You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 9, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR MOMETASONE FUROATE; OLOPATADINE HYDROCHLORIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for mometasone furoate; olopatadine hydrochloride

Trial IDTitleStatusSponsorPhaseStart DateSummary
NCT06126952 ↗ Azelastine Allergen Chamber - Onset of Action Study Completed MEDA Pharma GmbH & Co. KG Phase 2 2023-10-30 This study is to assess the Onset of Action and Efficacy of azelastine hydrochloride 0.15% in treating the nasal symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) induced by an allergen challenge in an Environmental Exposure Unit (EEU) followed by a single dose and a 3-day treatment at home.
NCT02870205 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of GSP 301 Nasal Spray in the Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR) Completed Glenmark Specialty S.A. Phase 3 2016-08-01 Study to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of GSP 301 NS compared with placebo NS and individual monotherapy formulations for the treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (subjects 12 years of age and older)
NCT03444506 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of Fixed Dose Combination (FDC) of Olopatadine Hydrochloride and Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (Molo; Also Referred as GSP 301) in the Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR) Completed Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. India Phase 2 2014-01-27 A single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of FDC olopatadine hydrochloride and mometasone furoate nasal spray (Molo; also referred as GSP 301) was conducted in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis. In this study, the efficacy and safety of two regimens (BID and QD) of the FDC (i.e. Molo 1 and Molo 2) were evaluated compared to placebo nasal spray, DYMISTA® and PATANASE®.
>Trial ID>Title>Status>Phase>Start Date>Summary
Showing 1 to 3 of 3 entries

Clinical Trial Conditions for mometasone furoate; olopatadine hydrochloride

Condition Name

210-0.200.20.40.60.811.21.41.61.822.2Seasonal Allergic RhinitisSeasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR)[disabled in preview]
Condition Name for mometasone furoate; olopatadine hydrochloride
Intervention Trials
Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis 2
Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR) 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

333000.511.522.53Rhinitis, Allergic, SeasonalRhinitis, AllergicRhinitis[disabled in preview]
Condition MeSH for mometasone furoate; olopatadine hydrochloride
Intervention Trials
Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal 3
Rhinitis, Allergic 3
Rhinitis 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for mometasone furoate; olopatadine hydrochloride

Trials by Country

+
Trials by Country for mometasone furoate; olopatadine hydrochloride
Location Trials
United States 18
Canada 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

+
Trials by US State for mometasone furoate; olopatadine hydrochloride
Location Trials
Wisconsin 1
Utah 1
Texas 1
South Carolina 1
Pennsylvania 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for mometasone furoate; olopatadine hydrochloride

Clinical Trial Phase

33.3%66.7%0-0.200.20.40.60.811.21.41.61.822.2Phase 3Phase 2[disabled in preview]
Clinical Trial Phase for mometasone furoate; olopatadine hydrochloride
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 3 1
Phase 2 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

100.0%000.511.522.53Completed[disabled in preview]
Clinical Trial Status for mometasone furoate; olopatadine hydrochloride
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for mometasone furoate; olopatadine hydrochloride

Sponsor Name

trials000001111111Glenmark Specialty S.A.Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. IndiaMEDA Pharma GmbH & Co. KG[disabled in preview]
Sponsor Name for mometasone furoate; olopatadine hydrochloride
Sponsor Trials
Glenmark Specialty S.A. 1
Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. India 1
MEDA Pharma GmbH & Co. KG 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

100.0%000.511.522.53Industry[disabled in preview]
Sponsor Type for mometasone furoate; olopatadine hydrochloride
Sponsor Trials
Industry 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

MOMETASONE FUROATE; OLOPATADINE HYDROCHLORIDE: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projections

Introduction

The fixed-dose combination (FDC) of mometasone furoate and olopatadine hydrochloride, marketed as Ryaltris, has been a subject of extensive clinical trials and regulatory evaluations. This combination aims to treat symptoms associated with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) by leveraging the anti-inflammatory properties of mometasone furoate and the antihistamine effects of olopatadine hydrochloride.

Clinical Trials Overview

Efficacy and Safety in Adults and Adolescents

Clinical trials, including phase 3 studies (GSP301-305), have evaluated the efficacy and safety of olopatadine-mometasone nasal spray in patients aged 12 years and older with moderate to severe SAR. These studies compared the FDC to placebo and individual monotherapies (olopatadine hydrochloride and mometasone furoate nasal sprays). The results showed that while the FDC provided statistically significant improvements in nasal symptoms compared to placebo, the benefits were often not clinically meaningful when compared to mometasone nasal spray alone[1][4].

Efficacy and Safety in Children

In children aged 6 to less than 12 years, the FDC demonstrated statistically significant improvements in nasal symptoms but not in ocular symptoms compared to placebo. However, the between-group differences were not considered clinically meaningful[1].

