You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 22, 2025

Details for Patent: 3,592,930


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 3,592,930
Title:Moisture-deterioratable topical medicaments,particularly anti-inflammatory steroids,in a substantially non-aqueous fatty alcohol-propylene glycol vehicle
Abstract:A SUBSTANTIALLY NON-AQUEOUS MEDICANT VEHICLE CONTAINING FROM 15 TO 45 PARTS SATURATED FATTY ALCOHOL HAVING FROM 16 TO 24 CARBONS, FROM 55 TO 85 PARTS GLYCOL SOLVENT, FROM 0 TO 10 PARTS PLASTICIZER, FROM 0 TO 10 PARTS COUPLING AGENT, 0 TO 20 PARTS PENETRANT, AND IF DESIRED, OTHER PHARMACEUTICAL ADJUVANTS. THIS BASE IS A SUITABLE VEHICLE FOR ALL TYPES OF THERAPEUTIC AGENTS FOR TOPICAL APPLICATION INCLUDING ANTIBIOTICS, STEROIDS, ANTIHISTAMINES, ANTISEPTICS, ANESTHETICS, ANTIBACTERAIALS, FUNGICIDES, AND THE LIKE. THE VEHICLE HAS SHOWN PARTICULAR ADVANTAGES WITH ANTI-INFLAMMATORY TOPICAL CORTICOIDS.
Inventor(s):Martin Katz, Herbert M Neiman
Assignee:Syntex Pharmaceuticals International Ltd
Application Number:US745989A
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of a U.S. Patent: A Detailed Analysis of United States Patent 3,592,930

Introduction to U.S. Patents

To analyze the scope and claims of a U.S. patent, it is crucial to understand the structure and components of a patent document. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is responsible for granting these patents, and each document contains specific sections that provide detailed information about the invention[2].

Structure of a U.S. Patent Document

A U.S. patent document is divided into several key sections, each serving a distinct purpose:

Bibliographic Data

The front page of the patent includes bibliographic data identified by INID codes. These codes provide essential information such as the document number, application number, date of application, date of patent, IPC classification, and national classification[1].

Abstract

The abstract is a brief, non-technical description of the invention, limited to 500 characters or less. It provides a general overview of what the patent covers[1].

Field of Search

This section lists the classifications consulted by the patent examiner during the prior art search. It helps in understanding the broader context of the invention[1].

Specification

The specification is a detailed written description of the invention. It includes discussions of related prior art, descriptions of the drawings, how the invention solves a specific technical problem, and the preferred embodiment of the invention. The specification must be detailed enough for anyone of ordinary skill in the same technical field to understand and replicate the invention[1].

Drawings

The drawings section contains black and white drawings that illustrate the technical details of the invention. These drawings are not required for all types of inventions, such as those related to processes or methods[1].

Claims

The claims section defines the scope of protection for the patent. It is preceded by the phrases “I claim” or “What is claimed” and consists of numbered claims that legally define the boundaries of the invention[1].

Analyzing the Claims of United States Patent 3,592,930

To analyze the scope and claims of United States Patent 3,592,930, we need to focus on the claims section.

Understanding the Claims

Claims are the most critical part of a patent application as they define the legal boundaries of the invention. Here are some key points to consider:

  • Number and Scope: The patent must have at least one claim, but it can have several or even hundreds of claims. Each claim defines a specific aspect of the invention.
  • Claim Language: Claims are written in a specific legal language that outlines what is being claimed. For example, a claim might describe a device, its components, and how these components interact.
  • Enablement Requirement: The claims must be supported by the specification, which must describe the invention in sufficient detail to enable a person skilled in the art to make and use the invention[5].

Example of a Claim

Here is an example of how a claim might be structured:

1. A portable electronic device, comprising:
   a first housing;
   a second housing coupled to the first housing and movable relative thereto between a closed position and an open position;
   an antenna positioned in the first housing;
   a low frequency shield coupled to the antenna and adapted to inhibit changes to the frequency response of the antenna when the portable electronic device is moved between the open position and the closed position; and
   a high frequency chassis resonator coupled to the low frequency shield and adapted to increase high frequency sensitivity of the antenna.

