You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 7, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ERYTHROMYCIN STEARATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for erythromycin stearate

Trial IDTitleStatusSponsorPhaseStart DateSummary
NCT02528981 ↗ Effect of Probiotics on GBS Colonization Status During Pregnancy: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Completed Chr Hansen N/A 2015-08-01 Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is the leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality in Canada. It may be passed from a study participant colonized in the genital tract by GBS to their baby during vaginal birth. While approximately 10 to 30% of pregnant people harbour GBS in the vagina or rectum, the incidence of neonatal GBS disease is 1 to 2 infants per 1000 births. The use of intrapartum antibiotics to treat colonized individuals with or without risk factors has led to a 70% decline in the incidence of early-onset GBS sepsis in the past decade. Despite this impressive decline, antibiotic resistance has become a major public health concern. Association between intrapartum antibiotic use and ampicillin resistance in E. coli isolated from neonates has previously been documented. Furthermore, while GBS has remained sensitive to penicillin, 20% are resistant to erythromycin and clindamycin, which are alternate drugs for patients allergic to penicillin. Alternative approaches are therefore needed to reduce the risk of GBS infection. We therefore propose to study the use of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and Lactobacillus reuteri RC-14 (Lactobacillus fermentum RC-14) in the colonization status of GBS in pregnant people. Lactobacilli are part of normal gut and vaginal flora and have been widely used as probiotics to treat various conditions. In particular, these two strains have shown to be beneficial in the treatment of urinary tract infections and bacterial vaginosis. Our study design involves recruiting two hundred pregnant people (one hundred in each arm) through various midwifery practices in the GTA at the end of their first trimester of pregnancy. These individuals will be randomized to receive probiotics or placebo for twelve weeks of their pregnancies and will be cultured before delivery to determine their colonization status. The capsules with probiotics and placebo will be provided free of charge. The study design was chosen to minimize the cost and clients' visits to the clinic as vaginal/rectal swabs are routinely offered at 35-37 weeks of gestation.
NCT02528981 ↗ Effect of Probiotics on GBS Colonization Status During Pregnancy: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Completed Chr Hansen A/S N/A 2015-08-01 Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is the leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality in Canada. It may be passed from a study participant colonized in the genital tract by GBS to their baby during vaginal birth. While approximately 10 to 30% of pregnant people harbour GBS in the vagina or rectum, the incidence of neonatal GBS disease is 1 to 2 infants per 1000 births. The use of intrapartum antibiotics to treat colonized individuals with or without risk factors has led to a 70% decline in the incidence of early-onset GBS sepsis in the past decade. Despite this impressive decline, antibiotic resistance has become a major public health concern. Association between intrapartum antibiotic use and ampicillin resistance in E. coli isolated from neonates has previously been documented. Furthermore, while GBS has remained sensitive to penicillin, 20% are resistant to erythromycin and clindamycin, which are alternate drugs for patients allergic to penicillin. Alternative approaches are therefore needed to reduce the risk of GBS infection. We therefore propose to study the use of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and Lactobacillus reuteri RC-14 (Lactobacillus fermentum RC-14) in the colonization status of GBS in pregnant people. Lactobacilli are part of normal gut and vaginal flora and have been widely used as probiotics to treat various conditions. In particular, these two strains have shown to be beneficial in the treatment of urinary tract infections and bacterial vaginosis. Our study design involves recruiting two hundred pregnant people (one hundred in each arm) through various midwifery practices in the GTA at the end of their first trimester of pregnancy. These individuals will be randomized to receive probiotics or placebo for twelve weeks of their pregnancies and will be cultured before delivery to determine their colonization status. The capsules with probiotics and placebo will be provided free of charge. The study design was chosen to minimize the cost and clients' visits to the clinic as vaginal/rectal swabs are routinely offered at 35-37 weeks of gestation.
NCT02528981 ↗ Effect of Probiotics on GBS Colonization Status During Pregnancy: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Completed Ryerson University N/A 2015-08-01 Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is the leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality in Canada. It may be passed from a study participant colonized in the genital tract by GBS to their baby during vaginal birth. While approximately 10 to 30% of pregnant people harbour GBS in the vagina or rectum, the incidence of neonatal GBS disease is 1 to 2 infants per 1000 births. The use of intrapartum antibiotics to treat colonized individuals with or without risk factors has led to a 70% decline in the incidence of early-onset GBS sepsis in the past decade. Despite this impressive decline, antibiotic resistance has become a major public health concern. Association between intrapartum antibiotic use and ampicillin resistance in E. coli isolated from neonates has previously been documented. Furthermore, while GBS has remained sensitive to penicillin, 20% are resistant to erythromycin and clindamycin, which are alternate drugs for patients allergic to penicillin. Alternative approaches are therefore needed to reduce the risk of GBS infection. We therefore propose to study the use of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and Lactobacillus reuteri RC-14 (Lactobacillus fermentum RC-14) in the colonization status of GBS in pregnant people. Lactobacilli are part of normal gut and vaginal flora and have been widely used as probiotics to treat various conditions. In particular, these two strains have shown to be beneficial in the treatment of urinary tract infections and bacterial vaginosis. Our study design involves recruiting two hundred pregnant people (one hundred in each arm) through various midwifery practices in the GTA at the end of their first trimester of pregnancy. These individuals will be randomized to receive probiotics or placebo for twelve weeks of their pregnancies and will be cultured before delivery to determine their colonization status. The capsules with probiotics and placebo will be provided free of charge. The study design was chosen to minimize the cost and clients' visits to the clinic as vaginal/rectal swabs are routinely offered at 35-37 weeks of gestation.
>Trial ID>Title>Status>Phase>Start Date>Summary
Showing 1 to 3 of 3 entries

