You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 1, 2025

Litigation Details for BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. ANOBRI PHARMACEUTICALS US, LLC (D.N.J. 2023)


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. ANOBRI PHARMACEUTICALS US, LLC (D.N.J. 2023)

Docket ⤷  Try for Free Date Filed 2023-06-29
Court District Court, D. New Jersey Date Terminated
Cause 35:271 Patent Infringement Assigned To Claire Claudia Cecchi
Jury Demand None Referred To Leda Dunn Wettre
Parties NANCHANG ANOVENT PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.
Patents 7,284,474; 7,396,341; 7,837,235; 7,896,264; 8,733,341; 9,027,967
Attorneys SARAH ANN SULLIVAN
Firms Saul Ewing LLP
Link to Docket External link to docket
Small Molecule Drugs cited in BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. ANOBRI PHARMACEUTICALS US, LLC
The small molecule drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷  Try for Free , ⤷  Try for Free , ⤷  Try for Free , and ⤷  Try for Free .

Details for BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. ANOBRI PHARMACEUTICALS US, LLC (D.N.J. 2023)

Date FiledDocument No.DescriptionSnippetLink To Document
2023-06-29 External link to document
2023-06-29 77 Stipulation and Order and Affirmative Defenses regarding U.S. Patent Nos. 7,284,474 and 7,896,264. All claims, counterclaims…collectively, "Boehringer") relating to the '474 and '264 patents are dismissed as moot, without prejudice. Signed… 29 June 2023 2:23-cv-03530 835 Patent - Abbreviated New Drug Application(ANDA) None External link to document
>Date Filed>Document No.>Description>Snippet>Link To Document
Showing 1 to 2 of 2 entries

Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Anobri Pharmaceuticals US, LLC: A Comprehensive Litigation Summary and Analysis

Introduction

The litigation between Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Anobri Pharmaceuticals US, LLC is a significant case in the pharmaceutical industry, revolving around patent infringement related to Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs). Here, we will delve into the details of the case, its key components, and the implications for both parties involved.

Case Overview

The case, filed on June 29, 2023, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, is identified as 2:23-cv-03530. The plaintiffs, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, have accused the defendants, Anobri Pharmaceuticals US, LLC, NanChang Anovent Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Shanghai Anovent Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., of patent infringement[2][5].

Nature of the Suit

The nature of the suit is categorized as "Patent - Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA)," which involves the defendants' filing of ANDAs for generic versions of drugs that allegedly infringe on Boehringer Ingelheim's patents. The cause of action is based on 35 U.S.C. § 271, which pertains to patent infringement[2][5].

Parties Involved

  • Plaintiffs: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH.
  • Defendants: Anobri Pharmaceuticals US, LLC, NanChang Anovent Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Shanghai Anovent Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.[2][5].

Court and Jurisdiction

The case is being heard in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, with Judge Claire C. Cecchi presiding. The jurisdiction is based on federal patent laws, and the court has the authority to hear cases involving patent infringement[2][5].

Key Filings and Actions

  • Complaint: The initial complaint was filed on June 29, 2023, alleging patent infringement by the defendants.
  • Counterclaim: Anobri Pharmaceuticals US, LLC filed an amended answer to the complaint and a counterclaim against Boehringer Ingelheim on October 16, 2023[5].
  • Dismissal of Defendants: A stipulation and order were signed by Judge Claire C. Cecchi on October 16, 2023, dismissing NanChang Anovent Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Anovent Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. without prejudice and amending the caption to reflect the same[5].

Termination of the Case

The case was terminated on December 18, 2023, although the specific reasons for the termination are not detailed in the available sources[5].

Implications and Analysis

Patent Infringement Claims

Boehringer Ingelheim's claims are centered on the assertion that Anobri Pharmaceuticals' ANDA filings infringe on their existing patents. This is a common strategy in the pharmaceutical industry to protect intellectual property and maintain market exclusivity.

Regulatory Context

The case is set against the backdrop of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA), which governs the approval process for biosimilar drugs. Recent legislative developments, such as the Affordable Prescriptions for Patients Act of 2023, aim to limit the number of patents that innovators can assert against biosimilar applicants, potentially impacting future litigation in this area[3].

Competitive Landscape

The litigation highlights the competitive tensions between innovator pharmaceutical companies and generic or biosimilar manufacturers. Boehringer Ingelheim's actions are likely aimed at protecting their market share and revenue streams from their patented drugs.

Legal Precedents

The outcome of this case could set precedents for future ANDA-related patent infringement cases. The court's decisions on the validity of the patents and the infringement claims will be closely watched by industry stakeholders.

Conclusion

The litigation between Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Anobri Pharmaceuticals US, LLC is a significant example of the complex legal battles that often ensue in the pharmaceutical industry over patent rights and market competition. The case's termination does not diminish its importance, as it reflects the ongoing struggles between innovators and generic manufacturers in the context of ANDA filings and patent infringement claims.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Infringement Claims: Boehringer Ingelheim alleged that Anobri Pharmaceuticals' ANDA filings infringed on their patents.
  • Regulatory Context: The case is influenced by BPCIA and potential changes from the Affordable Prescriptions for Patients Act of 2023.
  • Competitive Landscape: The litigation reflects the competitive tensions between innovator and generic/biosimilar manufacturers.
  • Legal Precedents: The case's outcome could set important precedents for future ANDA-related patent infringement cases.
  • Termination: The case was terminated on December 18, 2023, but its implications remain relevant.

FAQs

What is the nature of the suit in Boehringer Ingelheim v. Anobri Pharmaceuticals?

The nature of the suit is "Patent - Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA)," involving allegations of patent infringement.

Which court is presiding over the case?

The U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey is presiding over the case, with Judge Claire C. Cecchi.

What is the significance of the Affordable Prescriptions for Patients Act of 2023 in this context?

The Act aims to limit the number of patents that innovators can assert against biosimilar applicants, which could impact future patent infringement litigation.

Why did Boehringer Ingelheim file this lawsuit?

Boehringer Ingelheim filed the lawsuit to protect their patents and maintain market exclusivity against generic or biosimilar versions of their drugs.

What was the outcome of the case?

The case was terminated on December 18, 2023, although the specific reasons for the termination are not detailed in the available sources.

Sources

  1. Justia Dockets: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al v. Anobri Pharmaceuticals US, LLC et al[1].
  2. Law360: BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al v. ANOBRI PHARMACEUTICALS US, LLC et al[2].
  3. Sidley: U.S. Senate Passes Affordable Prescriptions for Patients Act of 2023[3].
  4. ClassAction.org: 1199SEIU National Benefit Fund et al. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al[4].
  5. PacerMonitor: BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al v. ANOBRI PHARMACEUTICALS US, LLC et al[5].

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.