2019-08-02 |
155 |
Opinion - Memorandum Opinion |
infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 10,052,286 (the “’286 patent”),
10,064,878 (the “’878 patent”), 10,105,374 …986 patent (claims 1-22); °964 patent (claims 29-30); ’799 patent (claims 22-23).
15 °878 patent (claims…10,105,374 (the “’374 Patent”), 10,143,698 (the “’698 Patent”),
10,154,964 (the “964 Patent”), and 10,172,799 (… (the “’799 Patent”) (collectively “the patents-in-
suit”). (D.L 1) These patents may be grouped into …matrix . . .”) (quoting °286 patent at 5:15-19; °374 patent at
5:17-21; 964 patent at 5:15-19; D.L. 134, Mullen |
External link to document |
2019-10-28 |
161 |
SO ORDERED |
and
continue to infringe U.S. Patent Nos. 10,052,286, 10,064,878, 10,105,374, 10,143,698,
10,154,964…the
Patents-in-Suit, and have not induced and will not induce others to infringe the Patents-in-Suit…10,154,964, and l 0, 172,799 (collectively, the "Patents-in-Suit") by filing Actavis Laboratories
…declaratory judgment of noninfringement
of the Patents-in-Suit in Counts I, III, V, VII, IX, and XI of…for declaratory judgment of invalidity of the
Patents-in-Suit in Counts II, IV, VI, VIII, X, and XII |
External link to document |
2018-10-09 |
38 |
|
Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 10,052,286 B2 ;10,064,878 B2 . (Flynn…2018
28 October 2019
1:18-cv-01288
830 Patent
Plaintiff
District Court, D. Delaware |
External link to document |