You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 26, 2024

Details for Patent: 10,357,616


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,357,616
Title:Injection device with an end of dose feedback mechanism
Abstract: An injection device with a dose delivering mechanism being adapted to provide a non-visual, e.g. audible and/or tactile, feedback signal when a set dose has been at least substantially injected. A first and a second part of the injection device are adapted to perform a relative rotational movement with respect to each other. The relative rotational movement causes at least two parts of the injection device to abut or engage, and this abutment or engagement causes the non-visual feedback signal to be generated. A very distinct and precise feedback is provided as compared to prior art axial solutions because the generation of the feedback signal is initiated by the relative rotational movement. Feedback signal may be generated by a change in a rotational velocity of at least one part, e.g. by changing the pitch of a threaded portion or by engaging a non-rotating part and a rotating part, thereby causing the non-rotating part to start rotating. May alternatively be generated by building up and releasing a tension. The injection device is suitable for injecting insulin.
Inventor(s): Moller; Claus Schmidt (Fredensborg, DK), Radmer; Bo (Hilleroed, DK), Nielsen; Lars Ulrik (Virum, DK), Enggaard; Christian Peter (Vejby, DK)
Assignee: Novo Nordisk A/S (Bagsvaerd, DK)
Application Number:15/815,976
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 10,357,616
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Delivery; Device;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

United States Patent 10,357,616: A Detailed Analysis of Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Introduction

The United States Patent 10,357,616, titled "Injection device with an end of dose feedback mechanism," is a significant patent in the field of medical devices, particularly for the administration of drugs such as insulin and other injectable medications. This patent is part of a broader landscape of intellectual property related to injection devices and pharmaceutical formulations.

Background and Context

The patent in question is held by Novo Nordisk A/S, a leading pharmaceutical company known for its innovations in diabetes treatment. The patent is one of several related to the Ozempic (semaglutide) product line, which has been the subject of extensive patent litigation[1][5].

Patent Scope and Claims

Invention Overview

The patent describes an injection device designed to provide a non-visual feedback signal to the user, indicating when a set dose has been injected. This is particularly useful for individuals who need to self-administer medications frequently, such as those with insulin-dependent diabetes or those requiring growth hormone treatments[4].

Key Claims

  • The patent includes claims related to the dose delivering mechanism, which is adapted to provide an audible and/or tactile feedback signal when the set dose is delivered.
  • The device features a dose setting member that, when dialed, causes an injection button to move from a retracted position to a protruded position. The button is then pushed back into the housing to deliver the dose, triggering a lock that produces an audible click or other feedback signal[4].

Technical Details

  • The device ensures that the dose setting mechanism returns to zero after each injection, allowing the user to accurately track the doses administered.
  • The mechanism involves a nut and piston rod system, where one element is kept in a fixed position while the other rotates to set the dose. This design ensures precise and unambiguous dose setting[4].

Patent Landscape

Related Patents

The patent 10,357,616 is part of a larger family of patents related to injection devices and pharmaceutical formulations. Other relevant patents include:

  • U.S. Patent No. 9,132,239: "Dial-Down Mechanism for Wind-Up Pen"
  • U.S. Patent No. 10,335,462: "Use of Long-Acting GLP-1 Peptides"
  • U.S. Patent No. 9,861,757: "Injection Device with an End of Dose Feedback Mechanism" (similar to the '616 patent but with different claims)[1][5].

Patent Litigation

This patent is involved in ongoing litigation related to the Ozempic product line. Multiple generic manufacturers, such as Mylan, have filed Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs) seeking FDA approval for generic versions of Ozempic, which has led to patent infringement claims. The litigation involves multiple patents, including the '616 patent, and is centralized in the District of Delaware for efficiency and consistency in pretrial rulings[1][5].

Importance of Claim Scope

The scope of the claims in the '616 patent is crucial for its validity and enforceability. As highlighted in patent law, overly broad claims can be easier to invalidate due to issues such as the abstract idea exception or failure to meet the written description requirement[3].

