You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 27, 2024

Details for Patent: 10,940,138


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 10,940,138 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 10,940,138 protects UPNEEQ and is included in one NDA.

This patent has twenty-one patent family members in sixteen countries.

Summary for Patent: 10,940,138
Title:Compositions and methods for treating ocular disorders
Abstract: The present disclosure is directed to compositions comprising oxymetazoline and methods of treating various eye disorders related to drooping eyelids, such as ptosis, in a subject comprising administering to the subject compositions comprising oxymetazoline.
Inventor(s): deVries; Tina (Bridgewater, NJ), Jacobs; David (Bernardsville, NJ)
Assignee: RVL Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Bridgewater, NJ)
Application Number:17/063,416
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 10,940,138: A Comprehensive Guide

Introduction

When analyzing a patent, particularly one like United States Patent 10,940,138, it is crucial to understand the scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape. This article will delve into the key aspects of patent analysis, using the specified patent as a case study.

Understanding Patent Scope

Patent scope is a critical aspect of patent analysis, often debated in the context of patent quality. The scope of a patent is typically measured through metrics such as independent claim length and independent claim count[3].

Metrics for Measuring Patent Scope

  • Independent Claim Length: Longer claims often indicate broader scope but can also lead to increased ambiguity and potential litigation issues.
  • Independent Claim Count: A higher number of independent claims can suggest a broader scope, but it also increases the complexity of the patent.

Patent Claims Analysis

Claim Construction

Patent claims are the heart of any patent application. Clear and consistent claim construction is essential to avoid ambiguity and unexpected interpretations during litigation.

Consistency in Claim Terms

Using terms consistently throughout the patent application is vital. Minor variations in terminology can significantly impact claim constructions and lead to disputes[5].

Avoiding Ambiguity

Even commonly used terms, such as "mate" and "engaged," should be clearly defined in the specification to prevent unexpected claim constructions. This clarity ensures that the intended meaning is conveyed without room for misinterpretation[5].

Claim Types

  • Independent Claims: These claims stand alone and define the invention without reference to other claims.
  • Dependent Claims: These claims refer back to and further limit the independent claims.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Prior Art Search

Conducting a thorough prior art search is essential to determine the novelty and non-obviousness of the invention. Tools like the USPTO's Patent Public Search, Global Dossier, and international patent databases (e.g., EPO's esp@cenet, JPO, WIPO's PATENTSCOPE) are invaluable for this purpose[1].

Patent Family and Dossier

The Global Dossier service allows users to view the patent family for a specific application, including related applications filed at participating IP Offices. This helps in understanding the broader context of the patent and any office actions or citations related to it[1].

Case Study: United States Patent 10,940,138

Patent Overview

To analyze the scope and claims of United States Patent 10,940,138, one must first understand the invention itself. Here are the key steps:

Identify the Invention

  • Determine the main subject matter of the patent.
  • Review the abstract and summary sections for a concise overview.

Review Claims

  • Analyze the independent and dependent claims.
  • Check for clarity and consistency in claim terms.
  • Evaluate the scope of the claims using metrics like claim length and count.

Prior Art Analysis

  • Use tools like Patent Public Search and Global Dossier to identify prior art.
  • Compare the claims of the patent with prior art to assess novelty and non-obviousness.

Example Analysis

For instance, if the patent is related to medical equipment development, one would need to analyze how the claims engage with existing technologies and innovations in the field. Tools like TRIZ (Theory of Inventive Problem Solving) can be used to evaluate the inventive step and problem-solving methodologies employed in the patent[4].

International Patent Considerations

Searching International Patent Offices

To ensure global uniqueness, it is crucial to search patent databases from other countries. Databases such as the European Patent Office's esp@cenet, Japan Patent Office, and World Intellectual Property Organization's PATENTSCOPE provide access to international patent applications and granted patents[1].

Legal and Policy Considerations

Patent Quality and Litigation

The quality of patent claims can significantly impact litigation outcomes. Broader claims with unclear language can lead to longer and more complex prosecutions, potentially impeding innovation[3].

Small Claims Patent Court

There have been discussions and studies on the feasibility of a small claims patent court to address the high costs and complexities associated with patent litigation. Such a court could streamline the process for smaller entities and individual inventors[2].

Tools and Resources for Patent Analysis

USPTO Resources

  • Patent Public Search: A powerful tool for searching prior art and patent applications.
  • Global Dossier: Provides access to file histories and related applications from participating IP Offices.
  • Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs): Local resources for training in patent search techniques[1].

International Resources

  • European Patent Office (EPO): esp@cenet network of Europe's patent databases.
  • Japan Patent Office (JPO): Access to Japanese patents with machine translations.
  • World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO): PATENTSCOPE search service for international patent applications[1].

Key Takeaways

  • Clear Claim Construction: Ensure consistent and clear use of terms in patent claims to avoid ambiguity.
  • Thorough Prior Art Search: Use various tools to identify prior art and assess novelty and non-obviousness.
  • Global Considerations: Search international patent databases to ensure global uniqueness.
  • Patent Scope Metrics: Use independent claim length and count to measure patent scope.
  • Legal and Policy Awareness: Understand the implications of patent quality on litigation and innovation.

FAQs

What is the importance of clear claim construction in a patent?

Clear claim construction is crucial to avoid ambiguity and ensure that the intended meaning of the claims is conveyed without room for misinterpretation. This clarity helps in preventing unexpected claim constructions during litigation.

How can I conduct a thorough prior art search for a patent?

Use tools like the USPTO's Patent Public Search, Global Dossier, and international patent databases such as EPO's esp@cenet, JPO, and WIPO's PATENTSCOPE to identify prior art and assess novelty and non-obviousness.

What are the key metrics for measuring patent scope?

The key metrics include independent claim length and independent claim count. These metrics help in understanding the breadth and complexity of the patent claims.

Why is it important to search international patent databases?

Searching international patent databases ensures that the invention is unique globally and helps in identifying any related applications or prior art that may affect the patent's validity.

What are the implications of broader patent claims on litigation?

Broader patent claims with unclear language can lead to longer and more complex prosecutions, potentially increasing litigation costs and impeding innovation.

Sources

  1. USPTO - Search for patents: https://www.uspto.gov/patents/search
  2. ACUS - U.S. Patent Small Claims Court: https://www.acus.gov/research-projects/us-patent-small-claims-court
  3. Hoover Institution - Patent Claims and Patent Scope: https://www.hoover.org/sites/default/files/ip2-wp16001-paper.pdf
  4. Science.gov - Medical equipment development: https://www.science.gov/topicpages/m/medical+equipment+development
  5. Crowell & Moring - Do Your Patents Claim Engagement of Components as Intended?: https://www.crowell.com/en/insights/client-alerts/patent-counsel-do-your-patents-claim-engagement-of-components-as-intended

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 10,940,138

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Rvl Pharms UPNEEQ oxymetazoline hydrochloride SOLUTION/DROPS;OPHTHALMIC 212520-001 Jul 8, 2020 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe METHOD OF TREATING BLEPHAROPTOSIS ⤷  Subscribe
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 10,940,138

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2020268329 ⤷  Subscribe
Brazil 112021022404 ⤷  Subscribe
Canada 3139443 ⤷  Subscribe
Chile 2021002918 ⤷  Subscribe
China 111888326 ⤷  Subscribe
China 117045596 ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.