| 2015-09-21 |
10 |
|
THE PATENTS-IN-SUIT
26. United States Patent No. 6,774,122 (the “’122 Patent”), entitled… the expiration of
AstraZeneca’s U.S. Patent Nos. 6,774,122, 7,456,160, 8,329,680, and 8,466,139.
… COUNT I: INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,774,122
40. Plaintiffs hereby reallege… U.S. PATENT NO. 6,774,122
51. Plaintiffs hereby reallege… This is a civil action for patent infringement under the patent laws of the United
States, Title |
External link to document |
| 2016-09-02 |
120 |
|
Formulations, 52 J. Pharm. Sci. Tech. • U.S. Patent No. 6,417,191, AZF2_00005454–66
…Statement for U.S. Patent Nos. 6,774,122
(“the ’122 Patent”), 7,456,160 (“the ’160 Patent”), 8,329,680 (… (“the ’680 Patent”), and 8,466,139
(“the ’139 Patent”) (collectively, “the Patents-in-Suit”) in the…disputed term in the ’122 Patent (Exhibit A), the ’160 Patent (Exhibit B), the ’680 Patent
(Exhibit C), and…these Hatch-Waxman patent actions, Plaintiffs are asserting infringement of the
Patents-in-Suit against |
External link to document |
| 2017-01-04 |
197 |
|
enjoined from
infringing United States Patent Numbers 6,774,122, 7,456,160, 8,329,680 and 8,466,139, on…2015
27 October 2017
1:15-cv-06039
830 Patent
None
District Court, D. New Jersey |
External link to document |
| 2015-12-07 |
29 |
|
the expiration of the
Plaintiff’s U.S. Patent Nos. 6,774,122, 7,456,160, 8,329,680,
and 8,466,139.
…law
and fact in so much as they are actions for patent infringement
Case 1:15-cv-06039-RMB-KMW Document…2015
27 October 2017
1:15-cv-06039
830 Patent
None
District Court, D. New Jersey |
External link to document |
