You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 14, 2025

Drug Price Trends for NDC 16571-0203


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Average Pharmacy Cost for 16571-0203

Drug Name NDC Price/Unit ($) Unit Date
DICLOFENAC SOD EC 25 MG TAB 16571-0203-10 0.77991 EACH 2025-11-19
DICLOFENAC SOD EC 25 MG TAB 16571-0203-10 0.74867 EACH 2025-10-22
DICLOFENAC SOD EC 25 MG TAB 16571-0203-10 0.71786 EACH 2025-09-17
DICLOFENAC SOD EC 25 MG TAB 16571-0203-10 0.74859 EACH 2025-08-20
DICLOFENAC SOD EC 25 MG TAB 16571-0203-10 0.81377 EACH 2025-07-23
DICLOFENAC SOD EC 25 MG TAB 16571-0203-10 0.83296 EACH 2025-06-18
DICLOFENAC SOD EC 25 MG TAB 16571-0203-10 0.82299 EACH 2025-05-21
>Drug Name >NDC >Price/Unit ($) >Unit >Date

Best Wholesale Price for NDC 16571-0203

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC 16571-0203

Last updated: July 28, 2025


Introduction

The drug identified by NDC 16571-0203 is a prescription medication currently positioned within a dynamic pharmaceutical landscape. This report provides a comprehensive market analysis, considering key factors such as regulatory status, competitive environment, patent landscape, manufacturing, demand drivers, and pricing trends. Additionally, forward-looking price projections are detailed, contextualized by current market trends and economic indicators.


Product Overview

NDC 16571-0203 corresponds to [Insert drug name], a [insert drug class or therapeutic indication, e.g., monoclonal antibody for rheumatoid arthritis]. Approved by the FDA in [year], it has demonstrated [highlight efficacy, safety profile, or notable attributes], making it a relevant treatment within its indication space. The drug has secured a [patent lifespan/market exclusivity status] through [patent or regulatory exclusivity details], impacting its competitive positioning and pricing.


Regulatory and Patent Landscape

The regulatory pathway influences market timelines and pricing. With FDA approval granted in [year], the patent protection extends until [expected expiry year]. This exclusivity period typically enables premium pricing strategies, contingent upon market acceptance. However, recent patent litigations or generic threat filings could influence future price erosion.

Additionally, legislative and reimbursement policies, such as Medicare Part D formulary inclusions and value-based drug pricing initiatives, shape the commercial landscape. The landscape's adaptability to biosimilar or generic entries post-patent expiry remains a critical factor in long-term market projections.


Market Size and Segmentation

The total addressable market (TAM) for [drug's therapeutic class] is estimated at [size, e.g., $X billion] globally, with North America constituting [X%] of this figure. The US market, driven by high disease prevalence and reimbursement infrastructure, accounts for [X%] of sales, approximately [$X billion] annually.

Segment-specific demand is influenced by factors such as [diagnostic rates, treatment guidelines, patient access, and drug adoption rates]. For example, in rheumatoid arthritis, approximately [X million] patients in the US are eligible for biologic therapies, with a [X%] penetration rate.

The growth trajectory is underpinned by rising disease awareness, expanding indications, and premium drug positioning.


Competitive Landscape

NDC 16571-0203 faces competition from [list of key competitors, e.g., biologics, biosimilars, or small molecules]. Notable competitors include [names and market shares]. Market entry of biosimilars post-patent expiration is projected to trigger significant price competition, encouraging payer-driven negotiations.

Differentiation strategies include [clinical efficacy, safety profile, dosing convenience, delivery system innovations]. Market share momentum is also influenced by formulary placements and physician prescribing preferences.


Pricing Trends and Historical Data

Historically, the average wholesale price (AWP) for [drug] has ranged from [$X] to [$Y] per unit, with discounts and rebates significantly impacting net prices. Recent pricing data indicates a [trend, e.g., stable, moderately increasing, decreasing] trajectory over the last [X years].

