CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR LEVONORDEFRIN; MEPIVACAINE HYDROCHLORIDE
✉ Email this page to a colleague
All Clinical Trials for levonordefrin; mepivacaine hydrochloride
Trial ID | Title | Status | Sponsor | Phase | Start Date | Summary |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NCT00154167 ↗ | Safety and Efficacy Study of NV-101 in Dental Patients | Completed | Novalar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Phase 2 | 2003-02-01 | The purpose of this study was: - to determine if NV-101 accelerates recovery from numbness compared to placebo - to evaluate safety of NV-101 |
NCT02603198 ↗ | 2%-Mepivacaine With Two Different Vasoconstrictors Solutions in Third Molar Surgery a Comparative Study | Unknown status | University of Sao Paulo | N/A | 2014-08-01 | Dental treatments, particularly third molars extraction, can become extremely uncomfortable and painful. They are associated to anxiety, fear and many other unpleasant sensations. During surgery, patients can present cardiorespiratory repercussions of these sensations. This fact generally justifies the employment of methods of monitoring and appliance of safer therapeutic alternatives. Local anesthetics are the most frequently drugs used in dentistry. Vasoconstrictors, particularly epinephrine, are important components of anesthetic solutions to increased time for anesthetic absorption and consequently increasing the duration of anesthesia. The use of smaller amounts of anesthetic solution can reduce the risk of systemic toxicity, however decrease the total surgical time. It is well known that the amount of epinephrine injected into patients during anesthetic procedures can produce adverse hemodynamic effects. Levonordefrin was adding to dental cartridges promising to reduce cardiac stimulation due it less β activity, and maintain the same clinical and systemic effects. But some studies for maxillary or intraosseous infiltrations showed no difference in heart rate and any anesthetic success over epinephrine. Thus, this study aims to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of anesthetic mepivacaine 2% with epinephrine 1:100,000 or 1:20,000 levonordefrin employing a clinical trial model of third molars extractions in healthy adults. |
NCT04617600 ↗ | Survival Rate After TheraCal PT Pulpotomy Versus MTA Pulpotomy in Children With Vital Primary Molars. | Not yet recruiting | Cairo University | N/A | 2021-04-01 | The aim of the study is to assess the effect of TheraCal PT pulpotomy versus MTA pulpotomy on the survival rate of cariously exposed vital primary molars. |
NCT05582317 ↗ | Efficacy of Combination of Biodentine and Simvastatin as a Pulp Capping Materials in Vital Pulpotomy of Primary Molars | Completed | Suez Canal University | N/A | 2021-05-23 | Objective: This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of combination of biodentine with simvastatin as a pulpotomy agent for vital primary molars clinically and radiographically. Study design: 60 primary molars in 20 children aged 4-7 years old were randomly allocated to three groups, Biodentine, Simvastatin and combination of Biodentine and simvastatin. Clinical and radiographic examinations were conducted at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after treatment. Key words: Pulpotomy, Primary teeth, Biodentine, Simvastatin. |
>Trial ID | >Title | >Status | >Sponsor | >Phase | >Start Date | >Summary |
Clinical Trial Conditions for levonordefrin; mepivacaine hydrochloride
Condition Name
Clinical Trial Locations for levonordefrin; mepivacaine hydrochloride
Trials by Country
Clinical Trial Progress for levonordefrin; mepivacaine hydrochloride
Clinical Trial Phase
Clinical Trial Sponsors for levonordefrin; mepivacaine hydrochloride
Sponsor Name