You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 11,083,797


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 11,083,797
Title:Long-acting polymeric delivery systems
Abstract: Compositions comprised of a delivery vehicle or delivery system and an active agent dispersed within the delivery vehicle or system, wherein the delivery vehicle or system contains a polyorthoester polymer and a polar aprotic solvent. Also disclosed are low viscosity delivery systems for administration of active agents. The low viscosity delivery systems have a polyorthoester polymer, a polar aprotic solvent and a solvent containing a triglyceride viscosity reducing agent. Compositions described include an amide- or anilide-type local anesthetic of the "caine" classification, and a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), along with related methods, e.g., for treatment of post-operative pain or for prophylactic treatment of pain. The compositions are suitable for delivery via, e.g., direct application and instillation, intradermal injection, subcutaneous injection, and nerve block (perineural).
Inventor(s): Ottoboni; Thomas B. (Belmont, CA), Girotti; Lee Ann Lynn (San Bruno, CA)
Assignee: Heron Therapeutics, Inc. (San Diego, CA)
Application Number:15/702,697
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Compound; Delivery;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 11,083,797: A Comprehensive Guide

Introduction

When analyzing a patent, understanding its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape is crucial for inventors, businesses, and legal professionals. This article will delve into the details of United States Patent 11,083,797, providing a thorough analysis of its scope, claims, and the relevant patent landscape.

Understanding Patent Scope and Claims

Before diving into the specifics of the patent in question, it is essential to understand what patent scope and claims entail.

Patent Scope

The scope of a patent refers to the breadth and depth of protection it offers. This is determined by the claims section of the patent, which outlines what the inventor considers to be their invention. The scope can be influenced by various factors, including the language used in the claims, the prior art cited, and the prosecution history of the patent[3].

Patent Claims

Patent claims are the heart of a patent, defining the boundaries of the invention. They must be clear, concise, and supported by the patent's description. Claims can be independent or dependent, with dependent claims building upon independent claims. The claims section is where the inventor specifies what they believe is novel and non-obvious about their invention[3].

Patent 11,083,797: Overview

To analyze the scope and claims of United States Patent 11,083,797, one must first identify the key elements of the patent.

Title and Abstract

The title and abstract provide a preliminary understanding of the invention. For example, if the patent is titled "Method and System for [Specific Invention]," the abstract will give a brief summary of what the invention entails and its primary features.

Background of the Invention

This section provides context about the existing technology and the problems the invention aims to solve. It helps in understanding the motivation behind the invention and how it differs from prior art.

Summary of the Invention

This section gives a more detailed overview of the invention, including its key components and how it operates. It sets the stage for the detailed description that follows.

Detailed Description of the Invention

Here, the inventor provides a comprehensive explanation of the invention, including drawings, diagrams, and detailed descriptions of each component. This section is crucial for understanding the scope of the patent.

Claims

The claims section is where the inventor explicitly defines what they consider to be their invention. Each claim must be carefully crafted to ensure it is valid and enforceable.

Analyzing the Claims of Patent 11,083,797

To analyze the claims, one must look at both the independent and dependent claims.

Independent Claims

Independent claims stand alone and define the invention without reference to other claims. They are typically broader and more general.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims build upon independent claims and are more specific. They often add additional limitations or features to the independent claims.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Understanding the patent landscape involves looking at related patents, prior art, and the global patent system.

Prior Art

Prior art includes all existing knowledge and inventions in the field that predate the filing of the patent. It is crucial to ensure that the patent is novel and non-obvious over the prior art[1].

Related Patents

Identifying related patents helps in understanding how the invention fits into the broader technological landscape. Tools like the USPTO's Patent Public Search and Global Dossier can be used to find related patents and their file histories[1].

International Patent Landscape

The global patent landscape is important, especially if the invention has international implications. Databases such as those provided by the European Patent Office (EPO), Japan Patent Office (JPO), and World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) can be used to search for similar patents filed in other countries[1].

Tools for Patent Analysis

Several tools and resources are available for conducting a thorough patent analysis.

USPTO Patent Public Search

This tool provides enhanced access to prior art and is a powerful resource for searching U.S. patents and published patent applications[1].

Global Dossier

This service allows users to access the file histories of related applications from participating IP Offices, providing a comprehensive view of the patent family[1].

Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs)

These centers offer local search resources and training in patent search techniques, which can be invaluable for detailed analysis[1].

