You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 9, 2025

Litigation Details for AltaThera Pharmaceuticals LLC v. Hyloris Pharmaceuticals SA (N.D. Ill. 2022)


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Small Molecule Drugs cited in AltaThera Pharmaceuticals LLC v. Hyloris Pharmaceuticals SA
The small molecule drug covered by the patent cited in this case is ⤷  Try for Free .

Details for AltaThera Pharmaceuticals LLC v. Hyloris Pharmaceuticals SA (N.D. Ill. 2022)

Date FiledDocument No.DescriptionSnippetLink To Document
2022-08-30 External link to document
2022-08-30 1 Complaint published when the patent issued on December 24, 2019 as U.S. Patent No. 10,512,620. …use until December 24, 2019, when U.S. Patent No. 10,512,620 issued and was published. …December 24, 2019 when it issued as U.S. Patent No. 10,512,620. 148. Each of the first draft… earliest, December 24, 2019, when U.S. Patent No. 10,512,620 issued and was published. 166. …December 24, 2019 when it issued as U.S. Patent No. 10,512,620. 168. Each of the first draft External link to document
>Date Filed>Document No.>Description>Snippet>Link To Document
Showing 1 to 2 of 2 entries

AltaThera Pharmaceuticals LLC v. Hyloris Pharmaceuticals SA: A Comprehensive Litigation Summary and Analysis

Introduction

In August 2022, AltaThera Pharmaceuticals LLC filed a significant lawsuit against Hyloris Pharmaceuticals SA, Academic Pharmaceuticals Inc., and Dr. John C. Somberg, alleging multiple serious violations including misappropriation of trade secrets, breach of contract, and civil conspiracy. This case highlights the critical importance of protecting intellectual property in the pharmaceutical industry.

Background of AltaThera Pharmaceuticals

AltaThera Pharmaceuticals is a hospital-focused pharmaceutical company dedicated to addressing unmet medical needs through innovative drug repurposing and treatment administration methods. One of its key innovations is a method for administering Sotalol IV, which reduces a patient's hospital stay from three days to one day. AltaThera invested millions of dollars and several years in developing this method and obtaining FDA approval, keeping the process confidential as a trade secret[1].

The Allegations

The complaint filed by AltaThera alleges that Dr. John C. Somberg, a long-time consultant, and his companies, Academic Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Hyloris Pharmaceuticals SA, misappropriated AltaThera's confidential information and trade secrets. Despite entering into agreements to maintain confidentiality and not use the information for their own business purposes, the defendants allegedly used this information to develop a competing drug called Dofetilide IV[1].

Misappropriation of Trade Secrets

AltaThera claims that Dr. Somberg and his companies had access to highly confidential patent applications and regulatory information. The complaint states that Dr. Somberg copied verbatim significant portions of a patent application he helped prepare for AltaThera, which is a clear violation of the confidentiality agreements. This misappropriation allowed the defendants to pursue and obtain patent protection and FDA approval for Dofetilide IV, a direct competitor to AltaThera's Sotalol IV[1].

Legal Claims

The lawsuit filed by AltaThera includes several legal claims:

  • Misappropriation of Trade Secrets: Under the Defend Trade Secrets Act and the Illinois Trade Secret Act.
  • Breach of Contract: For violating the confidentiality agreements.
  • Civil Conspiracy: For the alleged collaborative effort to misappropriate trade secrets.
  • Tortious Interference: For interfering with AltaThera's business relationships.
  • Unjust Enrichment: For the financial benefits gained by the defendants through the misappropriation.
  • Fraudulent Concealment: For hiding the misuse of AltaThera's confidential information.
  • Breach of Fiduciary Duty: For Dr. Somberg's failure to act in AltaThera's best interests[1].

Relief Sought

AltaThera seeks various forms of relief, including:

  • Compensatory and Consequential Damages
  • Disgorgement of Profits: From the sales of Dofetilide IV.
  • Correction of Inventorship: For the defendants' patent application for Dofetilide IV.
  • Declaration of Ownership: Declaring AltaThera's rights to the Sotalol IV method and any related patents.
  • Attorney’s Fees and Costs[1].

Representation and Jurisdiction

AltaThera is represented by Sidley Austin LLP, and the case is being heard in the Northern District of Illinois[1].

Industry Implications

This case underscores the importance of robust confidentiality agreements and the severe consequences of their breach. It also highlights the challenges pharmaceutical companies face in protecting their intellectual property, especially when working with consultants and partners.

Expert Insights

Philip L. Hirschhorn, a partner at Panitch Schwarze and an experienced trial lawyer in intellectual property and trade secret cases, has handled similar disputes. His experience in cases like Orthobond Corporation v. Burel et al. and Metrologic Instruments, Inc. v. Symbol Technologies demonstrates the complexity and importance of trade secret litigation in the industry[2].

Statistical and Market Context

The pharmaceutical industry is highly competitive, with companies investing billions in research and development. Protecting trade secrets is crucial for maintaining a competitive edge. For instance, Hyloris Pharmaceuticals SA has several drugs in various stages of development, including small molecule drugs and chemical drugs, which could be impacted by the outcome of this litigation[3].

Key Takeaways

  • Protection of Trade Secrets: Confidentiality agreements are essential, but their enforcement is equally critical.
  • Legal Consequences: Misappropriation of trade secrets can lead to severe legal and financial repercussions.
  • Industry Impact: The case highlights the importance of intellectual property protection in the pharmaceutical industry.
  • Consultant Relationships: Working with consultants requires stringent confidentiality measures to prevent breaches.

FAQs

Q: What is the main allegation in the AltaThera Pharmaceuticals LLC v. Hyloris Pharmaceuticals SA case? A: The main allegation is that Hyloris Pharmaceuticals SA and its affiliates misappropriated AltaThera's trade secrets related to the administration of Sotalol IV.

Q: What legal claims are included in the lawsuit? A: The lawsuit includes claims for misappropriation of trade secrets, breach of contract, civil conspiracy, tortious interference, unjust enrichment, fraudulent concealment, and breach of fiduciary duty.

Q: What relief is AltaThera seeking in the lawsuit? A: AltaThera is seeking compensatory and consequential damages, disgorgement of profits, correction of inventorship, a declaration of ownership, and attorney’s fees and costs.

Q: Who is representing AltaThera in this case? A: AltaThera is represented by Sidley Austin LLP.

Q: What are the potential implications of this case for the pharmaceutical industry? A: The case emphasizes the critical need for robust confidentiality agreements and the severe consequences of their breach, highlighting the importance of protecting intellectual property in the pharmaceutical industry.

Cited Sources

  1. Law Street Media: "AltaThera Pharmaceuticals Sues Competitor for Misappropriation of Trade Secrets"
  2. Panitch Schwarze: "Philip L. Hirschhorn - Partner"
  3. Synapse by Patsnap: "Hyloris Pharmaceuticals SA - Drug pipelines, Patents, Clinical trials"
  4. Life Sciences IP Review: "AltaThera hits competitor with trade secret suit"
  5. Justia Dockets: "AltaThera Pharmaceuticals LLC v. Hyloris Pharmaceuticals SA et al"

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.