Clinical Trial Conditions for erythromycin stearate

Condition Name

10-0.100.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.911.1Group B Streptococcal Infection[disabled in preview]
Condition Name for erythromycin stearate
Intervention Trials
Group B Streptococcal Infection 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

10-0.100.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.911.1Streptococcal Infections[disabled in preview]
Condition MeSH for erythromycin stearate
Intervention Trials
Streptococcal Infections 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for erythromycin stearate

Trials by Country

+
Trials by Country for erythromycin stearate
Location Trials
Canada 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for erythromycin stearate

Clinical Trial Phase

100.0%0-0.100.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.911.1N/A[disabled in preview]
Clinical Trial Phase for erythromycin stearate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
N/A 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

100.0%0-0.100.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.911.1Completed[disabled in preview]
Clinical Trial Status for erythromycin stearate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for erythromycin stearate

Sponsor Name

trials000001111111Chr Hansen A/SRyerson UniversityChr Hansen[disabled in preview]
Sponsor Name for erythromycin stearate
Sponsor Trials
Chr Hansen A/S 1
Ryerson University 1
Chr Hansen 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

66.7%33.3%0-0.200.20.40.60.811.21.41.61.822.2IndustryOther[disabled in preview]
Sponsor Type for erythromycin stearate
Sponsor Trials
Industry 2
Other 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Erythromycin Stearate: Clinical Trials, Market Analysis, and Projections

Introduction to Erythromycin Stearate

Erythromycin stearate is a widely used antibiotic that targets the 50S subunit of bacterial ribosomes, disrupting protein synthesis and leading to bacterial cell death. It is effective against a range of bacterial infections, including respiratory tract infections, skin infections, and sexually transmitted diseases.

Clinical Trials and Efficacy

Comparative Studies

In a multicentre, double-blind randomized trial, the efficacy and tolerance of clarithromycin (a derivative of erythromycin) and erythromycin stearate were compared in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. The study found that clarithromycin was at least as effective as erythromycin stearate and was better tolerated, with fewer gastrointestinal side effects[1].

Long-term Use

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the clinical efficacy of long-term, low-dose erythromycin in patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. The study showed that erythromycin significantly reduced pulmonary exacerbations and protected against lung function decline over a 12-month period. However, it also increased the proportion of macrolide-resistant oropharyngeal streptococci[3].

Market Analysis

Current Market Value and Growth Projections

The global erythromycin market was valued at USD 15.3 billion in 2023 and is projected to grow to USD 26.0 billion by 2033, with a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 5.6% during the forecast period from 2024 to 2033[2][4].

Product Type and Application Analysis

Erythromycin tablets lead the market with a 47.3% share, primarily due to their effectiveness. Respiratory tract infections account for 38.9% of the market demand, driven by high incidence rates. Hospital pharmacies dominate the distribution channels, accounting for 53.7% of the market, while hospitals are the major end-users, constituting 61.2% of the market[2].