This example illustrates how claims are detailed and specific, defining each component and its function within the invention.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Analyzing the patent landscape involves understanding the broader context in which the patent exists. Here are some key aspects to consider:

Prior Art and References

The patent document includes references to prior art, which are U.S. and foreign patent documents and other publications cited as related by the inventor and patent examiner. This section helps in understanding how the current invention differs from existing technologies[1].

Classification and Search

The patent is classified using IPC and national classification codes. These classifications can be used to search for similar patents and understand the patent family and related applications through tools like the Global Dossier and Common Citation Document (CCD)[4].

Global Dossier and CCD

The Global Dossier provides access to the file histories of related applications from participating IP Offices, allowing users to see the patent family and related classifications, citations, and office actions. The CCD consolidates prior art citations from multiple offices, facilitating a comprehensive search[4].

Claim Coverage and Patent Analytics

To fully understand the scope and claims of a patent, it is beneficial to use patent analytics tools:

Claim Coverage Matrix

A Claim Coverage Matrix helps identify which patents and claims are actively protecting the intellectual property and where gaps or opportunities exist. This involves categorizing patents by claims and overarching scope concepts, which can be filtered, searched, and analyzed efficiently[3].

Claim Charts

Claim charts generated by software like ClaimScape® make it easy to review patent coverage with technical experts. These charts help determine whether a particular scope concept is applicable to a target product or method, highlighting gaps in current coverage and future design opportunities[3].

Key Takeaways

  • Detailed Specification: The specification must describe the invention in sufficient detail to enable anyone of ordinary skill in the same technical field to understand and replicate it.
  • Claims Define Boundaries: Claims are crucial as they legally define the scope of protection for the patent.
  • Patent Landscape: Understanding prior art, classifications, and global dossier data is essential for a comprehensive analysis.
  • Patent Analytics: Tools like Claim Coverage Matrix and Claim Charts are vital for managing and analyzing large numbers of patent claims.

FAQs

Q: What is the purpose of the abstract in a U.S. patent document? A: The abstract provides a brief, non-technical description of the invention, giving a general overview of what the patent covers.

Q: Why are drawings important in a patent document? A: Drawings illustrate the technical details of the invention, helping to clarify the written description and making it easier for others to understand and replicate the invention.

Q: What is the enablement requirement in patent law? A: The enablement requirement mandates that the specification describe the invention in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the invention[5].

Q: How can patent analytics tools help in managing patent claims? A: Patent analytics tools like Claim Coverage Matrix and Claim Charts help in categorizing and analyzing large numbers of patent claims, identifying gaps in coverage, and highlighting future design opportunities[3].

Q: What is the Global Dossier, and how does it help in patent searches? A: The Global Dossier provides access to the file histories of related applications from participating IP Offices, allowing users to see the patent family, classifications, citations, and office actions, facilitating a comprehensive search[4].

Sources

  1. Guides.library.queensu.ca: How to Read a U.S. Patent - Patents and Designs - Research Guides.
  2. USA.gov: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) - USAGov.
  3. SLWIP.com: Patent Analytics | Intellectual Property Law.
  4. USPTO.gov: Search for patents - USPTO.
  5. Supremecourt.gov: Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi (05/18/23) - Supreme Court.

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 3,592,930

ApplicantTradenameGeneric NameDosageNDAApproval DateTETypeRLDRSPatent No.Patent ExpirationProductSubstanceDelist Req.Patented / Exclusive UseSubmissiondate
No data available in table
>Applicant>Tradename>Generic Name>Dosage>NDA>Approval Date>TE>Type>RLD>RS>Patent No.>Patent Expiration>Product>Substance>Delist Req.>Patented / Exclusive Use>Submissiondate
Showing 0 to 0 of 0 entries

International Family Members for US Patent 3,592,930

CountryPatent NumberEstimated ExpirationSupplementary Protection CertificateSPC CountrySPC Expiration
Belgium 737875 ⤷  Try for Free
Canada 989304 ⤷  Try for Free
Denmark 124857 ⤷  Try for Free
France 2013281 ⤷  Try for Free
Germany 1934334 ⤷  Try for Free
Switzerland 516312 ⤷  Try for Free
>Country>Patent Number>Estimated Expiration>Supplementary Protection Certificate>SPC Country>SPC Expiration
Showing 1 to 6 of 6 entries

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.