You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

SODIUM TETRADECYL SULFATE - Generic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What are the generic drug sources for sodium tetradecyl sulfate and what is the scope of patent protection?

Sodium tetradecyl sulfate is the generic ingredient in two branded drugs marketed by Hikma, Elkins Sinn, and Mylan Institutional, and is included in three NDAs. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.

There are four drug master file entries for sodium tetradecyl sulfate. Three suppliers are listed for this compound.

Summary for SODIUM TETRADECYL SULFATE
US Patents:0
Tradenames:2
Applicants:3
NDAs:3
Drug Master File Entries: 4
Finished Product Suppliers / Packagers: 3
Raw Ingredient (Bulk) Api Vendors: 42
Clinical Trials: 10
Patent Applications: 3,475
What excipients (inactive ingredients) are in SODIUM TETRADECYL SULFATE?SODIUM TETRADECYL SULFATE excipients list
DailyMed Link:SODIUM TETRADECYL SULFATE at DailyMed
Recent Clinical Trials for SODIUM TETRADECYL SULFATE

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
University of California, Los AngelesNA
Goldman, Butterwick, Fitzpatrick and GroffPhase 2
Combined Military Hospital, PakistanEarly Phase 1

See all SODIUM TETRADECYL SULFATE clinical trials

Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) Categories for SODIUM TETRADECYL SULFATE
Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classes for SODIUM TETRADECYL SULFATE

US Patents and Regulatory Information for SODIUM TETRADECYL SULFATE

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Hikma SODIUM TETRADECYL SULFATE sodium tetradecyl sulfate INJECTABLE;INJECTION 209937-001 Dec 9, 2019 AP RX No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Elkins Sinn SOTRADECOL sodium tetradecyl sulfate INJECTABLE;INJECTION 005970-005 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Mylan Institutional SOTRADECOL sodium tetradecyl sulfate INJECTABLE;INJECTION 040541-002 Nov 12, 2004 AP RX No Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Elkins Sinn SOTRADECOL sodium tetradecyl sulfate INJECTABLE;INJECTION 005970-004 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Mylan Institutional SOTRADECOL sodium tetradecyl sulfate INJECTABLE;INJECTION 040541-001 Nov 12, 2004 RX No Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for Sodium Tetradecyl Sulfate

Last updated: August 1, 2025


Introduction

Sodium tetradecyl sulfate (STS) is a synthetic anionic surfactant extensively used in the medical field, primarily for sclerotherapy, where it serves as a sclerosant for the treatment of varicose veins and other vascular malformations. Its chemical properties and clinical efficacy have supported its widespread adoption, positioning it as a key player in minimally invasive vascular treatments. Analyzing the market dynamics and financial trajectory of STS offers insights into its growth potential, competitive landscape, regulatory challenges, and strategic opportunities for stakeholders.


Market Overview

The global market for sclerosing agents, including sodium tetradecyl sulfate, is experiencing steady growth driven by increasing prevalence of chronic venous diseases, aging populations, and rising awareness of minimally invasive treatment options. In 2022, the global sclerotherapy market was valued at approximately USD 250 million, with projections to reach USD 350 million by 2030, expanding at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of around 4.2%[1].

STS accounts for the majority share of this market owing to its safety profile, efficacy, and broad clinical indications. Major players manufacturing STS include:

  • Biocompatibles UK Ltd. (BTG International)
  • Pfizer Inc.
  • Dale Medical Products, Inc.
  • Sino Biopharmaceutical Limited
  • LGM Pharma

The competitive landscape is characterized by product innovations, strategic collaborations, and geographic expansion.


Market Drivers

1. Increasing Prevalence of Venous Diseases

Chronic venous insufficiency (CVI), varicose veins, and telangiectasias are pervasive, particularly among aging populations. According to the American Venous Forum, over 30 million adults in the U.S. suffer from varicose veins, fueling demand for minimally invasive treatments like sclerotherapy with STS.

2. Rising Adoption of Minimally Invasive Procedures

Patients and clinicians prefer less invasive alternatives to traditional surgery, leading to increased use of sclerosing agents. STS's proven safety, efficacy, and relative affordability have contributed to its preference.

3. Expanding Geographic Footprint

Emerging markets in Asia-Pacific and Latin America present substantial growth opportunities due to expanding healthcare infrastructure, improving awareness, and increasing disposable incomes. The World Health Organization reports significant growth in vascular treatment procedures in these regions.

4. Technological and Formulation Advancements

Product improvements, such as optimized concentrations, combined therapy approaches, and better delivery systems, enhance therapeutic outcomes and expand the clinical indications of STS.


Market Challenges & Restraints

1. Regulatory and Safety Concerns

Although generally considered safe, STS is associated with adverse effects like thrombophlebitis, hyperpigmentation, and rare allergic reactions. Regulatory agencies (FDA, EMA) impose strict guidelines, and product approvals involve rigorous clinical data review, potentially delaying market entry or expansion.

