Claims for Patent: 10,973,836
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Summary for Patent: 10,973,836
Title: | Methods of treating heart failure with reduced ejection fraction |
Abstract: | The present disclosure is directed to methods of treating patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), with and without Type 2 diabetes, with an SGLT2 inhibitor, such as dapagliflozin. The methods disclosed herein can reduce the risk of a composite outcome of a first episode of worsening heart failure (hospitalization for heart failure or an urgent heart failure visit) or death from cardiovascular causes. Each of the three components of this composite outcome can also be reduced, as well as the total number of heart failure hospitalizations and deaths from cardiovascular causes. SGLT2 inhibitors, such as dapagliflozin, can also reduce a worsening of heart failure symptoms. The methods disclosed herein can also improve heart failure symptoms, health status, and quality of life. |
Inventor(s): | Langkilde; Anna Maria (Sodertalje, SE) |
Assignee: | ASTRAZENECA AB (Sodertalje, SE) |
Application Number: | 16/812,745 |
Patent Claims: |
1. A method of reducing the rate of cardiovascular death and worsening heart failure in a patient with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), comprising
administering to the patient a pharmaceutical composition comprising a therapeutically effective amount of dapagliflozin; wherein the patient does not have type II diabetes; wherein the patient is also administered at least one standard of care HF
agent; and wherein the rate for cardiovascular death and worsening heart failure is reduced relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein worsening heart failure comprises unplanned hospitalization(s) for heart failure and/or urgent heart failure visit(s). 3. The method of claim 2, wherein unplanned hospitalization(s) for heart failure is due to one or more of the following: (a) new or worsening symptoms of HF experienced by the patient, and/or (b) objective evidence of new or worsening symptoms of HF; and/or (c) initiation of intensification of treatment specifically for HF. 4. The method of claim 3, wherein unplanned hospitalization(s) for heart failure includes first and/or recurrent hospitalizations for HF. 5. The method of claim 2, wherein urgent HF visit(s) includes one or more of the following: (a) an emergency room visit for a primary diagnosis of HF, not requiring hospitalization; (b) an emergency room visit for a primary diagnosis of HF, requiring treatment other than just an increase in oral diuretics, but not requiring hospitalization; (c) an urgent unscheduled visit to a physician's office for a primary diagnosis of HF; (d) an urgent unscheduled visit to a physician's office requiring treatment other than just an increase in oral diuretics; (e) initiation or intensification of treatment specifically for HF; and/or (f) initiation of intravenous therapy. 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the amount of dapagliflozin administered is 10 mg daily. 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the method further improves heart failure symptoms. 8. The method of claim 7, wherein the improvement in heart failure symptoms is measured by a patient's higher score on the KCCQ TSS compared to the patient's score prior to initiation of treatment with a pharmaceutical composition comprising a therapeutically effective amount of dapagliflozin. 9. The method of claim 8, wherein the higher score on the KCCQ TSS is at least 5 points higher than the score prior to administration with a pharmaceutical composition comprising a therapeutically effective amount of dapagliflozin. 10. The method of claim 8, wherein the higher score on the KCCQ TSS is at least 10 points higher than the score prior to administration with a pharmaceutical composition comprising a therapeutically effective amount of dapagliflozin. 11. The method of claim 8, wherein the higher score on the KCCQ TSS is at least 15 points higher than the score prior to administration with a pharmaceutical composition comprising a therapeutically effective amount of dapagliflozin. 12. The method off claim 7, wherein the improvement in heart failure symptoms is measured by a patient's lower deterioration in score on the KCCQ TSS relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone. 13. The method of claim 1, wherein the method satisfies at least one of the following conditions: a) the method results in a hazard ratio for time to first composite endpoint of hospitalization for HF, cardiovascular death or urgent HF visit that is less than one in a patient relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone; b) the method results in a hazard ratio for time to first composite endpoint of hospitalization for HF, cardiovascular death or urgent HF visit that is statistically nominally less than one in a patient relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard care HF agent alone; (c) the method results in a hazard ratio for time to first composite endpoint of hospitalization for HF, cardiovascular death or urgent HF visit at eighteen (18) months of approximately 0.73 in a patient relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone; (d) the method results in a 95% confidence interval for the hazard ratio for time to first composite endpoint of hospitalization for HF, cardiovascular death or urgent HF visit at eighteen (18) months of approximately 0.60 to 0.88 in a patient relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone; (e) the method numerically reduces that absolute risk of the composite endpoint of hospitalization for HF, cardiovascular death or urgent HF visit in a patient relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone; (f) the method results in a nominally significant risk reduction of the composite endpoint of hospitalization for HF, cardiovascular death or urgent HF visit in a patient relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone; (g) the method results in a numerical reduction in the composite endpoint events of hospitalization for HF, cardiovascular death or urgent HF visit in a