Regional Analysis

North America leads the erythromycin market with a 35% share, driven by robust healthcare infrastructure and high healthcare expenditure. Europe also holds a significant share, supported by a well-established pharmaceutical industry and a high prevalence of bacterial infections. The Asia Pacific region exhibits rapid growth due to rising healthcare expenditure and increasing awareness of infectious diseases[2][4].

Growth Opportunities

Expansion in Emerging Markets

Expansion in emerging markets, such as India and other developing countries, presents significant growth opportunities. These regions are experiencing rapid improvements in healthcare access and a growing pharmaceutical market. Erythromycin can serve as a cost-effective alternative to newer, more expensive antibiotics, making it an attractive option in these markets[2].

Development of Combination Therapies

The development of combination therapies, such as combining erythromycin with prokinetic agents for treating gastrointestinal motility disorders, offers a promising growth opportunity. This can expand erythromycin's market beyond its traditional antibiotic role and attract a broader patient base[2].

Personalized Medicine Approaches

Personalized medicine approaches, involving genetic testing to determine an individual's likelihood of experiencing side effects or predicting the effectiveness of erythromycin against specific bacterial strains, are trending. This targeted use can enhance the efficacy and safety profile of erythromycin, potentially expanding its market in specific patient populations[2].

Challenges and Restraining Factors

Antibiotic Stewardship Initiatives

Efforts to promote antibiotic stewardship and curb overuse pose a challenge to the growth of the erythromycin market. These initiatives aim to reduce the misuse of antibiotics, which can impact market demand[4].

Rising Concerns Regarding Side Effects

Growing awareness of potential side effects associated with erythromycin and other antibiotics may dampen consumer confidence and adoption. Gastrointestinal side effects, in particular, have been a significant concern in clinical trials[1][4].

Market Saturation

The market for erythromycin faces saturation in some regions, limiting opportunities for significant expansion. This saturation can make it challenging for companies to achieve substantial growth in these areas[4].

Research and Development Innovations

Erythromycin stearate, as a small molecule drug, offers several advantages, including easy absorption and distribution within the body, enhancing its therapeutic effects. The well-established manufacturing processes for small molecule drugs make them more cost-effective to produce[5].

The target 50S subunit of bacterial ribosomes shows promising development potential, with a focus on addressing bacterial infections and other related indications. There are numerous clinical trials and research activities involving drugs targeting this subunit, indicating a dynamic and evolving landscape for future drug development[5].

Key Takeaways

  • Market Growth: The global erythromycin market is projected to grow from USD 15.3 billion in 2023 to USD 26.0 billion by 2033, with a CAGR of 5.6%.
  • Clinical Efficacy: Erythromycin has shown significant clinical efficacy in treating various bacterial infections, including respiratory tract infections and non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis.
  • Growth Opportunities: Expansion in emerging markets, development of combination therapies, and personalized medicine approaches offer substantial growth opportunities.
  • Challenges: Antibiotic stewardship initiatives, rising concerns about side effects, and market saturation are key challenges to market growth.

FAQs

What is the current market value of the erythromycin market?

The global erythromycin market was valued at USD 15.3 billion in 2023[2].

What is the projected growth rate of the erythromycin market?

The erythromycin market is expected to grow at a CAGR of 5.6% from 2024 to 2033[2].

What are the primary applications of erythromycin?

Erythromycin is primarily used to treat respiratory tract infections, skin infections, and sexually transmitted diseases[2].

What are the main challenges facing the erythromycin market?

The main challenges include antibiotic stewardship initiatives, rising concerns about side effects, and market saturation in some regions[4].

How does erythromycin compare to other antibiotics in clinical trials?

Erythromycin has been shown to be at least as effective as other antibiotics like clarithromycin, with better tolerance in some cases[1].

Sources

  1. PubMed: A comparative safety and efficacy study of clarithromycin and erythromycin stearate in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.
  2. Marketresearch.biz: Erythromycin Market Size, Share, Growth | CAGR of 5.6%.
  3. JAMA Network: Effect of Long-term, Low-Dose Erythromycin on Pulmonary Exacerbations in Patients With Non-CF Bronchiectasis.
  4. PharmiWeb: Erythromycin Market Projected to Reach Valuation of USD 8,194.9 Mn at 5.5% CAGR from 2024-2033.
  5. Patsnap Synapse: A Comprehensive Review of erythromycin stearate's R&D innovations.

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.