You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 18, 2025

Details for Patent: 3,438,991


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 3,438,991
Title:1-aroylalkyl derivatives of arylhydroxypyrrolidines and arylhydroxy-piperidines
Abstract:
Inventor(s):Paul Adriaan Jan Janssen
Assignee:Research Laboratorium C Janssen NV
Application Number:US69282A
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

United States Patent 3,438,991: A Detailed Analysis of Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Introduction

United States Patent 3,438,991, though not specifically detailed in the provided sources, can be analyzed through a general framework that applies to patent analysis. Here, we will discuss the key components of a patent, how to analyze its scope and claims, and the broader patent landscape in which it exists.

Understanding the Patent Document

To analyze the scope and claims of any patent, including U.S. Patent 3,438,991, one must start by examining the patent document itself. Here are the critical sections to focus on:

Title and Abstract

The title and abstract provide a brief overview of the invention. They help in understanding the general subject matter and the main contributions of the patent.

Background of the Invention

This section explains the context and prior art related to the invention. It helps in identifying the problems the patent aims to solve and how it differs from existing solutions.

Summary of the Invention

This section provides a concise description of the invention, including its key features and how it works.

Detailed Description of the Invention

Here, the patent describes the invention in detail, often including drawings and diagrams. This section is crucial for understanding the technical aspects of the invention.

Claims

The claims section is the most critical part of the patent as it defines the scope of the invention. Claims are legal statements that define what the inventor considers to be their invention and are used to determine infringement.

Analyzing the Claims

When analyzing the claims of U.S. Patent 3,438,991, consider the following:

Independent and Dependent Claims

Independent claims stand alone and define the invention without reference to other claims. Dependent claims refer back to an independent claim and further limit the invention.

Claim Language

The language used in the claims is precise and legalistic. Each word and phrase has a specific meaning that can affect the scope of the patent.

Claim Scope

The scope of the claims determines what is protected by the patent. Broader claims may cover more variations of the invention, while narrower claims may be more specific but less inclusive.

Patent Landscape Analysis

A patent landscape analysis provides a broader context in which the patent exists. Here are some steps to perform such an analysis:

Identify Relevant Patents

Use patent search databases to identify other patents related to the same technology area. This includes searching by keywords, IPC (International Patent Classification) codes, and other relevant classifications[3].

Analyze Patent Filings and Trends

Look at the number of patents filed in the relevant technology area over time. This can indicate trends in innovation and competition. For example, in 2016, approximately 3.1 million patent applications were filed worldwide, indicating a high level of innovation activity[3].

Geographical Distribution

Analyze the geographical distribution of patent activity. This can reveal where the most innovative work is being done and by whom. For instance, patent intensity can be measured by the number of patents issued to inventors in a particular county divided by the total population[4].

Competitor Analysis

Identify key competitors in the same technology area. Analyze their patent portfolios to understand their strategic focus and potential future developments.

Technical and Legal Considerations

When analyzing a patent like U.S. Patent 3,438,991, it is crucial to consider both technical and legal aspects.

Technical Feasibility

Assess whether the invention is technically feasible and how it compares to existing solutions. This involves evaluating the detailed description and drawings provided in the patent.

Legal Validity

Consider the legal validity of the patent, including issues such as obviousness, novelty, and non-obviousness. For example, the concept of obviousness-type double patenting (ODP) can invalidate claims if they are deemed obvious over earlier patents in the same family[1].

Case Law and Regulatory Framework

Understanding relevant case law and the regulatory framework is essential for a comprehensive analysis.

Case Law

Cases like Novartis AG v. Ezra Ventures LLC and Berkheimer v. HP, Inc. provide guidance on patent eligibility and the scope of patent protection. For instance, Novartis AG v. Ezra Ventures LLC clarifies that ODP does not invalidate a validly obtained Patent Term Extension (PTE)[1].

Regulatory Framework

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is the agency responsible for granting U.S. patents and registering trademarks. Understanding the USPTO's guidelines and procedures is vital for navigating the patent system[2].

Key Takeaways

  • Detailed Analysis: A thorough analysis of a patent involves examining its title, abstract, background, summary, detailed description, and claims.
  • Claims Scope: The claims define the scope of the invention and are critical for determining infringement.
  • Patent Landscape: Analyzing the broader patent landscape helps in understanding trends, competitors, and geographical distribution of innovation.
  • Technical and Legal Considerations: Both technical feasibility and legal validity are crucial for assessing the strength and relevance of a patent.
  • Regulatory Framework: Understanding the USPTO's guidelines and relevant case law is essential for navigating the patent system.

FAQs

  1. What is the importance of the claims section in a patent? The claims section is the most critical part of a patent as it legally defines the scope of the invention and determines what is protected by the patent.

  2. How do you perform a patent landscape analysis? A patent landscape analysis involves identifying relevant patents, analyzing patent filings and trends, examining geographical distribution, and conducting competitor analysis.

  3. What is obviousness-type double patenting (ODP)? ODP is a legal concept that can invalidate patent claims if they are deemed obvious over earlier patents in the same family.

  4. Why is understanding case law important in patent analysis? Case law provides guidance on patent eligibility, scope of protection, and other legal aspects that can affect the validity and enforceability of a patent.

  5. What role does the USPTO play in the patent system? The USPTO is responsible for granting U.S. patents and registering trademarks, and understanding its guidelines and procedures is vital for navigating the patent system.

Sources

  1. In re Cellect - United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit[1]
  2. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) - USAGov[2]
  3. How to perform a patent landscape analysis in 5 key steps - IP Checkups[3]
  4. Invention, Knowledge Transfer, and Innovation - NCSES[4]
  5. SANDERLING MANAGEMENT LTD. v. SNAP INC - United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit[5]

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 3,438,991

ApplicantTradenameGeneric NameDosageNDAApproval DateTETypeRLDRSPatent No.Patent ExpirationProductSubstanceDelist Req.Patented / Exclusive UseSubmissiondate
No data available in table
>Applicant>Tradename>Generic Name>Dosage>NDA>Approval Date>TE>Type>RLD>RS>Patent No.>Patent Expiration>Product>Substance>Delist Req.>Patented / Exclusive Use>Submissiondate
Showing 0 to 0 of 0 entries

International Family Members for US Patent 3,438,991

CountryPatent NumberEstimated ExpirationSupplementary Protection CertificateSPC CountrySPC Expiration
United Kingdom 895309 ⤷  Try for Free
>Country>Patent Number>Estimated Expiration>Supplementary Protection Certificate>SPC Country>SPC Expiration
Showing 1 to 1 of 1 entries

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.