-09-01 Subjects undergo history, examination, lung function assessment after informed consent has been obtained. All subjects will undergo ventilation-perfusion scans. If there first scan is normal they will undergo a second and final scan four weeks later. If abnormal they will undergo two further scans with either nebulized bronchodilator or nebulized saline prior to their second and third scans. Each time they will have repeat lung function tests prior to scanning. We will examine the regional changes in ventilation and perfusion and there relationship to lung function.
NCT00102882 ↗ Study Of Asthma And Genetics In Patients To Be Treated With Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol Or Salmeterol Xinafoate Completed GlaxoSmithKline Phase 4 2004-10-01 This study may last up to 36-38 weeks. Patients will visit the clinic 11 times. A blood sample will be taken at Visit 1 to look at subjects' genes. Breathing tests will be done during the study. Study medicines and procedures will be provided at no cost. Patients will be treated with VENTOLIN (8 wks), ATROVENT (8 wks), then ADVAIR or SEREVENT (16 wks). ADVAIR and SEREVENT are FDA approved for the treatment of asthma in patients 4 years of age and older.
NCT00220259 ↗ Cystic Fibrosis Withdrawal of Inhaled Steroids Evaluation Study (CF WISE Study) Completed Cystic Fibrosis Trust N/A 2001-05-01 The overall aim of this study is to find out whether taking regular inhaled steroids (eg Pulmicort, Flixotide, Becotide, Becloforte) is good for the lungs of children and adults with cystic fibrosis (CF). Some patients are put on inhaled steroids because they are wheezy despite taking regular bronchodilators (inhaled medicines that help open up the airways eg Ventolin, Bricanyl). Occasionally young children are put on them when they wheeze with colds, and have simply remained on them ever since. However many CF patients have been put onto inhaled steroids because their doctors thought it might reduce the inflammation in the lungs and help improve lung function. This inflammation (which is swelling of the lining of the airways) is known to be important in CF and results from recurrent chest infections. Although it is believed, in theory, that inhaled steroids should be useful for most CF patients, we are not sure how well they work in CF and it has not yet been possible to prove this with standard studies. This would normally involve starting inhaled steroids in patients who have not been taking them. We have therefore taken a different approach, namely to withdraw them from some patients who have been on them for a long time, to see if there is any effect of stopping them. It is important that we answer this question, as we do not want CF patients taking medicines that may be unnecessary. CF patients already have to take many oral and inhaled medicines and if we can cut down this burden, it would be helpful for everyone. Of course, we may find that patients do need these medicines but at least we will then be certain that it is for a good reason. The main hypothesis is that withdrawing inhaled steroids is not associated with an earlier onset of acute chest exacerbations.
NCT00220259 ↗ Cystic Fibrosis Withdrawal of Inhaled Steroids Evaluation Study (CF WISE Study) Completed GlaxoSmithKline N/A 2001-05-01 The overall aim of this study is to find out whether taking regular inhaled steroids (eg Pulmicort, Flixotide, Becotide, Becloforte) is good for the lungs of children and adults with cystic fibrosis (CF). Some patients are put on inhaled steroids because they are wheezy despite taking regular bronchodilators (inhaled medicines that help open up the airways eg Ventolin, Bricanyl). Occasionally young children are put on them when they wheeze with colds, and have simply remained on them ever since. However many CF patients have been put onto inhaled steroids because their doctors thought it might reduce the inflammation in the lungs and help improve lung function. This inflammation (which is swelling of the lining of the airways) is known to be important in CF and results from recurrent chest infections. Although it is believed, in theory, that inhaled steroids should be useful for most CF patients, we are not sure how well they work in CF and it has not yet been possible to prove this with standard studies. This would normally involve starting inhaled steroids in patients who have not been taking them. We have therefore taken a different approach, namely to withdraw them from some patients who have been on them for a long time, to see if there is any effect of stopping them. It is important that we answer this question, as we do not want CF patients taking medicines that may be unnecessary. CF patients already have to take many oral and inhaled medicines and if we can cut down this burden, it would be helpful for everyone. Of course, we may find that patients do need these medicines but at least we will then be certain that it is for a good reason. The main hypothesis is that withdrawing inhaled steroids is not associated with an earlier onset of acute chest exacerbations.
>Trial ID>Title>Status>Phase>Start Date>Summary
Showing 1 to 5 of 5 entries

Clinical Trial Conditions for VENTOLIN HFA

Condition Name

223330-2024681012141618202224AsthmaChronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseAsthma in ChildrenCOPD[disabled in preview]
Condition Name for VENTOLIN HFA
Intervention Trials
Asthma 22
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 3
Asthma in Children 3
COPD 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

235440-2024681012141618202224AsthmaPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveLung Diseases, ObstructiveLung Diseases[disabled in preview]
Condition MeSH for VENTOLIN HFA
Intervention Trials
Asthma 23
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive 5
Lung Diseases, Obstructive 4
Lung Diseases 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for VENTOLIN HFA

Trials by Country

+
Trials by Country for VENTOLIN HFA
Location Trials
United States 61
Canada 9
United Kingdom 7
China 4
Taiwan 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

+
Trials by US State for VENTOLIN HFA
Location Trials
New York 5
Oregon 4
North Carolina 3
Nebraska 3
Florida 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for VENTOLIN HFA

Clinical Trial Phase

28.6%28.6%8.2%34.7%04681012141618Phase 4Phase 3Phase 2[disabled in preview]
Clinical Trial Phase for VENTOLIN HFA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 14
Phase 3 14
Phase 2 4
[disabled in preview] 17
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

69.4%10.2%8.2%12.2%05101520253035CompletedTerminatedNot yet recruiting[disabled in preview]
Clinical Trial Status for VENTOLIN HFA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 34
Terminated 5
Not yet recruiting 4
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for VENTOLIN HFA

Sponsor Name

trials012345678GlaxoSmithKlineAstraZenecaALK-Abelló A/S[disabled in preview]
Sponsor Name for VENTOLIN HFA
Sponsor Trials
GlaxoSmithKline 8
AstraZeneca 4
ALK-Abelló A/S 2
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

66.3%32.6%00102030405060OtherIndustryNIH[disabled in preview]
Sponsor Type for VENTOLIN HFA
Sponsor Trials
Other 57
Industry 28
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Ventolin HFA: Clinical Trials, Market Analysis, and Projections

Introduction to Ventolin HFA

Ventolin HFA, a metered-dose inhaler (MDI) containing the active ingredient albuterol, is a widely used medication for the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Here, we will delve into the clinical trials, market analysis, and future projections for Ventolin HFA.

