Litigation Details for Trutek Corp. v. BlueWillow Biologics, Inc. (E.D. Mich. 2021)
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Trutek Corp. v. BlueWillow Biologics, Inc. (E.D. Mich. 2021)
| Docket | ⤷ Sign Up | Date Filed | 2021-02-10 |
| Court | District Court, E.D. Michigan | Date Terminated | 2024-02-02 |
| Cause | 15:1126 Patent Infringement | Assigned To | F. Kay Behm |
| Jury Demand | Defendant | Referred To | R. Steven Whalen |
| Parties | ABC CORPORATION 1 THOUGH 10 | ||
| Patents | 10,138,279; 10,525,121; 6,375,986; 7,276,249; 7,314,624; 7,320,802 | ||
| Attorneys | Alan J. Gocha | ||
| Firms | Foley & Lardner LLP | ||
| Link to Docket | External link to docket | ||
Small Molecule Drugs cited in Trutek Corp. v. BlueWillow Biologics, Inc.
The small molecule drug covered by the patents cited in this case is ⤷ Sign Up .
Details for Trutek Corp. v. BlueWillow Biologics, Inc. (E.D. Mich. 2021)
| Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0000-00-00 | External link to document | |||
| 2021-06-25 | 12 | Response to Motion | 6,559,189; U.S. Patent No. 6,506,803; U.S. Patent No. 10,138,279; U.S. Published… 6,506,803; U.S. Patent No. 10,138,279; U.S. Published Application No. 2006/0163149; U.S. Published …one count of patent infringement of United States Patent No. 8,163,802 (“the ’802 Patent”) against BlueWillow…’802 Patent invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 102 and/or § 103: U.S. Patent No. 6,559,189; U.S. Patent No. 6,506,803…BlueWillow did not infringe Trutek’s patent; and (ii) Trutek’s patent is invalid. Trutek | External link to document |
| 2021-10-20 | 16 | Answer to Counterclaim | 6,559,189; U.S. Patent No. 6,506,803; U.S. Patent No. 10,138,279; U.S. 19 Published Application…infringement of 11 U.S. Patent No. 8,163,802 ("the '802 Patent") by BlueWillow, but …suit alleging one count of patent infringement 15 of the '802 Patent against BlueWillow. 16 … '802 Patent invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 102 and/or § 103; U.S. Patent No. 18 …Further, while Defendant cited four patents and 23 two patent application publications to support | External link to document |
| 2022-05-11 | 28 | Exhibit Proposed Amended Complaint | the Same." c. U.S. Patent No. 10,138,279 issued on November 27, 2018 to James R. …proper under the Patent Venue Statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b) since the tort of patent infringement occurred…1995, United States Patent No. 5,468,488 (hereinafter the '488 Patent) was issued to WAHI …x27;488 Patent was assigned to TRUTEK. 8. On October 7, 1997, United States Patent No. 5,674,481…2005, United States Patent No. 6,844,005 (hereinafter the '005 Patent) was issued to WAHI | External link to document |
| 2022-05-25 | 30 | Exhibit E - October 25, 2021 Email from S. Kremen to L. Peterson and Attached Oc | 206,996; and 10,525,121, all assigned to Nanobio. Further, I reviewed United States PatentNumbers 7,314,624… associated with the Nanobio patents. It is my belief that these patents as well as other publications…claims 1 and 2 of the.'802 Patent (owned by Tfutek) wifh the patents apd other publications describins…researched the patents'claims of both Trutek and Blue Willow and noting the patents and public armouncements…14312. At your request, I reviewed United States Patent No. 8,163,802 (hereinafter the '802 PatenJ | External link to document |
| 2022-09-26 | 39 | Exhibit 1 - Trutek's Interrogatory Answers | No. 6,506,803; U.S. Patent No. 10,138,279; U.S. Published Application No. 2006/0163149; U.S. Published…The term "Asserted Patent" or “Patent-in-Suit” shall mean U.S. Patent No. 8,163,802 (…802 Patent invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 102 and/or § 103: U.S. Patent No. 6,559,189; U.S. Patent …identifying each patent claim that You contend has been infringed by the asserted patent or will be … of the '802 Patent invalid. According to the law, the '802 Patent is presumed valid | External link to document |
| >Date Filed | >Document No. | >Description | >Snippet | >Link To Document |
