You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 1, 2025

MESTRANOL; NORETHYNODREL - Generic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What are the generic drug sources for mestranol; norethynodrel and what is the scope of freedom to operate?

Mestranol; norethynodrel is the generic ingredient in three branded drugs marketed by Gd Searle Llc and is included in one NDA. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.

Summary for MESTRANOL; NORETHYNODREL
US Patents:0
Tradenames:3
Applicants:1
NDAs:1
Raw Ingredient (Bulk) Api Vendors: 6
Patent Applications: 5
DailyMed Link:MESTRANOL; NORETHYNODREL at DailyMed

US Patents and Regulatory Information for MESTRANOL; NORETHYNODREL

ApplicantTradenameGeneric NameDosageNDAApproval DateTETypeRLDRSPatent No.Patent ExpirationProductSubstanceDelist Req.Exclusivity Expiration
Gd Searle Llc ENOVID mestranol; norethynodrel TABLET;ORAL 010976-005 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Try for Free ⤷  Try for Free ⤷  Try for Free
Gd Searle Llc ENOVID-E mestranol; norethynodrel TABLET;ORAL-20 010976-006 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Try for Free ⤷  Try for Free ⤷  Try for Free
Gd Searle Llc ENOVID-E 21 mestranol; norethynodrel TABLET;ORAL-21 010976-007 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Try for Free ⤷  Try for Free ⤷  Try for Free
Gd Searle Llc ENOVID mestranol; norethynodrel TABLET;ORAL 010976-008 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Try for Free ⤷  Try for Free ⤷  Try for Free
>Applicant>Tradename>Generic Name>Dosage>NDA>Approval Date>TE>Type>RLD>RS>Patent No.>Patent Expiration>Product>Substance>Delist Req.>Exclusivity Expiration
Showing 1 to 4 of 4 entries

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory of Mestranol and Norethynodrel

Introduction

Mestranol and norethynodrel, the components of the first combined oral contraceptive pill (COCP), have a significant history in the pharmaceutical market. Here, we will explore the market dynamics and financial trajectory of these drugs from their inception to the present day.

Historical Context

Early Development and Approval

Mestranol and norethynodrel were first combined in the drug Enovid, developed by Gregory Pincus at G. D. Searle & Company. Enovid was initially approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on June 10, 1957, for the treatment of menstrual disorders. It was later approved as a contraceptive on June 23, 1960[5].

Initial Market Impact

The introduction of Enovid marked a significant milestone in reproductive health. By 1960, it was already being used by over 0.5 million women in the United States, despite not being legally prescribable as a contraceptive nationwide until the Eisenstadt v. Baird ruling in 1972[5].

Market Expansion and Global Reach

Early Adoption

In the early 1960s, Enovid was approved in the UK and Canada, and by the mid-1960s, it had spread to continental Europe and Latin America. By the early 1970s, over 25% of women of child-bearing age in many developed countries were using combined hormonal contraceptives, including those containing mestranol and norethynodrel[4].

Dose Adjustments and Formulations

The initial doses of Enovid were 9.85 mg norethynodrel and 150 μg mestranol per pill. However, due to concerns over side effects, particularly venous thromboembolism, the doses were reduced over time. By the 1960s, formulations with lower doses such as 100 μg mestranol and 2 mg norethisterone (Ortho-Novum) became common[4].

Financial Performance

Initial Success

The introduction of Enovid was a financial success for G. D. Searle & Company. The drug quickly gained popularity due to its effectiveness in preventing pregnancy and regulating menstrual cycles. By the early 1960s, Enovid had become a leading product in the contraceptive market.

Market Growth and Competition

As the use of combined hormonal contraceptives expanded globally, the market grew significantly. By the 1990s, the global market for hormonal contraceptives had seen substantial growth, with a 19% increase between 1994 and 1999 and a further 21% increase from 1999 to 2004[4].

Shifts in Market Trends

Over the years, there has been a shift towards lower-dose formulations and the use of newer progestogens like desogestrel and gestodene. These changes were driven by the need to reduce side effects such as androgenic symptoms and cardiovascular risks. Despite these shifts, monophasic formulations containing mestranol and norethynodrel continued to be used, albeit at lower doses[4].

Challenges and Controversies

Safety Concerns

One of the significant challenges faced by Enovid and similar drugs was the increased risk of venous thromboembolism, stroke, and myocardial infarction, particularly in smokers or those with high blood pressure. These risks were highlighted in the late 1960s and early 1970s, leading to a reevaluation of the drug's safety profile[5].

Regulatory and Legal Issues

The use of Enovid was also subject to legal and regulatory challenges. The drug was initially marketed for menstrual relief to circumvent laws prohibiting the prescription of contraceptives. It wasn't until the Eisenstadt v. Baird ruling in 1972 that it became legally prescribable as a contraceptive nationwide in the United States[5].

Current Market Status

Availability and Usage

Mestranol remains available only in a few countries, including the United States, the United Kingdom, Japan, and Chile, and is only marketed in combination with progestins like norethisterone. The use of combined hormonal contraceptives continues, although the market has diversified with newer formulations and progestogens[1].

Financial Trajectory

While the exact financial figures for mestranol and norethynodrel are not readily available, the overall market for hormonal contraceptives has continued to grow. The shift towards lower-dose formulations and newer progestogens has maintained a steady demand for these products. However, the market share of mestranol-based products has likely decreased as newer, safer alternatives have been developed.

Key Takeaways

  • Historical Significance: Mestranol and norethynodrel were pivotal in the development of the first combined oral contraceptive pill.
  • Market Expansion: The drugs saw rapid adoption globally, especially in the 1960s and 1970s.
  • Dose Adjustments: Concerns over safety led to the reduction of doses over time.
  • Financial Performance: The initial success was significant, but the market has evolved with newer formulations.
  • Challenges: Safety concerns and regulatory issues have impacted the drug's market trajectory.

FAQs

What was the first combined oral contraceptive pill?

The first combined oral contraceptive pill was Enovid, which contained mestranol and norethynodrel.

When was Enovid approved by the FDA?

Enovid was initially approved by the FDA on June 10, 1957, for menstrual disorders and later as a contraceptive on June 23, 1960.

Why were the doses of Enovid reduced over time?

The doses were reduced due to concerns over side effects, particularly venous thromboembolism.

Is mestranol still widely used today?

Mestranol is only available in a few countries and is primarily used in combination with progestins like norethisterone.

What were some of the safety concerns associated with Enovid?

Enovid was associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism, stroke, and myocardial infarction, especially in smokers or those with high blood pressure.

Sources

  1. Wikipedia: Mestranol
  2. PubMed: Effects of new low-dosage form of norethynodrel-mestranol
  3. DrugBank Online: Mestranol: Uses, Interactions, Mechanism of Action
  4. IARC Monographs: Combined Estrogen−Progestogen Contraceptives
  5. Wikipedia: Mestranol/norethynodrel

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.