Balancing Claim Scope

The patent application process requires a balance between broad protection and specificity. The claims in the '616 patent are designed to be specific enough to avoid invalidation while still offering significant protection for the invention. This balance is critical in technical fields with extensive prior art, where broader claims may be more susceptible to invalidation[3].

Industry Impact

The '616 patent and related patents have significant implications for the pharmaceutical and medical device industries. These patents protect innovative technologies that enhance patient safety and convenience, particularly for those requiring frequent self-administration of medications.

Competitive Landscape

The patent landscape around Ozempic and related injection devices is highly competitive, with multiple companies seeking to develop generic or alternative products. The enforcement of these patents is crucial for maintaining market exclusivity and protecting the investments made in research and development[1][5].

Future Developments

As the patent landscape continues to evolve, there are several key factors to consider:

  • Legislative Changes: Ongoing legislative activities could shift the legal framework regarding what is patentable, potentially impacting the validity and scope of existing patents[3].
  • Technological Advancements: Continuous innovation in medical devices and pharmaceutical formulations will likely lead to new patents and further litigation.
  • Litigation Outcomes: The outcomes of current and future litigation will shape the competitive landscape and influence the development of generic and alternative products[1][5].

Key Takeaways

  • The United States Patent 10,357,616 is a critical patent for injection devices, providing non-visual feedback to users.
  • The patent is part of a broader landscape of intellectual property related to Ozempic and other pharmaceutical formulations.
  • The scope and claims of the patent are carefully balanced to avoid invalidation while offering significant protection.
  • The patent is involved in ongoing litigation, highlighting the competitive nature of the pharmaceutical and medical device industries.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

What is the main innovation of the United States Patent 10,357,616?

The main innovation is an injection device that provides a non-visual feedback signal, such as an audible or tactile signal, to indicate when a set dose has been delivered.

Why is the claim scope important in patent applications?

The claim scope is important because overly broad claims can be easier to invalidate, while too narrow claims may not offer sufficient protection. A balanced claim scope is essential for maintaining the validity and enforceability of the patent.

What is the significance of the '616 patent in the context of Ozempic litigation?

The '616 patent is one of several patents asserted in litigation related to Ozempic, a product line of Novo Nordisk A/S. It is central to the company's efforts to protect its intellectual property and maintain market exclusivity.

How does the patent landscape around injection devices impact the pharmaceutical industry?

The patent landscape around injection devices influences the development of generic and alternative products, shapes market competition, and protects innovations that enhance patient safety and convenience.

What are the potential implications of legislative changes on patents like the '616 patent?

Legislative changes could alter the criteria for what is considered patentable, potentially affecting the validity and scope of existing patents, including the '616 patent.

Cited Sources:

  1. U.S. Courts, "OZEMPIC (SEMAGLUTIDE) PATENT LITIGATION MDL No. 3038" [PDF].
  2. RPX Insight, "in the united states district court" [PDF].
  3. Rimon Law, "The Importance of Getting the Claim Scope Right in a US Patent Application".
  4. Google Patents, "US10357616B2 - Injection device with an end of dose feedback mechanism".
  5. RPX Insight, "OZEMPIC (SEMAGLUTIDE) ) MDL No. 22-MD-3038 (CFC)" [PDF].

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 10,357,616

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Novo OZEMPIC semaglutide SOLUTION;SUBCUTANEOUS 209637-001 Dec 5, 2017 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe Y ⤷  Subscribe
Novo OZEMPIC semaglutide SOLUTION;SUBCUTANEOUS 209637-004 Oct 6, 2022 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe Y ⤷  Subscribe
Novo OZEMPIC semaglutide SOLUTION;SUBCUTANEOUS 209637-002 Apr 9, 2019 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe Y ⤷  Subscribe
Novo OZEMPIC semaglutide SOLUTION;SUBCUTANEOUS 209637-003 Mar 28, 2022 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe Y ⤷  Subscribe
Novo SAXENDA liraglutide SOLUTION;SUBCUTANEOUS 206321-001 Dec 23, 2014 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe Y ⤷  Subscribe
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 10,357,616

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
05075187Jan 25, 2005

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.