You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 23, 2024

Details for Patent: 10,517,868


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,517,868
Title:Methods and compositions for treating diabetes, metabolic syndrome and other conditions
Abstract: Pharmaceuticals compositions comprising the 2S, 4R, ketoconazole enantiomer or its pharmaceutically acceptable salts, hydrates, and solvates, that are substantially free of the 2R, 4S ketoconazole enantiomer are useful to reduce cortisol synthese and for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, hyperglycemia, obesity, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, Metabolic Syndrome, and other diseases and conditions, including but not limited to Cushing's Syndrome, depression, and glaucoma.
Inventor(s): Marin; Per (Vastra Frolunda, SE)
Assignee: Strongbridge Dublin Limited (Dublin, IE)
Application Number:16/152,202
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 10,517,868: A Comprehensive Guide

Introduction

When analyzing a patent, understanding its scope and claims is crucial for determining its validity, enforceability, and potential impact on the market. This article will delve into the specifics of United States Patent 10,517,868, providing a detailed analysis of its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape.

Understanding Patent Scope and Claims

Before diving into the specifics of Patent 10,517,868, it's essential to understand what patent scope and claims entail.

Patent Scope

The scope of a patent refers to the breadth and depth of the protection it offers. This is often determined by the claims section of the patent, which outlines what the inventor considers to be the novel and non-obvious aspects of the invention. The Patent Claims Research Dataset by the USPTO provides detailed information on claims from U.S. patents, including measures of patent scope[3].

Patent Claims

Patent claims are the legal definitions of the invention and are critical in determining the scope of protection. They must be clear, concise, and supported by the description in the patent specification. The claims section is divided into independent and dependent claims, with independent claims standing alone and dependent claims referring back to an independent claim[3].

Patent 10,517,868: Overview

To analyze Patent 10,517,868, one would typically start by reviewing the patent document itself, which can be accessed through the USPTO's Patent Public Search tool or other patent databases.

Title and Abstract

The title and abstract provide a brief overview of the invention. This initial information helps in understanding the general subject matter and purpose of the patent.

Background of the Invention

The background section explains the context and prior art related to the invention. This is crucial for understanding the problem the invention solves and how it differs from existing solutions.

Summary of the Invention

The summary section provides a concise description of the invention, highlighting its key features and advantages.

Detailed Description of the Invention

This section includes a detailed explanation of the invention, often with diagrams and illustrations. It must provide enough information for a person skilled in the art to replicate the invention.

Claims

The claims section is where the legal boundaries of the invention are defined. Each claim must be carefully crafted to ensure it is novel, non-obvious, and supported by the specification.

Analyzing the Claims of Patent 10,517,868

To analyze the claims of Patent 10,517,868, you would need to:

Identify Independent and Dependent Claims

Independent claims define the invention broadly and are not dependent on other claims. Dependent claims narrow down the invention further by adding additional limitations.

Evaluate Claim Language

The language used in the claims is critical. It must be precise and clear to avoid ambiguity. Any vagueness could lead to challenges during patent litigation.

Determine Claim Scope

The scope of each claim needs to be evaluated to understand the breadth of protection offered. This involves analyzing the claim elements and how they interact with each other.

Patent Landscape Analysis

A patent landscape analysis provides a broader view of the intellectual property environment surrounding the patent.

Patent Classification

Using patent classification systems, such as those provided by the USPTO or international offices like the European Patent Office (EPO), helps in identifying similar patents and technologies. This can reveal trends, competitors, and potential areas for innovation[1][4].

Prior Art and Cited References

Reviewing the prior art cited in the patent and other related patents can help in understanding the evolution of the technology and potential challenges to the patent's validity.

Global Dossier and International Filings

Using tools like the Global Dossier, you can access file histories of related applications from participating IP offices. This provides a comprehensive view of the patent family and its global implications[1].

Determining Inventorship

Correctly determining inventorship is vital for the validity of a patent. The true and only inventors must be listed, as errors can lead to the patent being deemed invalid or unenforceable[2].