patient relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone; (h) the method results in a numerical reduction in the rate of composite endpoint events of hospitalization for HF, cardiovascular death or urgent HF visit in a patient relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone; (i) the method results in a hazard ratio for time to cardiovascular death that is less than one in a patient relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone; j) the method results in a hazard ratio for time to cardiovascular death that is nominally significantly less than one in a patient relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone; k) the method results in a hazard ratio for time to cardiovascular death at eighteen (18) months of approximately 0.85 in a patient relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone; l) the method results in a 95% confidence interval for the hazard ratio for time to cardiovascular death at eighteen (18) months of approximately 0.66 to 1.10 in a patient relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone; m) the method results in a hazard ratio for time to first composite endpoint of hospitalization for HF or urgent HF visit that is less than one in a patient relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone; n) the method results in a hazard ratio for time to first composite endpoint of hospitalization for HF or urgent HF visit that is statistically nominally less than one in a patient relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone; o) the method results in a hazard ratio for time to first composite endpoint of hospitalization for HF or urgent HF visit at eighteen (18) months of approximately 0.62 in a patient relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone; p) the method results in a 95% confidence interval for the hazard ratio for time to first composite endpoint of hospitalization for HF or urgent HF visit at eighteen (18) months of approximately 0.48 to 0.80 in a patient relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone; q) the method results in a hazard ratio for time to first hospitalization for HF that is less than one in a patient relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone; r) the method results in a hazard ratio for time to first hospitalization for HF that is statistically nominally less than one in a patient relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone; s) the method results in a hazard ratio for time to first hospitalization for HF at eighteen (18) months of approximately 0.63 in a patient relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone; t) the method results in a 95% confidence interval for the hazard ratio for time to first hospitalization for HF at eighteen (18) months of approximately 0.48 to 0.81 in a patient relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone; u) the method results in a decrease in mean change of NT-proBNP levels in a patient within 8 months of the start of treatment, relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone; and/or v) the method results in a decrease in mean change of NT-probBNP levels of -278 pg/ml in a patient within 8 months of the start of treatment, relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone. 14. The method of claim 1, wherein the method satisfies at least one of the following conditions: a) the method results in a hazard ratio for time to composite endpoint of hospitalization for HF or cardiovascular death that is less than one in a patient relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone; b) the method results in a hazard ratio for time to composite endpoint of hospitalization for HF or cardiovascular death that is statistically nominally less than one in a patient relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone; c) the method results in a hazard ratio for time to composite endpoint of hospitalization for HF or cardiovascular death at eighteen (18) months of approximately 0.73 in a patient relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone; d) the method results in a 95% confidence interval for the hazard ratio for time to composite endpoint of hospitalization for HF or cardiovascular death at eighteen (18) months of approximately 0.60 to 0.89 in a patient relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone; e) the method numerically reduces the absolute risk of the composite endpoint of hospitalization for HF or cardiovascular death in a patient relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least standard of care HF agent alone; f) the method results in a nominally significant reduction in the rate of the composite endpoint of hospitalization for HF or cardiovascular death in a patient relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone; g) the method results in a numerical reduction in the composite endpoint of hospitalization for HF or cardiovascular death in a patient relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone; and/or h) the method results in a numerical reduction in the rate of composite endpoint of hospitalization for HF or cardiovascular death in a patient relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone. 15. The method of claim 1, wherein the method satisfies at least one of the following conditions: (a) the method results in a hazard ratio for time to all-cause mortality that is less than one in a patient relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone; b) the method results in a hazard ratio for time to all-cause mortality that is nominally significantly less than one in a patient relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone; c) the method results in a hazard ratio for time to all-cause mortality at eighteen (18) months of approximately 0.88 in a patient relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone; d) the method results in a 95% confidence interval for the hazard ratio for time to all-cause mortality at eighteen (18) months of approximately 0.70 to 1.12 in a patient relative to an administrative regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone; e) the method numerically reduces the absolute risk of