Pharmacological Rationale

The combination of an antihistamine (olopatadine hydrochloride) and a corticosteroid (mometasone furoate) is pharmacologically rational for treating allergic rhinitis, as it addresses both anti-allergic and anti-inflammatory needs. Studies in guinea pigs have shown that olopatadine primarily inhibits sneezing, while mometasone furoate reduces nasal inflammation and eosinophilia[3].

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics

Systemic Exposure

Pharmacokinetic studies have shown that systemic exposure to mometasone furoate is minimal, often below the level of quantification. Olopatadine, however, shows measurable systemic exposure, though it is not considered to have significant clinical implications at therapeutic doses[3].

Bioavailability and Population PK Analysis

Studies in healthy subjects and patients with SAR have evaluated the bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of the FDC. Population pharmacokinetic analysis has been conducted to understand the systemic exposure of both active ingredients when administered together[3].

Regulatory Status

Approval and Indications

Ryaltris has been approved in several countries, including Australia, for the treatment of symptoms associated with SAR. The product is available in various metered dose presentations and contains 600 µg of olopatadine hydrochloride and 25 µg of mometasone furoate per actuation[2].

Reimbursement Recommendations

In Canada, the Canadian Drug Expert Committee (CDEC) has evaluated the FDC for reimbursement. While the committee acknowledged some benefits over placebo, it noted inconsistent and often not clinically meaningful improvements compared to mometasone nasal spray alone. The committee also highlighted a lack of direct comparative evidence against other treatments for SAR[1].

Market Analysis

Market Need and Competition

The market for SAR treatments is competitive, with various intranasal corticosteroids and oral antihistamines available. The FDC of olopatadine and mometasone aims to fill a niche by offering a single product that combines both anti-allergic and anti-inflammatory effects. However, the lack of clinically meaningful improvements over existing monotherapies may impact its market adoption[1][5].

Patient Adherence

There is no evidence that the FDC improves patient adherence, which is a critical factor in the management of chronic conditions like SAR. This could be a significant consideration for healthcare providers and patients when choosing a treatment option[1].

Projections and Future Outlook

Market Potential

Despite the mixed clinical trial results, Ryaltris has the potential to capture a segment of the SAR treatment market due to its convenience and the combined action of its active ingredients. However, its market share will depend on how it is positioned against existing treatments and how it addresses the unmet needs identified in clinical evaluations[1][5].

Future Research Directions

Future studies should focus on direct comparative trials against other commonly used SAR treatments to better establish the FDC's place in the treatment landscape. Additionally, exploring ways to enhance patient adherence and demonstrating clinically meaningful improvements in quality of life could strengthen its market position[1][4].

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Efficacy: The FDC of olopatadine and mometasone shows statistically significant improvements in nasal symptoms but often lacks clinically meaningful benefits compared to monotherapies.
  • Regulatory Status: Approved in several countries for SAR treatment, but reimbursement recommendations vary based on clinical evidence.
  • Market Analysis: Faces competition from existing treatments; convenience and combined action are key selling points.
  • Future Outlook: Needs direct comparative trials and strategies to improve patient adherence.

FAQs

What are the active ingredients in Ryaltris?

Ryaltris contains olopatadine hydrochloride (an antihistamine) and mometasone furoate (a corticosteroid)[2].

What is the primary indication for Ryaltris?

Ryaltris is indicated for the treatment of symptoms associated with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR)[2].

How does the combination of olopatadine and mometasone work?

Olopatadine primarily inhibits sneezing and other allergic symptoms, while mometasone furoate reduces nasal inflammation and eosinophilia[3].

What were the findings of the clinical trials for Ryaltris?

Clinical trials showed statistically significant improvements in nasal symptoms compared to placebo, but often not clinically meaningful improvements compared to mometasone nasal spray alone[1][4].

Is Ryaltris approved for use in children?

Yes, Ryaltris is approved for use in children aged 6 to less than 12 years, although it did not show significant improvements in ocular symptoms in this age group[1].

What are the potential market challenges for Ryaltris?

The lack of clinically meaningful improvements over existing monotherapies and no evidence of improved patient adherence are significant market challenges[1][5].

Sources

  1. Reimbursement Recommendation - Canada's Drug Agency. CDA-AMC Canadian Drug Expert Committee (CDEC).
  2. Australian Public Assessment Report for Ryaltris. Therapeutic Goods Administration.
  3. Public Assessment Report Scientific discussion Ryaltris. Swedish Medical Products Agency.
  4. Efficacy and safety of twice-daily and once-daily olopatadine/mometasone furoate nasal spray in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. PubMed.
  5. Intranasal combo: fixed-dose combination of mometasone furoate and olopatadine hydrochloride. Otolaryngology PL.

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.