You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 13, 2025

Details for Patent: 12,109,196


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 12,109,196 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 12,109,196 protects IGALMI and is included in one NDA.

This patent has eleven patent family members in eleven countries.

Summary for Patent: 12,109,196
Title:Non-sedating dexmedetomidine treatment regimens
Abstract:Disclosed herein are methods of administering relatively high doses of dexmedetomidine or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof to a human subject, without also inducing significant sedation. The disclosed methods are particularly suitable for the treatment of agitation, especially when associated with neurodegenerative and/or neuropsychiatric diseases such as schizophrenia, bipolar illness such as bipolar disorder or mania, dementia, depression, or delirium.
Inventor(s):Vasukumar KAKUMANU, David Christian HANLEY, Frank Yocca, Chetan Dalpatbhai LATHIA, Lavanya Rajachandran, Robert Risinger
Assignee:Bioxcel Therapeutics Inc
Application Number:US18/443,689
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of a US Patent: A Detailed Guide Using US Patent 12,109,196 as an Example

Introduction

When analyzing the scope and claims of a US patent, it is crucial to understand the intricacies of patent law, the process of patent searching, and the importance of accurate claim drafting. This article will delve into these aspects using US Patent 12,109,196 as a case study, although the specific details of this patent are not provided here. We will cover the general principles and tools that can be applied to any patent analysis.

Understanding Patent Claims

What are Patent Claims?

Patent claims define the scope of protection granted by a patent. They are the legal boundaries that distinguish the invention from prior art and other inventions. Claims must be clear, concise, and supported by the specification of the patent application[3].

Types of Claims

  • Independent Claims: These claims stand alone and define the invention without reference to other claims.
  • Dependent Claims: These claims refer back to and further limit an independent claim.
  • Method Claims: Describe a process or method.
  • Apparatus Claims: Describe a device or system.
  • Composition Claims: Describe a chemical or material composition.

Drafting Claims: Avoiding Common Pitfalls

The Importance of Claim Scope

A common misconception is that broader claims are better. However, overly broad claims can be risky as they are more likely to be invalidated due to abstract idea exceptions or failure to meet the written description requirement[3].

Abstract Idea Exception

The Supreme Court's decision in Alice v. CLS Bank established a framework for determining whether a claimed invention is directed to an abstract idea and thus patent ineligible. Claims that invoke generic processes and machinery without improving the relevant technology can fall into this exception[3].

Conducting a Preliminary Patent Search

Before drafting claims, it is essential to conduct a thorough patent search to ensure the invention is novel and non-obvious.

Tools for Patent Searching

  • Patent Public Search: A modern web-based tool that replaced legacy search tools like PubEast and PubWest. It provides enhanced access to prior art[1].
  • Global Dossier: Allows users to view the patent family for a specific application, including related applications from participating IP Offices[1].
  • Public Search Facility: Located in Alexandria, VA, this facility provides access to patent and trademark information in various formats[1].
  • Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs): Local resources that offer training in patent search techniques[1].

Determining Inventorship

Who Are the True and Only Inventors?

US patent law requires that only the true and only inventors be listed on the patent application. Inventorship is determined by the conception of the idea, which is the formation in the mind of the inventor of a definite and permanent idea of the complete and operative invention[2].

Conception and Reduction to Practice

Conception is complete when the idea is sufficiently definite and permanent to permit one with ordinary skill in the field to reduce it to practice without undue experimentation. Errors in inventorship can be corrected, but deceptive intent can render the patent unenforceable[2].

Evaluating Subject Matter Eligibility

Guidance from the USPTO

The USPTO provides guidance on evaluating the subject matter eligibility of claims in patent applications. This includes assessing whether the claims are directed to abstract ideas, laws of nature, or natural phenomena[4].

Analyzing the Patent Landscape

International Patent Offices

To ensure global novelty, it is crucial to search patent databases from international offices such as the European Patent Office (EPO), Japan Patent Office (JPO), and the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)[1].

Common Citation Document (CCD)

The CCD application consolidates prior art cited by all participating offices for the family members of a patent application, enabling a single-point access to citation data[1].

Case Study: US Patent 12,109,196

While specific details of US Patent 12,109,196 are not provided here, the following steps can be applied to analyze its scope and claims:

Review the Claims

  • Identify the independent and dependent claims.
  • Determine the type of claims (method, apparatus, composition).
  • Analyze the claim language for clarity and specificity.

Evaluate the Specification

  • Ensure the claims are supported by the specification.
  • Check for any inconsistencies between the claims and the description.

Conduct a Prior Art Search

  • Use tools like Patent Public Search and Global Dossier to identify prior art.
  • Review the Common Citation Document (CCD) for any relevant citations.

Assess Subject Matter Eligibility

  • Apply the USPTO guidance on subject matter eligibility.
  • Check if the claims fall under the abstract idea exception or other ineligible categories.

Verify Inventorship

  • Ensure the listed inventors are the true and only inventors.
  • Review the conception and reduction to practice steps to validate inventorship.

Key Takeaways

  • Clear and Specific Claims: Ensure claims are clear, concise, and supported by the specification.
  • Avoid Overly Broad Claims: Broad claims can be risky and may be invalidated.
  • Thorough Prior Art Search: Use various tools to ensure the invention is novel and non-obvious.
  • Accurate Inventorship: Correctly identify the true and only inventors to avoid legal issues.
  • Subject Matter Eligibility: Ensure claims meet the subject matter eligibility criteria.

FAQs

Q: What is the importance of claim scope in a patent application? A: The claim scope defines the legal boundaries of the invention and must be clear, concise, and supported by the specification. Overly broad claims can be risky and may be invalidated.

Q: How do I determine the true and only inventors for a patent application? A: Inventorship is determined by the conception of the idea, which is the formation in the mind of the inventor of a definite and permanent idea of the complete and operative invention.

Q: What tools can I use to conduct a preliminary patent search? A: Tools include the Patent Public Search, Global Dossier, Public Search Facility, and Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs).

Q: Why is it important to evaluate subject matter eligibility? A: Evaluating subject matter eligibility ensures that the claims do not fall under ineligible categories such as abstract ideas, laws of nature, or natural phenomena.

Q: How can I ensure my patent claims are not too broad? A: Avoid generalizing the invention too far, ensure the claims are anchored to the embodiments in the disclosure, and be mindful of the abstract idea exception.

Sources

  1. USPTO - Search for patents.
  2. Determining Inventorship for US Patent Applications.
  3. The Importance of Getting the Claim Scope Right in a US Patent Application.
  4. 2024 Guidance Update on Patent Subject Matter Eligibility.
  5. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) | USAGov.

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 12,109,196

Showing 1 to 2 of 2 entries

International Family Members for US Patent 12,109,196

CountryPatent NumberEstimated ExpirationSupplementary Protection CertificateSPC CountrySPC Expiration
Australia 2020316013 ⤷  Try for Free
Brazil 112022000992 ⤷  Try for Free
Canada 3145388 ⤷  Try for Free
China 114375191 ⤷  Try for Free
European Patent Office 3999058 ⤷  Try for Free
Israel 289735 ⤷  Try for Free
Japan 2022540706 ⤷  Try for Free
>Country>Patent Number>Estimated Expiration>Supplementary Protection Certificate>SPC Country>SPC Expiration
Showing 1 to 7 of 7 entries

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.