You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 28, 2024

Code - Generic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patents and Regulatory Information for code

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Cenci TRIPROLIDINE AND PSEUDOEPHEDRINE HYDROCHLORIDES W/ CODEINE codeine phosphate; pseudoephedrine hydrochloride; triprolidine hydrochloride SYRUP;ORAL 089018-001 Jul 23, 1986 DISCN No No ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe
Hikma PROMETHAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE, PHENYLEPHRINE HYDROCHLORIDE W/CODEINE PHOSPHATE codeine phosphate; phenylephrine hydrochloride; promethazine hydrochloride SYRUP;ORAL 040674-001 Dec 23, 2014 DISCN No No ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe
Halsey PHERAZINE W/ CODEINE codeine phosphate; promethazine hydrochloride SYRUP;ORAL 088739-001 Dec 23, 1988 DISCN No No ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe
Cenci PROMETHAZINE VC W/ CODEINE codeine phosphate; phenylephrine hydrochloride; promethazine hydrochloride SYRUP;ORAL 088816-001 Nov 22, 1985 DISCN No No ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe
Tris Pharma Inc PROMETHAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND CODEINE PHOSPHATE codeine phosphate; promethazine hydrochloride SYRUP;ORAL 200386-001 Jun 29, 2012 AA RX No Yes ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe
Nostrum Labs Inc PROMETHAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND CODEINE PHOSPHATE codeine phosphate; promethazine hydrochloride SYRUP;ORAL 090180-001 Mar 17, 2010 AA RX No No ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Code Market Analysis and Financial Projection Experimental

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory in the Pharmaceutical Sector: A Comprehensive Analysis

Introduction

The pharmaceutical industry, particularly in the realm of hematology-oncology, is undergoing significant transformations driven by the introduction of new therapeutic drugs, changes in regulatory policies, and shifting market dynamics. This article delves into the key aspects of these changes, focusing on market adoption, financial implications, and the impact of recent legislative actions.

Market Adoption in Hematology-Oncology

New Therapeutic Entries

The entry of new drugs into the hematology-oncology market has significantly altered the treatment landscape. Drugs such as BRUKINSA®, IMBRUVICA®, VENCLEXTA®, ICLUSIG®, and CALQUENCE® have been tracked for their market impact. Notably, BRUKINSA®, approved for chronic lymphocytic leukemia in January 2023, saw a 149% growth in usage from 2022 to 2023, while IMBRUVICA® patient counts decreased by 51% from their peak in 2019[1].

Market Share Shifts

By 2023, VENCLEXTA® emerged as the leading therapeutic among these five drugs, capturing 42% of the market basket share. This shift highlights the competitive nature of the market and potential changes in clinical preferences. The rapid ascent of BRUKINSA® and the decline of IMBRUVICA® underscore the dynamic and evolving nature of the hematology-oncology drug market[1].

Financial Implications for Patients and Payers

Out-of-Pocket Costs Under Medicare Part D

The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) of 2022 has introduced significant changes to Medicare Part D, aiming to reduce the financial burden on patients. Prior to the IRA, patients faced high out-of-pocket costs, especially for specialty drugs, due to high cost-sharing requirements until reaching the catastrophic spending threshold. The IRA introduces a $2,000 annual cap on out-of-pocket costs and allows for the smoothing of these costs over 12 months, making monthly payments more manageable for patients[2].

Impact on Patient Adherence

The smoothing provision under the IRA is expected to reduce prescription abandonment and treatment interruptions. By spreading out the $2,000 annual cap over 12 months, patients are less likely to face prohibitive costs early in the year, ensuring better adherence to their treatment plans[2].

Demographic Variations in Treatment Access

Payer and Demographic Analysis

Medicare remains the dominant payer for most prescriptions in the hematology-oncology sector. Demographically, non-Hispanic Whites make up the largest percentage of the treated population (76%), significantly higher than their representation in the U.S. population. Additionally, treated patients are more likely to be male (61%)[1].

Equity in Healthcare Access

These demographic findings highlight existing disparities in healthcare access. The data aligns with literature showing higher incidence rates of blood cancers among White patients and males. Addressing these disparities is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies and ensuring equitable access to healthcare[1].

