You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 17, 2025

Details for Patent: 10,105,374


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,105,374
Title:Controlled release and taste masking oral pharmaceutical compositions
Abstract: The invention relates to tablet comprising granules dispersed in at least one hydrophilic compound or matrix. The granules contain an active agent, at least one amphiphilic compound and at least one lipophilic compound. The tablet may include a gastro-resistant film coating.
Inventor(s): Villa; Roberto (Lecco, IT), Pedrani; Massimo (Gignese, IT), Ajani; Mauro (Milan, IT), Fossati; Lorenzo (Milan, IT)
Assignee: COSMO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED (Dublin, IE)
Application Number:15/646,538
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 10,105,374
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Comprehensive Analysis of US Patent 10,105,374: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

The United States Patent 10,105,374, titled "Controlled release oral pharmaceutical compositions of budesonide," represents a significant development in the field of pharmaceutical formulations. This patent, which is part of the "Villa I patents" family, claims priority to a 1999 application and focuses on controlled release budesonide formulations with a tablet core inside a gastro-resistant coating[1]. Let's delve into the intricacies of this patent, exploring its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape it inhabits.

Understanding the Patent's Core Technology

At its heart, US Patent 10,105,374 revolves around a novel approach to delivering budesonide, a corticosteroid used to treat various inflammatory conditions. The key innovation lies in the controlled release mechanism, which allows for a more targeted and efficient delivery of the active ingredient.

The Matrix Structure: A Key Component

One of the central elements of this patent is the concept of a "matrix" structure. This term has been a point of contention in legal proceedings, with different interpretations proposed by various parties[2].

The Court agrees it must consider the post-allowance statements as intrinsic evidence but also concludes that their context should be considered as well.[2]

The court's interpretation of the matrix structure as "a homogeneous structure in all its volume" has significant implications for the patent's scope and potential infringement cases.

Analyzing the Patent Claims

The claims of a patent define the boundaries of the invention's legal protection. In the case of US Patent 10,105,374, the claims focus on several key aspects:

1. Controlled Release Mechanism

The patent claims a specific method of controlling the release of budesonide, which is crucial for its therapeutic efficacy.

2. Tablet Core Composition

The composition of the tablet core, including the matrix structure, is detailed in the claims.

3. Gastro-resistant Coating

The patent describes a gastro-resistant coating, which plays a vital role in ensuring the drug reaches its intended target in the gastrointestinal tract.

The Patent Landscape: Contextualizing US Patent 10,105,374

To fully appreciate the significance of this patent, it's essential to consider the broader patent landscape in which it exists.

Recent Trends in Pharmaceutical Patents

The pharmaceutical industry has seen a surge in patent filings, with a particular focus on drug delivery systems and controlled release formulations. In 2024, there was a notable increase in patent litigation filings, reaching approximately 3,667 cases[3].

Venue Shifts in Patent Litigation

Interestingly, 2024 saw a shift in the preferred venues for patent litigation. The Eastern District of Texas experienced a significant increase in filings, while the Western District of Texas saw a decrease[3]. This shift can be attributed to changes in court policies, particularly regarding the assignment of patent cases to judges.

The Impact of USPTO Fee Changes

In January 2025, the USPTO implemented new patent fee changes, which have implications for patent applicants and holders[3]. These changes include:

  • An increase in design issue fees from $740 to $1,300
  • Requests for continued examination (RCE) fees rising from $2,000 to $2,860
  • Patent term extension application fees increasing from $1,180 to $2,500

These fee adjustments are designed to enhance patent examination quality and achieve pendency goals, but they also represent an additional cost consideration for patent applicants.

Measuring Patent Scope: Insights from Recent Research

Recent studies have proposed simple metrics for measuring patent scope based on claim language. Two key metrics are:

  1. Independent claim length
  2. Independent claim count

These metrics have shown explanatory power for several correlates of patent scope, including patent maintenance payments, forward citations, and the breadth of patent classes[6].