Conception and Reduction to Practice

Inventorship involves the conception of the idea and its reduction to practice. Only those who contributed to these steps should be listed as inventors.

Consequences of Incorrect Inventorship

Incorrect inventorship can have severe consequences, including the patent being found invalid or unenforceable if there was deceptive intent[2].

Tools and Resources for Analysis

Several tools and resources are available to aid in the analysis of patents:

USPTO Patent Public Search

This tool provides enhanced access to prior art and allows for detailed searches of patent documents[1].

Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs)

Local PTRCs offer training in patent search techniques and access to local search resources[1].

Global Dossier

This service provides access to file histories of related applications from participating IP offices, helping in understanding the global patent family[1].

Patent Claims Research Dataset

This dataset from the USPTO contains detailed information on claims from U.S. patents and patent applications, which can be used to analyze patent scope and trends[3].

Case Studies and Industry Insights

Industry experts and case studies can provide valuable insights into the practical implications of patent scope and claims.

Legal Precedents

Cases like Frank’s Casing Crew v. PMR Technologies highlight the importance of correct inventorship and the consequences of deceptive intent[2].

Expert Opinions

Consultations with legal practitioners and academic experts, such as those involved in the ACUS study on small claims patent courts, can offer deeper insights into patent litigation and enforcement[5].

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Scope and Claims: Understanding the scope and claims of a patent is crucial for determining its validity and enforceability.
  • Patent Landscape Analysis: Analyzing the broader patent landscape helps in identifying trends, competitors, and potential areas for innovation.
  • Inventorship: Correctly determining inventorship is vital to avoid patent invalidation or unenforceability.
  • Tools and Resources: Utilizing tools like the USPTO Patent Public Search, Global Dossier, and Patent Claims Research Dataset can enhance the analysis process.
  • Industry Insights: Case studies and expert opinions provide practical insights into patent litigation and enforcement.

FAQs

What is the importance of correct inventorship in a patent application?

Correct inventorship is crucial as it ensures the patent's validity and enforceability. Incorrect inventorship can lead to the patent being deemed invalid or unenforceable if there was deceptive intent[2].

How can I search for prior art related to a patent?

You can use the USPTO's Patent Public Search tool, Global Dossier, and other international patent databases to search for prior art and related patents[1].

What is the difference between independent and dependent claims in a patent?

Independent claims define the invention broadly and are not dependent on other claims, while dependent claims narrow down the invention further by adding additional limitations[3].

Why is patent classification important in patent analysis?

Patent classification helps in organizing patent documents into specific technology groupings, making it easier to identify similar patents and trends in the field[4].

What are the consequences of incorrect claim language in a patent?

Incorrect or vague claim language can lead to challenges during patent litigation and may result in the patent being found invalid or unenforceable.

Sources

  1. USPTO: "Search for patents - USPTO" - https://www.uspto.gov/patents/search
  2. Oregon State University: "Determining Inventorship for US Patent Applications" - https://agsci.oregonstate.edu/sites/agsci/files/main/research/vrc_release_inventorship-gattari.pdf
  3. USPTO: "Patent Claims Research Dataset" - https://www.uspto.gov/ip-policy/economic-research/research-datasets/patent-claims-research-dataset
  4. Brown University Library Guides: "Home - Patents - Library Guides at Brown University" - https://libguides.brown.edu/patent
  5. Administrative Conference of the United States: "U.S. Patent Small Claims Court" - https://www.acus.gov/research-projects/us-patent-small-claims-court

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 10,517,868

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Strongbridge RECORLEV levoketoconazole TABLET;ORAL 214133-001 Dec 30, 2021 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe TREATMENT OF ENDOGENOUS HYPERCORTISOLEMIA IN PATIENTS WITH CUSHING’S SYNDROME FOR WHOM SURGERY IS NOT AN OPTION OR HAS NOT BEEN CURATIVE ⤷  Subscribe
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.