You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 24, 2024

LEVOMETHADYL ACETATE HYDROCHLORIDE - Generic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What are the generic sources for levomethadyl acetate hydrochloride and what is the scope of freedom to operate?

Levomethadyl acetate hydrochloride is the generic ingredient in one branded drug marketed by Roxane and is included in one NDA. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.

There is one drug master file entry for levomethadyl acetate hydrochloride.

Summary for LEVOMETHADYL ACETATE HYDROCHLORIDE
Recent Clinical Trials for LEVOMETHADYL ACETATE HYDROCHLORIDE

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical CenterN/A

See all LEVOMETHADYL ACETATE HYDROCHLORIDE clinical trials

US Patents and Regulatory Information for LEVOMETHADYL ACETATE HYDROCHLORIDE

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Roxane ORLAAM levomethadyl acetate hydrochloride CONCENTRATE;ORAL 020315-001 Jul 9, 1993 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

LEVOMETHADYL ACETATE HYDROCHLORIDE Market Analysis and Financial Projection Experimental

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory of Levomethadyl Acetate Hydrochloride (LAAM)

Introduction

Levomethadyl acetate hydrochloride, commonly known as LAAM or OrLAAM, is a synthetic opioid agonist approved for the treatment of opioid dependence. Here, we will delve into the market dynamics and financial trajectory of this drug, highlighting its approval, usage, challenges, and eventual withdrawal from the market.

Approval and Initial Market Presence

LAAM was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1993 for the treatment of opioid dependence. At the time of its approval, it was seen as a promising alternative to methadone due to its longer half-life, allowing for less frequent dosing (typically two to three times a week)[3].

Clinical Use and Efficacy

LAAM was used as a second-line treatment for patients who did not respond to other opioid dependence treatments like methadone or buprenorphine. Clinical trials showed that LAAM could be effective in reducing illicit opioid use and cravings, although it had lower patient retention rates compared to methadone, particularly during the induction phase[1][2].

Dosage and Administration

The drug was administered orally, with initial doses ranging from 20-40 mg for patients not previously on methadone, and higher doses for those transitioning from methadone. The dosage could be adjusted as needed, but it was crucial to manage the dose carefully to avoid adverse effects[3].

Market Challenges

Despite its efficacy, LAAM faced several challenges in the market. One significant issue was the higher rate of patient dropout during the induction phase, especially with higher doses. This was attributed to increased agonist adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, and drowsiness[1][2].

Safety Concerns

A critical factor that impacted the market dynamics of LAAM was the emergence of safety concerns. Specifically, reports of life-threatening ventricular rhythm disorders, including QT interval prolongation, led to its removal from the European market in 2001. These safety issues also contributed to its eventual discontinuation in the U.S.[3][5].

Financial Trajectory

The financial trajectory of LAAM was marked by a decline following its initial approval. The drug's market presence was limited by its lower patient retention rates and the emergence of safety concerns. By 2003, Roxane Laboratories, Inc., the manufacturer of OrLAAM, discontinued its production in the U.S. due to these issues[3].

Legal Status and Regulatory Impact

LAAM's legal status changed over time. Initially classified as a Schedule I drug before its approval, it was later classified as a Schedule II Narcotic controlled substance in the U.S. However, the regulatory environment became increasingly stringent due to safety concerns, further impacting its market viability[3].

Impact on Public Health

The withdrawal of LAAM from the market had significant implications for public health. Patients who were dependent on opioids had one fewer treatment option, which could exacerbate the opioid crisis. However, the safety of patients was prioritized, reflecting the stringent regulatory standards in place to protect public health[3].

Conclusion

The market dynamics and financial trajectory of levomethadyl acetate hydrochloride were marked by initial promise, followed by significant challenges and eventual withdrawal from the market. The drug's efficacy in treating opioid dependence was overshadowed by safety concerns and lower patient retention rates, leading to its discontinuation.

Key Takeaways

  • Approval and Initial Use: LAAM was approved in 1993 as a treatment for opioid dependence.
  • Clinical Efficacy: Effective in reducing opioid use and cravings but had lower patient retention rates.
  • Safety Concerns: Reports of life-threatening ventricular rhythm disorders led to its removal from the market.
  • Financial Decline: Discontinued in the U.S. in 2003 due to safety issues and lower market viability.
  • Regulatory Impact: Classified as a Schedule II Narcotic controlled substance before its discontinuation.
  • Public Health Impact: Reduced treatment options for opioid-dependent patients.

FAQs

  1. What is levomethadyl acetate hydrochloride (LAAM)?

    • LAAM is a synthetic opioid agonist used for the treatment of opioid dependence.
  2. Why was LAAM discontinued?

    • LAAM was discontinued due to reports of life-threatening ventricular rhythm disorders, including QT interval prolongation.
  3. How was LAAM administered?

    • LAAM was administered orally, typically two to three times a week, due to its longer half-life.
  4. What were the main challenges faced by LAAM in the market?

    • Lower patient retention rates during the induction phase and increased agonist adverse effects were significant challenges.
  5. What is the current legal status of LAAM in the U.S.?

    • Although it is no longer in production, LAAM remains classified as a Schedule II Narcotic controlled substance.

References

  1. Induction With Levomethadyl Acetate: Safety and Efficacy. JAMA Psychiatry.
  2. Induction with levomethadyl acetate: safety and efficacy. PubMed.
  3. Levacetylmethadol. Wikipedia.
  4. BOARD MEETING AGENDA. Oregon State Board of Pharmacy.
  5. Levacetylmethadol: Uses, Interactions, Mechanism of Action. DrugBank.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.