Details for Patent: 3,839,315

Summary for Patent: 3,839,315

Title:	NOVEL PEPTIDES HAVING CHOLECYSTOKININ ACTIVITY AND INTERMEDIATES THEREFOR
Abstract:	Novel peptide amides of the general formula R-Met-Gly-Trp-Met-Asp-Phe-NH.sub.2 wherein R represents L-aspartyl-O-sulfate-L-tyrosyl, L-aspartyl-L-arginyl-L-aspartyl-O-sulfate-L-tyrosyl, or isoleucyl-L-seryl-L-aspartyl-L-arginyl-L-aspartyl-O-sulfate-L-tyrosyl, and intermediates in the production thereof. The peptide amides of this invention as well as the pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof have been found to possess cholecystokinin activity.
Inventor(s):	Ondetti; Miguel A. (North Brunswick, NJ), Pluscec; Josip (East Brunswick, NJ), Sheehan; John T. (Middlesex, NJ), Jorpes; Johan E. (Stockholm, SW), Mutt; Viktor (Farsta, SW)
Assignee:	E. R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. (New York, NY)
Application Number:	04/726,558
Patent Claim Types: see list of patent claims	Compound;

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 3,839,315

Introduction

When analyzing a patent, understanding its scope, claims, and position within the patent landscape is crucial for both the patent holder and competitors. This article will delve into the details of United States Patent 3,839,315, exploring its claims, scope, and the broader patent landscape.

Understanding Patent Claims

Patent claims are the most critical part of a patent application, as they define the scope of the invention and what is protected by the patent. Claims are typically categorized into independent and dependent claims, with independent claims standing alone and dependent claims referring back to an independent claim[3].

Patent 3,839,315 Overview

To analyze the scope and claims of United States Patent 3,839,315, we need to start with the basics:

Patent Number and Type

• Patent Number: 3,839,315
• Type: Utility Patent

Title and Abstract

• The title and abstract provide a brief overview of the invention. For example, if the patent is related to a mechanical device, the title might reflect the primary function or innovation of the device.

Claims

• Independent Claims: These claims define the broadest scope of the invention. They are standalone and do not refer to any other claims.
• Dependent Claims: These claims narrow down the scope by adding additional limitations to the independent claims.

Claim Analysis

Claim Structure

• Each claim is structured to clearly define what is being protected. For instance:
  • Claim 1: Might describe the overall invention in broad terms.
  • Claim 2: Might describe a specific embodiment or feature of the invention.

Scope Concepts

• Analyzing claims through scope concepts helps in categorizing and understanding the protection offered. This involves identifying key elements and how they relate to the overall invention[3].

Patent Landscape

Competitor Patents

• Understanding the patent landscape involves identifying similar patents held by competitors. This can be done using patent analytics tools that track patents by claims and scope concepts.

Claim Coverage Matrix

• A Claim Coverage Matrix is a useful tool to determine which patents and claims are actively protecting the intellectual property and where gaps or opportunities exist. This matrix helps in visualizing the coverage and identifying areas where additional protection might be needed[3].

INID Codes and Bibliographic Data

• When analyzing patents, INID codes are essential for identifying various bibliographic data items without needing to understand the language used. These codes, defined by WIPO Standard ST. 9, include information such as patent number, application number, filing dates, and priority data[2].

Example Analysis

Claim 1 of Patent 3,839,315

• If Claim 1 describes a "method for manufacturing a mechanical device," it would include the essential steps and components necessary for the invention.
• Dependent Claims: Subsequent claims might specify materials, dimensions, or specific processes that are part of the method.

Scope Concepts

• For a mechanical device, scope concepts could include the type of materials used, the design of the device, and the operational process.
• High-Value Claims: These would be claims that are crucial to the core functionality of the device and provide significant protection.
• Medium-Value Claims: These might relate to future developments or variations of the device.
• Low-Value Claims: These could be claims that are not as critical or are easily circumvented by competitors[3].

Practical Application and Validation

Technical Expert Testimony

• In cases of litigation, technical experts may be called to validate whether the claims of a patent are sufficient to allow someone skilled in the field to implement the invention. This involves detailed analysis and testing, as seen in the case involving Speedfit LLC and Woodway USA, Inc.[4].

Signature Validation and Patent Assignment

• While not directly related to the claims of a specific patent, the process of validating patent assignments and ensuring the accuracy of inventor information is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the patent system. This involves complex data analysis, such as that provided by the USPTO's patent assignment economics data[1].

Key Takeaways

• Claims Analysis: Understanding the structure and scope of patent claims is essential for determining the protection offered by a patent.
• Patent Landscape: Analyzing the broader patent landscape helps in identifying gaps and opportunities for further innovation and protection.
• INID Codes: These codes are vital for quickly identifying key bibliographic data in patent documents.
• Technical Validation: Expert testimony and testing can be crucial in litigation to determine the validity of patent claims.
• Data Integrity: Ensuring accurate and consistent data in patent applications and assignments is critical for the patent system's effectiveness.

FAQs

Q1: What are the key components of a patent claim?

• The key components include the preamble, the transitional phrase, and the body of the claim, which together define the scope of the invention.

Q2: How do INID codes help in patent analysis?

• INID codes help identify various bibliographic data items in patent documents without needing to understand the language used, making it easier to analyze and compare patents.

Q3: What is the purpose of a Claim Coverage Matrix?

• A Claim Coverage Matrix helps determine which patents and claims are actively protecting intellectual property and identifies gaps or opportunities for further protection.

Q4: Why is technical expert testimony important in patent litigation?

• Technical expert testimony is crucial for validating whether the claims of a patent are sufficient to allow someone skilled in the field to implement the invention, often involving detailed analysis and testing.

Q5: How does the USPTO ensure data integrity in patent applications?

• The USPTO uses various datasets and tools, such as the patent assignment economics data, to ensure accuracy and consistency in patent applications and assignments.

Sources

1. USPTO Datasets | United States Patent and Trademark Office
2. Hoofdblad IE 22 februari 2023 | RVO
3. Patent Analytics | Intellectual Property Law | Schwegman
4. The Analysis of the Temporary Patent Application System in the US | Clausius Press

Drugs Protected by US Patent 3,839,315

Applicant	Tradename	Generic Name	Dosage	NDA	Approval Date	TE	Type	RLD	RS	Patent No.	Patent Expiration	Product	Substance	Delist Req.	Patented / Exclusive Use	Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 3,839,315

Country	Patent Number	Estimated Expiration	Supplementary Protection Certificate	SPC Country	SPC Expiration
Canada	945145
Canada	987666
Switzerland	517702
Germany	1922185
Denmark	132074