You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 11, 2025

Details for Patent: 11,753,301


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 11,753,301
Title:Sodium thiosulfate-containing pharmaceutical compositions
Abstract:Provided herein are pharmaceutically acceptable sodium thiosulfate and pharmaceutical compositions thereof. Also provided herein are methods for determining the total non-purgeable organic carbon in a sodium thiosulfate-containing sample. Further provided herein are methods for producing pharmaceutically acceptable sodium thiosulfate. Still further provided herein are methods of treatment comprising the administration of pharmaceutically acceptable sodium thiosulfate.
Inventor(s):Craig Sherman, Catherine Marie Smith, Kevin Robert Wirtz, Erich Schulze
Assignee:Hope Medical Enterprises Inc
Application Number:US18/108,803
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of a US Patent: A Detailed Analysis Using US Patent 11,753,301 as an Example

Introduction

When navigating the complex world of patents, understanding the scope and claims of a patent is crucial for inventors, businesses, and legal professionals. This article will delve into the intricacies of patent scope and claims, using US Patent 11,753,301 as a case study to illustrate key concepts.

What is a Patent?

A patent is a form of intellectual property that grants the owner the exclusive right to make, use, sell, and distribute an invention for a specified period, typically 20 years from the filing date. Patents are governed by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) under Title 35 of the United States Code[2].

Patent Eligibility Under 35 U.S.C. § 101

Before a patent can be granted, the invention must meet the eligibility criteria outlined in 35 U.S.C. § 101. This section stipulates that patents can be obtained for "any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any improvement thereof." However, it excludes laws of nature, natural phenomena, and abstract ideas unless they are transformed into a patent-eligible application through an inventive concept[2].

The Structure of a Patent

A patent typically consists of several key sections:

  • Background of the Invention: Provides context and prior art related to the invention.
  • Summary of the Invention: A brief overview of the invention.
  • Detailed Description of the Invention: A detailed explanation of the invention, including drawings and diagrams.
  • Claims: The most critical part of the patent, as they define the scope of protection.

Understanding Patent Claims

Patent claims are the legal definitions of the invention and determine the scope of the patent. There are two main types of claims:

  • Independent Claims: Standalone claims that define the invention without referencing other claims.
  • Dependent Claims: Claims that refer back to and further limit an independent claim[3].

Claim Construction

The construction of claims is a critical aspect of patent law. Claims must be clear, concise, and definite to avoid ambiguity. The USPTO and courts use various tools and guidelines to interpret claims, ensuring they are not overly broad or vague.

The Scope of a Patent

The scope of a patent is defined by its claims. Here are some key aspects to consider:

Claim Scope Measurements

The USPTO provides datasets and tools to analyze the scope of patents. For example, the Patent Claims Research Dataset includes detailed information on claims from US patents and applications, allowing for the analysis of claim-level statistics and document-level statistics. This dataset helps in understanding the breadth and depth of patent claims[3].

Patent Scope Trends

Research by the USPTO, such as the work by Marco, Sarnoff, and deGrazia, has developed measures of patent scope. These measures help in understanding how broad or narrow a patent's claims are, which is essential for determining the patent's impact and potential for litigation[3].

Case Study: US Patent 11,753,301

To illustrate these concepts, let's consider a hypothetical analysis of US Patent 11,753,301, though the specific details of this patent are not provided here.

Eligibility Under 35 U.S.C. § 101

First, the patent must pass the eligibility test under 35 U.S.C. § 101. This involves determining if the invention is directed to a patent-ineligible concept (like an abstract idea) and if the claim elements, individually or in combination, add enough to transform the claim into a patent-eligible application[2].

Claim Analysis

  • Independent Claims: Identify the independent claims that define the core of the invention.
  • Dependent Claims: Analyze how dependent claims further limit the independent claims, adding specificity and narrowing the scope.
  • Claim Construction: Ensure that the claims are clear and definite, avoiding any ambiguity that could lead to disputes.

Scope of Protection

  • Breadth of Claims: Determine how broad or narrow the claims are. Broader claims may offer more protection but are also more likely to face challenges.
  • Claim Scope Measurements: Use datasets and tools provided by the USPTO to quantify the scope of the patent claims.

Continuation Procedures and Their Impact

Continuation procedures can significantly affect the scope and claims of a patent. These procedures allow applicants to file additional applications based on the original (progenitor) application, which can result in multiple patents from a single initial filing. This includes Requests for Continued Examination (RCEs), continuations-in-part, and divisional applications. These procedures can complicate the calculation of allowance rates and the overall scope of protection[1].

Global Patent Landscape

The global patent landscape is increasingly interconnected. Tools like the Global Dossier service provided by the USPTO allow users to access file histories of related applications from participating IP offices. This facilitates a more comprehensive understanding of the patent family and its global implications[4].

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Eligibility: Ensure the invention meets the criteria under 35 U.S.C. § 101.
  • Claim Construction: Claims must be clear, concise, and definite.
  • Scope of Protection: Understand the breadth and depth of the patent claims.
  • Continuation Procedures: These can significantly impact the scope and number of patents derived from a single initial filing.
  • Global Considerations: Use tools like the Global Dossier to understand the global patent landscape.

FAQs

What is the purpose of patent claims?

Patent claims define the scope of protection for an invention, specifying what is covered by the patent.

How are patent claims constructed?

Claims are constructed to be clear, concise, and definite, with independent claims defining the core of the invention and dependent claims further limiting them.

What is the difference between independent and dependent claims?

Independent claims stand alone and define the invention without referencing other claims, while dependent claims refer back to and further limit an independent claim.

How do continuation procedures affect patent scope?

Continuation procedures can result in multiple patents from a single initial filing, complicating the calculation of allowance rates and the overall scope of protection.

What tools are available for analyzing patent scope?

The USPTO provides datasets like the Patent Claims Research Dataset and tools like the Global Dossier to analyze and understand the scope of patents.

Sources

  1. Carley, M., & Hegde, D. (n.d.). What Is the Probability of Receiving a US Patent?. The Yale Journal of Law & Technology.
  2. Electric Power Group, LLC v. Alstom S.A. (2016). United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
  3. USPTO. (2017). Patent Claims Research Dataset. United States Patent and Trademark Office.
  4. USPTO. (2018). Search for patents. United States Patent and Trademark Office.

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 11,753,301

Showing 1 to 2 of 2 entries

International Family Members for US Patent 11,753,301

CountryPatent NumberEstimated ExpirationSupplementary Protection CertificateSPC CountrySPC Expiration
Australia 2010270605 ⤷  Try for Free
Canada 2767168 ⤷  Try for Free
Denmark 2451435 ⤷  Try for Free
>Country>Patent Number>Estimated Expiration>Supplementary Protection Certificate>SPC Country>SPC Expiration
Showing 1 to 3 of 3 entries

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.