You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 21, 2025

Details for Patent: 3,591,564


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 3,591,564
Title:Transparent polyamides from tetrahydrotricyclopentadienylene diamines
Abstract:PRODUCTION OF TRANSPARENT POLYAMIDES OF TETRAHYDROTRICYCLOPENTADIENYLENE DIAMINES HAVING THE FORMULA: DI(H2N-)PERHYDRO-4,9:5,8-DIMETHANOCYCLOPENTA(B)NAPHTHALENE WHEREIN SAID DIAMINES ARE POLYCONDENSED WITH DICARBOXYLIC ACIDS, DICARBOXYLIC ESTERS OR DICARBOXYLIC CHLORIDES AT ELEVATED TEMPERATURE, AND NEW POLYAMIDES CONTAINING SAID DIAMINES.
Inventor(s):Paul Raff, Ludwig Schuster, Guenter Becht, Helmut Doerfel
Assignee:BASF SE
Application Number:US738739*A
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of a U.S. Patent: A Detailed Guide Using United States Patent 3,591,564 as an Example

Introduction to U.S. Patents

U.S. patents are granted by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and provide exclusive rights to the inventor or assignee for a specified period. Understanding the components of a U.S. patent is crucial for analyzing its scope and claims.

Structure of a U.S. Patent

A typical U.S. patent includes several key sections:

  • Document Number and Type: The prefix "US" indicates it is a U.S. patent, and the code (e.g., B2) signifies if it has a previously published application[1].
  • Title of the Invention: A brief description limited to 500 characters or less[1].
  • Abstract: A non-technical summary of the invention[1].
  • Specification: A detailed written description of the invention, including prior art, drawings, and the preferred embodiment[1].
  • Claims: Define the legal boundaries of the invention, starting with phrases like “I claim” or “What is claimed”[1].

Understanding the Claims

The claims section is the most critical part of a patent as it defines the scope of protection. Here’s how to analyze the claims:

Types of Claims

  • Independent Claims: Standalone claims that define the invention without referencing other claims.
  • Dependent Claims: Build upon independent claims, often narrowing the scope[1].

Example from United States Patent 3,591,564

While the specific details of this patent are not provided in the sources, we can use a general approach to analyze its claims:

  • Identify Independent Claims: Look for claims that do not reference other claims. These will provide the broadest definition of the invention.
  • Analyze Dependent Claims: These will add specific details or limitations to the independent claims, narrowing the scope.

Patent Landscape Analysis

A patent landscape analysis is essential for understanding the broader context of a patent within its technological field.

Steps in Patent Landscape Analysis

  1. Define the Scope: Identify the specific technology area and relevant keywords.
  2. Conduct a Patent Search: Use tools like the USPTO Public Search Facility or online databases to gather patent data[4].
  3. Analyze Patent Filings: Review the number of patent applications, key players, and trends in the field[3].
  4. Identify Key Patents: Determine which patents are most relevant and influential in the field.
  5. Visualize the Data: Use tools like the Common Citation Document (CCD) to consolidate and visualize citation data[4].

Example Application

For United States Patent 3,591,564, you would:

  • Identify Relevant Classifications: Use the IPC and national classifications to understand the technological area.
  • Search Related Patents: Look for other patents cited in the references section or those that cite this patent.
  • Analyze Trends: Determine if this patent is part of a larger trend in the field and who the key players are.

Field of Search and Prior Art

The field of search and prior art are crucial for understanding the novelty and non-obviousness of the invention.

Field of Search

  • This section lists the classifications consulted by the patent examiner during the prior art search[1].

Prior Art

  • The specification includes a discussion of related prior art, which are previously issued patents and other publications relevant to the invention[1].

Drawings and Specification

Drawings

  • The drawings section contains illustrations of the technical details of the invention. Not all inventions require drawings, especially those related to processes or methods[1].

Specification

  • This section must describe the invention in sufficient detail so that anyone of ordinary skill in the same technical field can understand it. It includes a description of the drawings, how the invention solves a specific technical problem, and the preferred embodiment of the invention[1].