2. Competition from Alternative Sclerosants

Other agents such as polidocanol, foam sclerosants, and laser therapy are increasingly competing with STS, often offering comparable efficacy with differing safety profiles or ease of use.

3. Patent Cliff and Generic Competition

Given the patent expirations for several formulations, generic manufacturers can produce STS at lower costs, intensifying price competition and squeezing profit margins.

4. Limited Awareness in Emerging Markets

Despite growth potential, limited physician awareness and infrastructure deficits hamper rapid adoption in certain regions.


Financial Trajectory and Investment Trends

1. Revenue Generation and Profitability

Leading manufacturers report steady revenue streams from STS products, driven by core markets in North America and Europe. For example, Biocompatibles UK Ltd. reported revenues exceeding USD 200 million in vascular products in 2021, with a significant portion attributable to STS formulations[2]. Gross margins in this segment tend to range from 60-70%, reflecting economies of scale and high demand.

2. R&D and Innovation Investment

Major players are investing heavily in R&D to develop new formulations, such as foam-based sclerosants, and novel delivery systems. Investment in clinical trials enhances product positioning and supports regulatory submissions in new markets.

3. Market Expansion and Licensing

Strategic licensing agreements and collaborations with regional distributors facilitate market penetration. For instance, Pfizer’s partnerships in emerging markets contribute to increased sales and market share.

4. Regulatory Landscape Impact

Regulatory hurdles, including the need for post-market surveillance and compliance, influence financial projections. Companies that effectively navigate this landscape can secure competitive advantages and sustain profitability.

5. Mergers and Acquisitions

Recent M&A activity aims to consolidate market position. For example, acquisitions of smaller biotech firms with innovative sclerosant technologies can diversify portfolios and open new revenue streams.


Future Market Outlook

The future trajectory of STS hinges on several key factors:

  • Clinical Evidence & Guidelines: Enhanced clinical data supporting safety and efficacy will bolster clinician confidence and adoption.
  • Regulatory Approvals: Expanding approvals, especially in Asian and Latin American markets, will bolster sales.
  • Product Innovation: Foam formulations, combination therapies, and biodegradable carriers are strategic focus areas.
  • Healthcare Policy & Economic Factors: Reimbursement policies and healthcare spending will influence access and utilization.

Projections suggest a steady CAGR of roughly 4-5%, with opportunities in cosmeceutical applications and treatment of vascular malformations, which could diversify revenue streams beyond traditional varicose vein treatments.


Conclusion

Sodium tetradecyl sulfate remains a cornerstone of sclerotherapy, supported by consistent clinical demand driven by rising vascular disease prevalence and preferences for minimally invasive interventions. While challenges persist—regulatory complexities, competition, and market saturation—product innovation and geographic expansion are set to drive its financial trajectory. Stakeholders investing in or developing STS formulations must emphasize clinical validation, regulatory strategy, and regional market nuances to sustain growth.


Key Takeaways

  • The global sclerotherapy market, predominantly led by sodium tetradecyl sulfate, is projected to grow at a CAGR of 4.2% through 2030, buoyed by aging populations and minimally invasive procedure preferences.
  • Major revenue drivers include expanding indications, geographic expansion into emerging markets, and product innovation, especially foam formulations.
  • Regulatory and safety considerations, alongside increasing competition from alternative agents, remain key market challenges.
  • Strategic collaborations, patent expirations, and investments in clinical research will shape the financial outlook and competitive landscape.
  • For sustained growth, stakeholders should focus on innovation, regulatory compliance, and education to optimize adoption and market penetration.

FAQs

1. What makes sodium tetradecyl sulfate a preferred sclerosant in vein treatments?
Its proven efficacy, safety profile, low allergenic potential, and ease of injection make it favored over other agents for treating varicose veins and vascular malformations.

2. How do patent expiries impact the market for sodium tetradecyl sulfate?
Patent expiries facilitate the entry of generic manufacturers, increasing competition, reducing prices, and pressuring established firms' profit margins.

3. What are the primary regulatory considerations for sodium tetradecyl sulfate?
Regulators require comprehensive clinical data on safety and efficacy, with specific regional approval processes influencing market access timelines and formulations.

4. How is innovation influencing the financial trajectory of STS?
Advancements such as foam sclerosants and combination therapies improve treatment outcomes, expanding indications and generating new revenue streams.

5. What opportunities exist for expanding the use of sodium tetradecyl sulfate?
Potential expansions include treatment of vascular malformations beyond varicose veins, use in cosmetic dermatology, and application in developing markets with growing healthcare infrastructure.


References

[1] MarketWatch. (2022). Sclerotherapy Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report.
[2] Biocompatibles UK Ltd. Annual Financial Reports, 2021.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.