Litigation Details for CITY OF PROVIDENCE v. CELGENE CORPORATION (D.N.J. 2015)
✉ Email this page to a colleague
CITY OF PROVIDENCE v. CELGENE CORPORATION (D.N.J. 2015)
Docket | ⤷ Sign Up | Date Filed | 2015-03-03 |
Court | District Court, D. New Jersey | Date Terminated | 2015-03-31 |
Cause | 15:25 Clayton Act | Assigned To | Madeline Cox Arleo |
Jury Demand | Plaintiff | Referred To | Leda Dunn Wettre |
Patents | 6,045,501; 6,281,230; 6,315,720; 6,555,554; 6,561,976; 6,561,977; 6,755,784; 7,119,106; 7,465,800; 8,288,415; 8,315,886; 8,404,717 | ||
Link to Docket | External link to docket |
Small Molecule Drugs cited in CITY OF PROVIDENCE v. CELGENE CORPORATION
Details for CITY OF PROVIDENCE v. CELGENE CORPORATION (D.N.J. 2015)
Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
---|---|---|---|---|
2015-03-03 | 1 | . Celgene’s patents on the procedures for safe distribution include the 6,045,501 patent, the 6,315,720… Obtained 6,045,501 ‘501 patent Methods for delivering a 8/28/1998 …,720 patent, the 6,561,976 patent, the 6,561,977 patent and the 6,755,784 patent (the “Distribution Method…information describing the patent as a “drug product patent” only if the patent claimed the specific drug… Method Patents”), and the 8,315,886 patent. Specifically, these patents claim the following subject | External link to document | |
>Date Filed | >Document No. | >Description | >Snippet | >Link To Document |