You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 20, 2025

Details for Patent: 11,857,646


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 11,857,646
Title:Methods for making ultrasound contrast agents
Abstract:Provided herein are improved methods for preparing phospholipid formulations including phospholipid UCA formulations.
Inventor(s):Simon P. Robinson, Robert W. Siegler, Nhung Tuyet Nguyen, David C. Onthank, Tarakeshwar Vishwanath Anklekar, Charles Chester Van Kirk
Assignee:Lantheus Medical Imaging Inc
Application Number:US17/325,173
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of a U.S. Patent: A Detailed Guide Using the Example of United States Patent 11,857,646

Introduction to Patent Analysis

When analyzing a U.S. patent, it is crucial to understand the scope and claims of the patent, as these elements define the intellectual property rights granted to the patent holder. This article will provide a comprehensive guide on how to analyze the scope and claims of a U.S. patent, using United States Patent 11,857,646 as an example.

Understanding Patent Claims

What are Patent Claims?

Patent claims are the legal definitions of the invention, outlining what the patent holder is entitled to protect. They are the most critical part of a patent application and must be clear, concise, and specific[4].

Types of Patent Claims

There are two main types of patent claims: independent claims and dependent claims. Independent claims stand alone and define the invention without reference to other claims. Dependent claims, on the other hand, refer back to and further limit an independent claim or another dependent claim[4].

Analyzing the Scope of a Patent

Patent Scope Measurements

The scope of a patent is often measured by analyzing the claims and the prior art cited. The USPTO's Patent Claims Research Dataset provides detailed information on claims from U.S. patents, including claim-level statistics and document-level statistics. This dataset helps in understanding the scope of patents by analyzing the dependency relationships between claims and the overall patent scope[3].

Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)

The Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) system is a critical tool for determining the scope of a patent. It helps in identifying relevant classification schemes, which can be used to search for similar patents and understand the broader technological area in which the patent resides[1].

Step-by-Step Analysis of Patent 11,857,646

Retrieving the Patent Document

To analyze the patent, start by retrieving the full-text document of United States Patent 11,857,646 from the USPTO's Patent Public Search database or other patent search tools like PATENTSCOPE or the European Patent Office's worldwide database[1][4].

Reading the Abstract and Background

The abstract provides a brief summary of the invention, while the background section gives context and explains the problem the invention solves. This information helps in understanding the overall purpose and scope of the patent.

Examining the Claims

Carefully read through the claims section, identifying both independent and dependent claims. Analyze each claim to understand what specific aspects of the invention are being protected.

Understanding Claim Dependencies

Identify how dependent claims relate to independent claims. This helps in understanding the hierarchical structure of the patent and the specific limitations imposed by each claim.

Reviewing the Description and Drawings

The detailed description and drawings provide further context to the claims. They explain how the invention works and can include examples and embodiments that illustrate the scope of the patent.

Legal and Technical Aspects

Patent Eligibility

Ensure that the claims are directed to patent-eligible subject matter. The Supreme Court's "Alice" test is often used to determine if claims are directed to abstract ideas or natural phenomena, which are not patentable. This involves a two-step process: determining if the claims are directed to an abstract idea, and if so, whether they include elements that transform them into a patent-eligible application[5].

Prior Art and Citation Analysis

Use tools like the Common Citation Document (CCD) to analyze prior art cited by various patent offices. This helps in understanding how the patent office viewed the novelty and non-obviousness of the invention during the examination process[4].

Practical Tools for Patent Analysis

USPTO Resources

The USPTO provides several resources for patent analysis, including the Patent Public Search tool, Global Dossier, and the Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs). These resources offer enhanced access to prior art, file histories, and other relevant data[4].

International Databases

Databases like PATENTSCOPE and the European Patent Office's worldwide database allow for full-text searching of patent grants and applications from over 100 patent offices around the world. These tools are essential for a comprehensive global patent landscape analysis[1].

Case Studies and Legal Precedents

Contour IP Holding LLC v. GoPro, Inc.

In cases like Contour IP Holding LLC v. GoPro, Inc., the court's analysis of patent claims and their eligibility under the "Alice" test can provide valuable insights into how courts interpret patent scope. Such precedents can guide the analysis of similar patents[5].

Key Takeaways

  • Understand the Claims: The claims section is the heart of a patent, defining what is protected.
  • Use Classification Systems: Tools like the CPC help in identifying relevant technological areas.
  • Analyze Prior Art: Tools like the CCD provide insights into how the patent office viewed the invention's novelty.
  • Check Patent Eligibility: Ensure claims are directed to patent-eligible subject matter using tests like the "Alice" test.
  • Utilize USPTO Resources: Tools like Patent Public Search and Global Dossier are crucial for comprehensive analysis.

FAQs

What is the purpose of the claims section in a patent?

The claims section legally defines the invention and outlines what the patent holder is entitled to protect.

How do I determine the scope of a patent?

Use tools like the CPC, analyze the claims and prior art, and review the detailed description and drawings.

What is the "Alice" test?

The "Alice" test is a two-step process used to determine if patent claims are directed to patent-eligible subject matter, specifically checking if claims are directed to abstract ideas and if they include elements that transform them into a patent-eligible application.

Where can I find full-text patent documents?

Full-text patent documents can be found using the USPTO's Patent Public Search, PATENTSCOPE, or the European Patent Office's worldwide database.

What is the role of the Common Citation Document (CCD)?

The CCD consolidates prior art cited by participating patent offices, enabling a single-point access to citation data for a patent application.

Sources

  1. Clemson University Libraries: "Advanced Patent Searching" - Clemson.libguides.com
  2. Acquisition.gov: "Requirements for filing an administrative claim for patent infringement" - Acquisition.gov
  3. USPTO: "Patent Claims Research Dataset" - USPTO.gov
  4. USPTO: "Search for patents" - USPTO.gov
  5. CAFC: "CONTOUR IP HOLDING LLC v. GOPRO, INC." - CAFC.uscourts.gov

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 11,857,646

Showing 1 to 2 of 2 entries

International Family Members for US Patent 11,857,646

CountryPatent NumberEstimated ExpirationSupplementary Protection CertificateSPC CountrySPC Expiration
Australia 2017291815 ⤷  Try for Free
Brazil 112018074469 ⤷  Try for Free
Canada 3025580 ⤷  Try for Free
China 109562194 ⤷  Try for Free
China 116370659 ⤷  Try for Free
Eurasian Patent Organization 201892568 ⤷  Try for Free
European Patent Office 3458110 ⤷  Try for Free
>Country>Patent Number>Estimated Expiration>Supplementary Protection Certificate>SPC Country>SPC Expiration
Showing 1 to 7 of 7 entries

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.