Clinical Trials and Efficacy

Transition from CFC to HFA Propellant

The transition from chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) to hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) propellants in Ventolin inhalers was driven by environmental concerns. Clinical trials have consistently shown that Ventolin HFA maintains comparable efficacy and safety to the CFC version.

  • A multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial involving 313 patients with asthma demonstrated that switching from Ventolin CFC to Ventolin HFA did not compromise asthma control or safety. Both Ventolin treatments showed significant improvements in pulmonary function compared to the placebo group[1][4].

  • In children aged 4 to 11 years with persistent asthma, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial found that Ventolin HFA produced bronchodilation comparable to Ventolin CFC, with no significant differences in postdose increases in pulmonary function or safety profiles[4].

Safety Profile

The safety profile of Ventolin HFA has been extensively evaluated and found to be similar to that of Ventolin CFC. Adverse event rates were comparable across both Ventolin groups and the placebo group, with common adverse events including headache and upper respiratory tract infections. There were no clinically relevant effects on ECG, vital signs, or clinical laboratory tests[1][4].

Market Analysis

Current Market Size and Growth

The global bronchodilators market, which includes Ventolin HFA, was estimated at USD 22.19 billion in 2022. This market is expected to expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 3.29% from 2023 to 2030, reaching USD 28.75 billion by 2030[5].

Market Segments and Trends

Beta-adrenergic bronchodilators, which include albuterol (Ventolin HFA), dominate the market with a share of over 40%. This segment is expected to grow at the fastest CAGR during the forecast period. The increasing prevalence of respiratory diseases such as asthma and COPD, along with growing awareness and diagnosis, drives the demand for albuterol medications[3][5].

Competitive Landscape

The bronchodilators market is competitive, with several major products in the short-acting category, including levalbuterol (Xopenex HFA), albuterol (Proair HFA, Proventil HFA, AccuNeb, Ventolin HFA), and epinephrine injection. Recent developments, such as the PT027 (Albuterol/Budesonide Fixed-Dose Combo) by AstraZeneca and Avillion, also contribute to the market dynamics[5].

Future Projections and Sustainability Efforts

Low-Carbon Ventolin Inhaler

GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) is planning to start late-stage trials of a low-carbon version of Ventolin in 2024, utilizing a next-generation propellant. This new formulation has the potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from Ventolin use by approximately 90%. If successful, GSK could begin regulatory submissions for the new Ventolin inhaler in 2025[2].

Environmental Impact and Manufacturing

The development of a low-carbon inhaler is part of GSK’s broader commitment to sustainability, aiming to cut carbon emissions by 80% by 2030 and 90% by 2045. The company is investing £1 billion between 2020 and 2030 to achieve these targets. The new manufacturing facility in Evreux, France, will be leveraged to produce the low-carbon inhaler, ensuring quick supply if the product is approved[2].

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Efficacy: Ventolin HFA has been shown to be clinically comparable to Ventolin CFC in terms of efficacy and safety in multiple clinical trials.
  • Market Growth: The global bronchodilators market, driven by the increasing prevalence of respiratory diseases, is expected to grow at a CAGR of 3.29% from 2023 to 2030.
  • Sustainability: GSK is developing a low-carbon version of Ventolin, which could significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions and align with the company’s sustainability goals.

FAQs

Q: What is the main difference between Ventolin CFC and Ventolin HFA?

A: The main difference is the propellant used; Ventolin CFC uses chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) propellants, while Ventolin HFA uses hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) propellants, which are more environmentally friendly.

Q: Are there any significant differences in efficacy between Ventolin CFC and Ventolin HFA?

A: No, clinical trials have shown that Ventolin HFA maintains comparable efficacy and safety to Ventolin CFC in patients with asthma[1][4].

Q: What is the expected market size of the bronchodilators market by 2030?

A: The global bronchodilators market is expected to reach USD 28.75 billion by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 3.29% from 2023 to 2030[5].

Q: Why is GSK developing a low-carbon version of Ventolin?

A: GSK aims to reduce its carbon footprint significantly, with the new low-carbon Ventolin inhaler expected to cut greenhouse gas emissions by approximately 90%. This aligns with GSK’s broader sustainability goals[2].

Q: What are the key drivers of the albuterol market growth?

A: The key drivers include the increasing prevalence of respiratory diseases, growing awareness and diagnosis, lifestyle changes, and government initiatives and healthcare expenditure[3].

Sources

  1. Switching from Ventolin CFC to Ventolin HFA is well tolerated and maintains asthma control. PubMed.
  2. GSK aims to slash carbon emissions with next-generation inhaler. FiercePharma.
  3. Global Albuterol Market – Industry Trends and Forecast to 2030. Data Bridge Market Research.
  4. Clinical Comparability of Ventolin Formulated With HFA Propellant. JAMA Network.
  5. Bronchodilators Market Size & Trends Analysis Report, 2030. Grand View Research.

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.