Generic Drug Market Dynamics

Competition and Price Reductions

The generic drug market is characterized by intense competition, which drives down prices. Research indicates that generic drug prices fall as the number of competitors increases, approaching long-run marginal costs when there are eight or more competitors. Initially, generic monopolists charge prices 35-50% above long-run marginal costs, but these prices decline as more firms enter the market[3].

Entry and Revenue Dynamics

More firms enter markets with greater expected rents, and the size and time paths of generic revenues and profits are significantly affected by measures reflecting the expected market size. This competition leads to a reduction in prices and an increase in the number of firms, ultimately benefiting consumers[3].

Legislative Impact on Drug Pricing

Inflation Reduction Act Provisions

The IRA introduces several provisions aimed at controlling drug prices. These include linking price increases to the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and implementing drug price negotiations for Medicare Part B drugs starting in 2028. These measures are expected to exert downward pressure on Medicare spending and reduce the financial burden on patients[5].

Impact on Medicare Spending

The IRA’s provisions, such as manufacturer discounts for the low-income population and the $2,000 cap on out-of-pocket spending, are expected to reduce Medicare prescription drug spending in the long term. However, initial upward pressure on spending is anticipated due to the restructuring of the Part D benefit[5].

List Price Changes and Their Implications

Annual Price Increases

List price changes for prescription drugs have been significant, with an average increase of 15.2% from January 2022 to January 2023. This translates to a substantial dollar value increase, particularly for more expensive drug products. The highest increases are often seen in January and July of each year[4].

Distribution of Price Increases

The distribution of list price increases shows that while the relative price change may not be significantly higher than in prior years, the dollar value increases are markedly higher for more expensive drugs. This trend indicates that even moderate percentage increases can result in substantial financial impacts on patients and payers[4].

Key Takeaways

  • Market Adoption: New drugs like BRUKINSA® are significantly altering the hematology-oncology market, with VENCLEXTA® emerging as a leading therapeutic.
  • Financial Implications: The IRA’s $2,000 annual cap and smoothing provision are crucial for reducing patient out-of-pocket costs and improving treatment adherence.
  • Demographic Variations: Non-Hispanic Whites and males are disproportionately represented in the treated population, highlighting the need for equitable access to healthcare.
  • Generic Market Dynamics: Increased competition in the generic drug market leads to lower prices and greater consumer benefits.
  • Legislative Impact: The IRA’s provisions on drug pricing and negotiations are expected to reduce Medicare spending and patient financial burdens.

FAQs

Q: How has the introduction of new drugs impacted the hematology-oncology market?

A: The introduction of new drugs like BRUKINSA® and VENCLEXTA® has led to significant shifts in market share, with VENCLEXTA® becoming the leading therapeutic and BRUKINSA® showing rapid growth.

Q: What changes has the Inflation Reduction Act introduced to Medicare Part D?

A: The IRA has introduced a $2,000 annual cap on out-of-pocket costs and a smoothing provision to spread these costs over 12 months, making monthly payments more manageable for patients.

Q: How does competition affect generic drug prices?

A: Increased competition in the generic drug market leads to lower prices, with prices approaching long-run marginal costs when there are eight or more competitors.

Q: What are the expected long-term impacts of the IRA on Medicare spending?

A: The IRA’s provisions are expected to exert downward pressure on Medicare spending through measures such as linking price increases to CPI and implementing drug price negotiations.

Q: How do list price changes affect patients and payers?

A: List price increases, particularly for more expensive drugs, result in substantial financial impacts on patients and payers, highlighting the need for price control measures.

Sources

  1. Komodo Health: "Drug Snapshot: Shifting Paradigms in Hematology-Oncology"
  2. Penn LDI: "Part D Costs Under The Inflation Reduction Act"
  3. Federal Trade Commission: "Generic Drug Industry Dynamics"
  4. ASPE: "Changes in the List Prices of Prescription Drugs, 2017-2023"
  5. CMS: "NHE Fact Sheet"

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.