Litigation Details for DEXCEL PHARMA TECHNOLOGIES LTD. v. SUN PHARMA GLOBAL FZE (D.N.J. 2015)
✉ Email this page to a colleague
DEXCEL PHARMA TECHNOLOGIES LTD. v. SUN PHARMA GLOBAL FZE (D.N.J. 2015)
| Docket | ⤷ Sign Up | Date Filed | 2015-11-11 |
| Court | District Court, D. New Jersey | Date Terminated | 2018-08-07 |
| Cause | 35:271 Patent Infringement | Assigned To | Susan Davis Wigenton |
| Jury Demand | None | Referred To | Leda Dunn Wettre |
| Parties | DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, INC. | ||
| Patents | 9,023,391 | ||
| Attorneys | NICHOLAS ANTHONY LOCASTRO | ||
| Firms | Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLC | ||
| Link to Docket | External link to docket | ||
Small Molecule Drugs cited in DEXCEL PHARMA TECHNOLOGIES LTD. v. SUN PHARMA GLOBAL FZE
The small molecule drug covered by the patent cited in this case is ⤷ Sign Up .
Details for DEXCEL PHARMA TECHNOLOGIES LTD. v. SUN PHARMA GLOBAL FZE (D.N.J. 2015)
| Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0000-00-00 | External link to document | |||
| 2015-11-10 | 1 | United States Patent Nos. 9,023,391 (“the ’391 patent”) and 7,255,878 (“the ’878 patent”) (collectively… 1. This is an action for patent infringement under the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C… The Patents-in-suit 9. On May 5, 2015, the United States Patent and Trademark …issued the ’391 patent, entitled “Stable Benzimidazole Formulation.” A copy of the ’391 patent is attached…issued the ’878 patent, entitled “Stable Benzimidazole Formulation.” A copy of the ’878 patent is attached | External link to document | |
| 2018-08-02 | 311 | Letter | Products”) infringe United States Patent No. 9,023,391 (“the ‘391 Patent”). …of the ’391 Patent; 2. Final judgment of noninfringement of the ‘391 patent is hereby entered…2015 7 August 2018 2:15-cv-08017 830 Patent None District Court, D. New Jersey | External link to document |
| 2017-03-13 | 88 | regarding patent claims in Plaintiffs’ U.S. Patent Nos. 7,255,878 (“the ’878 patent”) and 9,023,391 (“the…regarding the request for a patent claim construction pursuant to Local Patent Rule 4.5(a). …the ’391 patent”) (collectively, “the patents-in-suit”). After carefully considering the parties’ written…) infringement of the ’391 patent and (II) infringement of the ’878 patent. (Compl. 1 Markman …claim phrases: three in the ‘878 patent and two in the ‘391 patent. Defendants offer proposed constructions | External link to document | |
| >Date Filed | >Document No. | >Description | >Snippet | >Link To Document |