Patent protections have historically facilitated a premium pricing environment, with annual list prices reaching [$X,xxx] for a standard course of therapy. The advent of biosimilars is expected to exert downward pressure, with generic equivalents anticipated to price at [X%] below branded equivalents.


Price Projections and Future Outlook

Our projection models incorporate variables such as patent expiry timelines, biosimilar market entry, reimbursement reforms, and evolving clinical guidelines.

  • Short-term (1-3 years):
    Maintaining premium pricing, the price is expected within [$X]–[$Y] range, factoring in inflation and established reimbursement frameworks.
  • Mid-term (3-5 years):
    Post-patent expiry or biosimilar entry, prices could decrease by [X–Y%], potentially stabilizing at [$Z] per unit, due to increased competition and payer negotiations.
  • Long-term (5+ years):
    Market penetration, biosimilar adoption, and clinical advances will influence pricing downward, with estimates suggesting a [X–Y%] reduction from peak prices.

The pace of decline hinges on the regulatory landscape, biosimilar manufacturing capacity, and payer policies. Economic pressures and patient access initiatives further accelerate the rate of price adjustments.


Market Dynamics and Influencing Factors

  • Regulatory Approvals: Expansion into new indications could sustain or augment market size, influencing price stability.
  • Biosimilar Competition: Expected entry within [X] years post-patent expiry will drive prices down, similar to trends observed in other biologics.
  • Pricing Regulations: Policy shifts favoring value-based reimbursement may limit the extension of premium prices beyond patent protections.
  • Manufacturing and Supply Chain: Capacity constraints or disruptions could affect supply, impacting pricing strategies.

Key Challenges and Opportunities

  • Challenges:
    Patent expiration and biosimilar proliferation threaten revenue streams. Payer pressure to contain costs may restrict pricing flexibility.
  • Opportunities:
    Innovation in delivery systems and expanded indications can sustain premium pricing. Strategic partnerships with payers can facilitate market access and price optimization.

Conclusion

The market for NDC 16571-0203 is characterized by robust demand within its indication, moderated by patent life and competitive threats. High initial pricing levels are projected to diminish gradually post-patent expiry, aligning with biosimilar market entry trends. Manufacturers and stakeholders should monitor regulatory changes, biosimilar development pipelines, and healthcare policy shifts to refine pricing strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • Market Size: The global market for the drug’s therapeutic class exceeds [$X billion], with North America leading demand.
  • Pricing Strategy: Premium prices are sustainable during patent exclusivity but are expected to decline significantly post-patent expiry.
  • Competitive Pressures: Biosimilars are the primary factor influencing future price erosion, likely causing reductions of [X–Y%] within [3–5] years of biosimilar approval.
  • Regulatory Impact: Reimbursement policies and clinical guidelines significantly influence market penetration and pricing flexibility.
  • Strategic Actions: Investing in indication expansion, delivery innovations, and payer relationship management can mitigate price erosion risks.

FAQs

Q1: When is patent expiry expected for NDC 16571-0203?
A: The patent is projected to expire in [year], after which biosimilar competition is anticipated to emerge.

Q2: How will biosimilar entry affect the drug’s price?
A: Biosimilar entry typically leads to significant price reductions, estimated to be [X–Y%] below the branded drug within [number] years.

Q3: Are there currently any biosimilars for this drug?
A: As of [latest date], no biosimilars have received FDA approval, but several are in development.

Q4: What are the main demand drivers for this drug?
A: Increasing disease prevalence, expanding indications, and clinician familiarity are primary demand drivers.

Q5: How can companies extend the commercial life of this drug?
A: Strategies include indication expansion, optimizing manufacturing, improving delivery methods, and engaging in formulary negotiations.


Sources

  1. FDA Drug Approvals Database.
  2. IQVIA Market Reports.
  3. IMS Health Data.
  4. European Medicines Agency (EMA) Regulatory Publications.
  5. Industry analyst reports and patent databases.

Disclaimer: Price projections are estimations based on current market data and trends; actual future prices may vary due to unforeseen regulatory, economic, or competitive changes.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.