The Importance of Claim Scope in US Patent Applications

While broader claims may seem desirable, they often face more challenges during the examination process and are more vulnerable to invalidation attempts. The ideal claim scope depends on various factors, including:

  • The nature of the invention
  • The level of prior art
  • The applicant's budget
  • The specific technical field[9]

Balancing Breadth and Validity

Finding the right balance between claim breadth and validity is crucial. In fields with numerous patent applications, broader claims are more likely to encounter prior art references, making them harder to obtain and more expensive to prosecute[9].

The Role of AI in Patent Examination

As we look to the future, the role of artificial intelligence in patent examination is becoming increasingly significant. In 2024, the USPTO released guidance on patent subject matter eligibility, including considerations for AI-related inventions[4]. This development reflects the growing importance of AI in various fields of innovation and the need for patent systems to adapt accordingly.

Key Takeaways

  • US Patent 10,105,374 represents a significant innovation in controlled release budesonide formulations.
  • The interpretation of the "matrix" structure is crucial to understanding the patent's scope.
  • Recent changes in patent litigation venues and USPTO fees impact the broader patent landscape.
  • Measuring patent scope through claim language metrics can provide valuable insights.
  • Finding the right claim scope balance is essential for effective patent protection.
  • The role of AI in patent examination is an emerging area of focus for the USPTO.

FAQs

  1. Q: What is the primary innovation claimed in US Patent 10,105,374? A: The patent claims a controlled release oral pharmaceutical composition of budesonide, featuring a tablet core with a specific matrix structure inside a gastro-resistant coating.

  2. Q: How has the patent litigation landscape changed in recent years? A: There has been a shift in preferred venues, with the Eastern District of Texas seeing an increase in filings while the Western District of Texas experienced a decrease.

  3. Q: What are some simple metrics for measuring patent scope? A: Recent research suggests using independent claim length and independent claim count as metrics for measuring patent scope.

  4. Q: How do the recent USPTO fee changes affect patent applicants? A: The fee changes, implemented in January 2025, represent an overall increase in USPTO fees, which may impact patent prosecution strategies and costs for applicants.

  5. Q: What role is AI playing in patent examination? A: The USPTO has released guidance on patent subject matter eligibility that includes considerations for AI-related inventions, reflecting the growing importance of AI in innovation and patent systems.

Sources cited: [1] https://www.pharmaipcircle.com/uncategorized/budesonide-usa/ [2] https://casetext.com/case/valeant-pharm-intl-v-actavis-labs-fl-inc [3] https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/2024-patent-landscape-year-in-review-9676906/ [4] https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/07/17/2024-15377/2024-guidance-update-on-patent-subject-matter-eligibility-including-on-artificial-intelligence [6] https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2844964 [9] https://www.rimonlaw.com/the-importance-of-getting-the-claim-scope-right-in-a-us-patent-application-i/

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 10,105,374

ApplicantTradenameGeneric NameDosageNDAApproval DateTETypeRLDRSPatent No.Patent ExpirationProductSubstanceDelist Req.Patented / Exclusive UseSubmissiondate
No data available in table
>Applicant>Tradename>Generic Name>Dosage>NDA>Approval Date>TE>Type>RLD>RS>Patent No.>Patent Expiration>Product>Substance>Delist Req.>Patented / Exclusive Use>Submissiondate
Showing 0 to 0 of 0 entries

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 10,105,374

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
ItalyMI99A1317Jun 14, 1999
ItalyMI00A0422Mar 3, 2000

International Family Members for US Patent 10,105,374

CountryPatent NumberEstimated ExpirationSupplementary Protection CertificateSPC CountrySPC Expiration
Australia 5680100 ⤷  Try for Free
Austria 251449 ⤷  Try for Free
Canada 2377301 ⤷  Try for Free
China 1173695 ⤷  Try for Free
China 1355693 ⤷  Try for Free
Denmark 1183014 ⤷  Try for Free
Germany 60005819 ⤷  Try for Free
>Country>Patent Number>Estimated Expiration>Supplementary Protection Certificate>SPC Country>SPC Expiration
Showing 1 to 7 of 7 entries

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.