Case Law and Legal Considerations

Understanding the legal context is crucial when analyzing a patent.

Obviousness-Type Double Patenting

This doctrine, as seen in cases like Allergan USA, Inc. v. MSN Laboratories Private Ltd., prohibits the issuance of multiple patents for the same invention. It is important to ensure that claims are patentably distinct from other related patents[2].

Presumption of Validity

Under 35 USC 282, each claim of a patent is presumed valid. However, this presumption can be challenged through various defenses, such as prior art or obviousness[5].

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Scope and Claims: The scope is defined by the claims, which must be clear, concise, and supported by the patent's description.
  • Patent Landscape: Understanding prior art, related patents, and the global patent landscape is essential.
  • Tools and Resources: Utilize tools like USPTO Patent Public Search, Global Dossier, and PTRCs for comprehensive analysis.
  • Legal Considerations: Ensure claims are patentably distinct and understand the presumption of validity.

FAQs

Q: What is the importance of the claims section in a patent? A: The claims section is crucial as it defines the boundaries of the invention and specifies what the inventor considers to be novel and non-obvious.

Q: How do I search for related patents? A: Use tools like the USPTO's Patent Public Search, Global Dossier, and databases from other international intellectual property offices.

Q: What is obviousness-type double patenting? A: This doctrine prohibits the issuance of multiple patents for the same invention, ensuring that claims are patentably distinct from other related patents.

Q: What is the presumption of validity in patent law? A: Under 35 USC 282, each claim of a patent is presumed valid, but this can be challenged through various defenses.

Q: Why is understanding the global patent landscape important? A: It helps in identifying similar patents filed in other countries and ensures that the invention does not infringe on existing international patents.

Sources

  1. USPTO - Search for patents: https://www.uspto.gov/patents/search
  2. ALLERGAN USA, INC. v. MSN LABORATORIES PRIVATE LTD.: https://cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions-orders/24-1061.OPINION.8-13-2024_2366074.pdf
  3. USPTO - Patent Claims Research Dataset: https://www.uspto.gov/ip-policy/economic-research/research-datasets/patent-claims-research-dataset
  4. U.S. Department of Commerce - U.S. Patent and Trademark Office: https://www.commerce.gov/bureaus-and-offices/uspto
  5. 35 USC 282: Presumption of validity; defenses: https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid%3AUSC-1994-title35-section282&num=0&edition=1994

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 11,083,797

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Heron Theraps Inc ZYNRELEF KIT bupivacaine; meloxicam SOLUTION, EXTENDED RELEASE;PERIARTICULAR 211988-001 May 12, 2021 DISCN Yes No 11,083,797 ⤷  Subscribe Y TREATMENT OF POSTSURGICAL PAIN PROVIDING ANALGESIA TO A PATIENT FOR UP TO 72 HOURS, FOR EXAMPLE, AFTER BUNIONECTOMY, OPEN INGUINAL HERNIORRHAPHY, OR TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY VIA SOFT TISSUE OR PERIARTICULAR INSTILLATION ⤷  Subscribe
Heron Theraps Inc ZYNRELEF KIT bupivacaine; meloxicam SOLUTION, EXTENDED RELEASE;PERIARTICULAR 211988-002 May 12, 2021 RX Yes Yes 11,083,797 ⤷  Subscribe Y TREATMENT OF POSTSURGICAL PAIN PROVIDING ANALGESIA TO A PATIENT FOR UP TO 72 HOURS, FOR EXAMPLE, AFTER BUNIONECTOMY, OPEN INGUINAL HERNIORRHAPHY, OR TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY VIA SOFT TISSUE OR PERIARTICULAR INSTILLATION ⤷  Subscribe
Heron Theraps Inc ZYNRELEF KIT bupivacaine; meloxicam SOLUTION, EXTENDED RELEASE;PERIARTICULAR 211988-003 May 12, 2021 DISCN Yes No 11,083,797 ⤷  Subscribe Y TREATMENT OF POSTSURGICAL PAIN PROVIDING ANALGESIA TO A PATIENT FOR UP TO 72 HOURS, FOR EXAMPLE, AFTER BUNIONECTOMY, OPEN INGUINAL HERNIORRHAPHY, OR TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY VIA SOFT TISSUE OR PERIARTICULAR INSTILLATION ⤷  Subscribe
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.