0000-00-00 |
36 |
|
claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,465,504 (“the ’504 Patent”) and 6,596,750 (“the ’750
Patent”) are invalid…Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement of the ’504 Patent)
-2-…that Mylan is liable for infringement of the ’504
Patent. Novartis denies any and all remaining allegations…Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement of the ’750 Patent)
28. Novartis hereby incorporates the…that Mylan is liable for infringement of the ’750
Patent. Novartis denies any and all remaining allegations |
External link to document |
0000-00-00 |
38 |
|
3
Patent No. 6,465,504 (“the ‘504 Patent”), issued on October
15, 2002, and Patent No. 6,596,…that the patent has expired; (3) the date on which the
patent will expire; or, (4) that the patent is invalid…judgment that
Mylan infringed its patents; 2) a judgment that the patents are
valid and enforceable; 3) …four conditions regarding the patent status of the brand
drug: (1) that patent information for the brand …any infringement of Novartis’ patents, and countering that
the patents are invalid (Dkt. No. 31 at 17 |
External link to document |
0000-00-00 |
46 |
|
claims of Novartis’s U.S. Patent No. 6,465,504 (the
“’504 patent”) is invalid. Discovery will…and validity/invalidity of the patents-in-suit. The
patents-in-suit have already been litigated… more claims of Novartis’s U.S. Patent No. 6,596,750 (the “’750 Patent”) is
invalid. Discovery…infringes one or more claims of the ’504 patent or ’750 patent literally or under
the doctrine… 2015, Novartis shall produce the patents-in-suit and associated prosecution
|
External link to document |
0000-00-00 |
65 |
|
Number(s) 6,465,504; 6,596,750. (lih) (Entered: 03/22/2012)
03/21/2012 … Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Cause: 35:271 Patent Infringement … 4 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark
…informally, or
directly or indirectly, in any patent prosecution directed to any deferasirox drug product…party, in the preparation or prosecution of any patent application
directed to EXJADE® described in |
External link to document |
0000-00-00 |
66 |
|
infringe Plaintiffs’ patents—U.S. Patent No. 6,465,504 (the ’504
patent) and U.S. Patent No. 6,596,750 (the…’750 patent) (collectively, “the asserted patents”). In
addition to owning the asserted patents, Plaintiffs…642
II. BACKGROUND
This is a patent infringement case relating to Mylan Pharmaceuticals…caused by repeated blood transfusions.” The ’504
patent is generally directed to a compound or composition…composition including deferasirox, and the ’750
patent is generally directed to a method of treating certain |
External link to document |
0000-00-00 |
75 |
|
2
Patent No. 6,465,504 (“the ‘504 Patent”), issued on October
15, 2002, and Patent No. 6,596,…judgment that
Mylan infringed its patents; 2) a judgment that the patents are
valid and enforceable; 3) …any infringement of Novartis’ patents, and countering that
the patents are invalid (Dkt. No. 31 at 17…does not infringe
Novartis’ patents, a declaration that the patents are invalid,
dismissal of …“Novartis”), filed a complaint for patent
infringement against defendants |
External link to document |