You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: November 24, 2024

Litigation Details for Teva Pharmaceuticals International GmbH v. Eli Lilly and Company (D. Mass. 2018)


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Biologic Drugs cited in Teva Pharmaceuticals International GmbH v. Eli Lilly and Company
The biologic drug covered by the patent cited in this case is ⤷  Sign Up .

Details for Teva Pharmaceuticals International GmbH v. Eli Lilly and Company (D. Mass. 2018)

Date Filed Document No. Description Snippet Link To Document
0000-00-00 External link to document
2018-09-27 1 THE PATENTS-IN-SUIT A. U.S. Patent No. 8,586,045 46. On November…November 19, 2013, United States Patent No. 8,586,045 (“the ’045 patent”), …innovations are protected by at least U.S. Patent Nos. 8,586,045; 8,597,649; 9,266,951; 9,340,614; 9,346,8819,890,210; and 9,890,211 (“the Patents-in-Suit”). Labrys assigned the Patents-in-Suit to Teva on September…Infringes The Patents-in-Suit. 26. Eli Lilly tracks and follows Teva’s patents related to the External link to document
2021-02-24 101 Memorandum & Order nine patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 8,586,045 (“the ’045 patent”); 8,597,649 (“the ’649 patent”); 9,…9,266,951 (“the ’951 patent”); 9,340,614 (“the ’614 patent”); 9,346,881 (“the ’881 patent”); 9,884,9079,884,907 (“the ’907 patent”); 9,884,908 (“the ’908 patent”); 9,890,210 (“the ’210 patent”); and 9,890,211 …migraines, does not infringe Teva’s patents and that Teva’s patents are invalid. [ECF No. 17]. The parties…9,890,211 (“the ’211 patent”). [ECF No. 65 at 7, 8 n.3; ECF No. 66 at 6]. Six of the patents claim as inventive External link to document
2022-01-11 251 Memorandum & Order has infringed Teva’s patents, including U.S. Patent Nos. 8,586,045 (the “’045 Patent”); 9,884,907 (the …the “’907 Patent”); and 9,884,908 (the “’908 Patent”) (collectively, the “patents-in-suit”). [ECF No. 1…MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BURROUGHS, D.J. In this patent infringement suit, Teva Pharmaceuticals International… 1]. The patents-in- suit are related to a treatment for migraines that is marketed under the brand name…discussions of topics that “have no relation to the patents-in-suit or this litigation” are not evidence External link to document
2022-03-28 289 Summary Judgment to all asserted claims of the patents-in- suit (U.S. Patent No. 8,586,045, claims 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, …27, and 30; U.S. Patent No. 9,884,907, claims 1, 4, 5, 6, 15, and 17; and U.S. Patent No. 9,884,907, claims…, 5, 6, 15, and 17). The specification of the patents-in-suit does not, as a matter of law, enable a … 28 September 2023 1:18-cv-12029 830 Patent Both District Court, D. Massachusetts External link to document
>Date Filed >Document No. >Description >Snippet >Link To Document

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.