all-cause mortality relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone; f) the method results in a nominally significant reduction in the rate of all-cause mortality in a patient relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone; g) the method results in a numerical reduction in all-cause mortality relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone; and/or h) the method results in a numerical reduction in the rate of all-cause mortality in a patient relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone. 16. The method of claim 1, wherein the method satisfies at least one of the following conditions: a) the method results in a rate ratio for total number of hospitalizations for HF events (first and recurrent) and CV death that is less than one in a patient relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone; b) the method results in a rate ratio for total number of hospitalizations for HF events (first and recurrent) and CV death that is nominally significantly less than one in a patient relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone; c) the method results in a rate ratio for total number of hospitalizations for HF events (first and recurrent) and CV death at eighteen (18) months of approximately 0.73 in a patient relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone; d) the method results in a 95% confidence interval for the rate ratio for total number of hospitalizations for HF events (first and recurrent) and CV death at eighteen (18) months of approximately 0.59 to 0.91 in a patient relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone; e) the method numerically reduces the absolute risk of the total number of hospitalizations for HF events (first and recurrent) and CV death in a patient relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone; f) the method results in a nominally significant reduction in the rate of total number of hospitalizations for HF events (first and recurrent) and CV death in a patient relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone; g) the method results in a numerical reduction in the total number of hospitalizations for HF events (first and recurrent) and CV death in a patient relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone; and/or h) the method results in a numerical reduction in the rate of total number of hospitalizations for HF events (first and recurrent) and CV death in a patient relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone. 17. A method of reducing the rate of hospitalization for heart failure and cardiovascular death in a patient following an acute myocardial infarction, comprising administering to the patient a pharmaceutical composition comprising a therapeutically effective amount of dapagliflozin; wherein the patient does not have type II diabetes; wherein the patient is also administered at least one standard of care HF agent; and wherein the rate for hospitalization for heart failure and cardiovascular death is reduced relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone. 18. The method of claim 17, wherein the patient has experienced an acute myocardial infarction within 7 days from initiation of treatment with a pharmaceutical comprising a therapeutically effective amount of dapagliflozin. 19. The method of claim 18, where the acute myocardial infarction is a ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or a non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. 20. The method of claim 17, wherein the hospitalizations for heart failure is due to one or more of the following: (i) new or worsening symptoms of HF experienced by the patient; (ii) objective evidence of new or worsening symptoms of HF; and/or (iii) initiation or intensification of treatment specifically for HF. 21. The method of claim 20, wherein the hospitalizations for heart failure includes first and/or recurrent hospitalizations for HF. 22. A method of reducing the rate of cardiovascular death or worsening heart failure symptoms in patients with acute decompensated heart failure, comprising administering to the patient a pharmaceutical composition comprising a therapeutically effective amount of dapagliflozin; wherein the patient does not have type II diabetes; wherein the patient is also administered at least one standard of care HF agent; and wherein the rate for cardiovascular death and worsening heart failure is reduced relative to an administration regimen where the patient receives at least one standard of care HF agent alone. 23. The method of claim 22, wherein the patient is hospitalized in stable condition for worsening heart failure symptoms or acute decompensated heart failure. 24. The method of claim 22, wherein the patient has a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of less than or equal to 40%. 25. The method of claim 22, wherein the reduction in the rate of worsening heart failure symptoms is satisfied by a reduction in hospitalizations for heart failure or reduction in urgent HF visits. 26. The method of claim 25, wherein the hospitalizations for heart failure includes first and/or recurrent hospitalizations for HF and is due to one or more of the following: (i) new or worsening symptoms of HF experienced by the patient; (ii) objective evidence of new or worsening symptoms of HF; and/or (iii) initiation or intensification of treatment specifically for HF. 27. The method of claim 25, wherein the urgent HF visits requires treatment for worsening heart failure other than just an increase in oral diuretics. 28. A method of reducing the risk of hyperkalemia in patients with heart failure, comprising administering to the patient a pharmaceutical composition comprising a therapeutically effective amount of an SGLT2 inhibitor. 29. The method of claim 28, wherein the risk of hyperkalemia is associated with MRA use in a patient with heart failure. 30. The method of claim 28, further comprising administering to the patient a therapeutically effective amount of AZD9977 or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. |
Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing
Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.