Litigation Details for Cutting Edge Vision, LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. (W.D. Tex. 2024)

Cutting Edge Vision, LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. (W.D. Tex. 2024)

Docket		Date Filed	2024-05-20
Court	District Court, W.D. Texas	Date Terminated
Cause	28:1331 Fed. Question	Assigned To	Alia Moses
Jury Demand	Both	Referred To	Derek T. Gilliland
Patents	10,092,008; 10,099,009; 10,099,019; 10,155,002; 4,092,025; 5,638,300; 6,121,021; 9,108,002
Link to Docket	External link to docket

Biologic Drugs cited in Cutting Edge Vision, LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc.

Details for Cutting Edge Vision, LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. (W.D. Tex. 2024)

Date Filed	Document No.	Description	Snippet	Link To Document
2024-05-20				External link to document

Litigation summary and analysis for: Cutting Edge Vision, LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. (W.D. Tex. 2024)

Based on the available information, here is a summary and analysis of the Cutting Edge Vision, LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. litigation (Case No. 6:24-cv-00270):

Key Details:

• Filed on May 20, 2024 in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas
• Plaintiff: Cutting Edge Vision, LLC
• Defendants: T-Mobile US, Inc. and at least one other unnamed defendant
• Nature of Suit: Patent infringement (830 Property Rights - Patent)
• Judge: Alia Moses
• Referred to Magistrate Judge: Derek T. Gilliland

Summary: This appears to be a patent infringement lawsuit filed by Cutting Edge Vision against T-Mobile and at least one other defendant. The case was filed in the Western District of Texas, which is a popular venue for patent litigation.

While details are limited at this early stage, some key points and analysis:

1. Cutting Edge Vision seems to be a patent assertion entity, as they have filed multiple similar patent lawsuits against technology companies in recent years. Their previous cases have involved patents related to mobile device displays and imaging technology.

2. T-Mobile is likely being accused of infringing one or more patents owned by Cutting Edge Vision, potentially related to technology used in mobile devices or networks.

3. The Western District of Texas is known for having patent-friendly local rules and faster time to trial, which may be why the plaintiff chose this venue.

4. As a major wireless carrier, T-Mobile is frequently targeted in patent litigation. They will likely mount a vigorous defense, potentially challenging the validity of the asserted patents.

5. At this early stage, there are no substantive rulings or claim construction orders. The case will likely proceed through initial disclosures, claim construction, and discovery over the coming months.

6. Given the technical nature of mobile telecommunications patents, expert witnesses will likely play a key role as the case develops.

7. Many patent cases settle before trial, so there is a possibility of early resolution if the parties can reach an agreement on licensing or other terms.

8. If the case proceeds, a trial would likely be at least 18-24 months away based on typical timelines in this district.

This case is in its very early stages, so many details about the specific patent claims and infringement allegations are not yet available. As the litigation progresses, more information will become public through court filings. The technology and patents at issue will become clearer once the complaint is available and claim construction begins.