Assignee, Inventors, and Patent Attorney

Understanding who is involved in the patent can provide insights into the ownership and development of the invention.

Assignee

  • The assignee is the owner of the patent at the time it was issued. This can be a person, company, or organization[1].

Inventors

  • The inventors are listed, and their expertise can provide context about the invention’s development[1].

Patent Attorney

  • The patent attorney or firm is responsible for prosecuting the application[1].

Term Adjustment and Expiration

Term Adjustment

  • Additional days may be added to the term of the patent to compensate for processing delays[1].

Patent Expiration

  • Patents typically expire 20 years from the earliest filing date, but term adjustments can affect this[1].

Legal Implications and Litigation

Patents can be involved in legal disputes, particularly regarding infringement and validity.

Infringement

  • If another party uses the invention without permission, it may be considered infringement. Legal cases, such as Osseo Imaging, LLC v. Planmeca USA Inc., illustrate how courts determine infringement and non-obviousness[5].

Validity

  • Patents must be novel and non-obvious. Challenges to validity often involve prior art and expert testimony to determine if the invention meets these criteria[5].

Key Takeaways

  • Understand the Structure: A U.S. patent includes a title, abstract, specification, and claims.
  • Analyze Claims: Claims define the scope of protection, with independent claims providing the broadest definition.
  • Conduct Patent Landscape Analysis: Identify trends, key players, and relevant patents to understand the broader context.
  • Review Prior Art and Field of Search: Understand the novelty and non-obviousness of the invention.
  • Consider Legal Implications: Patents can be involved in infringement and validity disputes.

FAQs

Q: What is the purpose of the claims section in a U.S. patent? A: The claims section defines the legal boundaries of the invention, specifying what is protected by the patent.

Q: How do I conduct a patent landscape analysis? A: Define the scope, conduct a patent search, analyze patent filings, identify key patents, and visualize the data.

Q: What is prior art in the context of a U.S. patent? A: Prior art includes previously issued patents and other publications relevant to the invention, discussed in the specification.

Q: Who can be the assignee of a U.S. patent? A: The assignee can be a person, company, or organization that owns the patent at the time it is issued.

Q: How long does a U.S. patent typically last? A: A U.S. patent typically lasts 20 years from the earliest filing date, but term adjustments can affect this duration.

Sources

  1. How to Read a U.S. Patent - Patents and Designs - Research Guides https://guides.library.queensu.ca/c.php?g=501420&p=3436527
  2. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) | USAGov https://www.usa.gov/agencies/u-s-patent-and-trademark-office
  3. How to perform a patent landscape analysis in 5 key steps https://www.ipcheckups.com/patent-landscape-analysis-how-to-5-steps/
  4. Search for patents - USPTO https://www.uspto.gov/patents/search
  5. OSSEO IMAGING, LLC v. PLANMECA USA INC. https://cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions-orders/23-1627.OPINION.9-4-2024_2378780.pdf

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 3,591,564

ApplicantTradenameGeneric NameDosageNDAApproval DateTETypeRLDRSPatent No.Patent ExpirationProductSubstanceDelist Req.Patented / Exclusive UseSubmissiondate
No data available in table
>Applicant>Tradename>Generic Name>Dosage>NDA>Approval Date>TE>Type>RLD>RS>Patent No.>Patent Expiration>Product>Substance>Delist Req.>Patented / Exclusive Use>Submissiondate
Showing 0 to 0 of 0 entries

International Family Members for US Patent 3,591,564

CountryPatent NumberEstimated ExpirationSupplementary Protection CertificateSPC CountrySPC Expiration
Austria 258268 ⤷  Try for Free
Belgium 671585 ⤷  Try for Free
Belgium 678466 ⤷  Try for Free
France 1452457 ⤷  Try for Free
Germany 1239302 ⤷  Try for Free
Germany 1570246 ⤷  Try for Free
Switzerland 464896 ⤷  Try for Free
>Country>Patent Number>Estimated Expiration>Supplementary Protection Certificate>SPC Country>SPC Expiration
Showing 1 to 7 of 7 entries

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.