You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 3,855,140


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 3,855,140
Title: CLEANSING COMPOSITIONS
Abstract:The disclosure relates to cleansing compositions containing a soluble salt of chlorhexidine, a polyoxyethylenepolyoxypropylene block co-polymer and an inert diluent or carrier.
Inventor(s): Billany; Michael Royston (Macclesfield, EN), Longworth; Arthur Raymond (Macclesfield, EN), Shatwell; John (Macclesfield, EN)
Assignee: Imperial Chemical Industries Limited (London, EN)
Application Number:05/253,102
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of U.S. Patents: A Detailed Analysis

Introduction

Patents are a cornerstone of innovation, providing inventors and companies with the exclusive right to make, use, and sell their inventions. The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is responsible for granting these patents, and understanding the scope and claims of these patents is crucial for both inventors and businesses. This article delves into the patent landscape in the United States, focusing on the key aspects of patent scope, claims, and the broader patent ecosystem.

The Importance of Patents in Innovation

Patents are the creation of new, useful, and nonobvious goods, services, and processes. They are a significant source of innovation, driving technological advancement and economic growth. In the U.S., patents are issued to provide protection to inventions in the U.S. market, with foreign owners accounting for more than half of the patents granted by the USPTO in recent years[1].

Patent Scope and Claims

What are Patent Claims?

Patent claims define the scope of the invention for which protection is sought. They are the most critical part of a patent application, as they delineate what the inventor considers to be the novel and nonobvious aspects of the invention. The Patent Claims Research Dataset by the USPTO provides detailed information on claims from U.S. patents granted between 1976 and 2014, including claim-level statistics and document-level statistics[3].

Analyzing Patent Claims

The analysis of patent claims involves understanding the dependency relationships between claims, which can be complex. For instance, the USPTO's dataset includes individually-parsed claims and newly-developed measures of patent scope, such as the "patent scope" metric developed by Marco, Sarnoff, and deGrazia. This metric helps in quantifying the breadth and depth of patent protection[3].

Technology Areas and Patent Trends

Global and Cross-National Activity

The USPTO grants patents to inventors from around the world. In 2016, the USPTO granted more than 300,000 patents, with the United States receiving nearly half, followed by Japan and the European Union. Emerging economies like South Korea, China, Taiwan, and India have also seen significant increases in their patenting activity[1].

High-Technology and Knowledge-Intensive Industries

High-technology manufacturing and commercial knowledge-intensive services industries dominate the patent landscape. In 2015, U.S. high-technology manufacturing industries received 61% of the patents granted to U.S. manufacturing industries, while medium-high technology manufacturing industries received almost a quarter. Commercial knowledge-intensive services, particularly the information services industry, accounted for a significant portion of non-manufacturing patents[1].

Academic and University Patents

Trends in University Patenting

Universities play a vital role in patenting, with a focus on specific technical fields. In 2016, more than half of the patents granted to universities were in the fields of pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, medical technology, organic fine chemistry, and measurement. There has been significant growth in digital communications, microstructural and nanotechnology, and computer technology[1].

Foreign Universities and Patenting

Foreign universities have also increased their patenting activities. Between 2008 and 2016, the number of patents granted to foreign universities expanded rapidly, from 900 to over 4,200. This trend highlights the global nature of academic innovation[1].

Legal and Policy Considerations

Obviousness-Type Double Patenting (ODP)

Legal challenges such as obviousness-type double patenting (ODP) can affect the validity of patents. The case of In re Cellect, LLC illustrates how ODP can lead to the invalidation of patent claims if they are deemed unpatentable over earlier patents in the same family[2].

Small Claims Patent Court

There is ongoing discussion about the need for a small claims patent court to address the high costs and complexity associated with patent litigation. The Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS) has conducted a study on this topic, engaging with stakeholders and legal experts to explore the feasibility and structure of such a court[5].

Case Study: Patent JP-3855140-B2

While the query specifically asks about U.S. Patent 3,855,140, which is not directly available in the provided sources, we can draw parallels from other patents to understand the scope and claims.

Device Patents

Patents like JP-3855140-B2, which describe devices with movable parts, illustrate the complexity of patent claims. Such patents typically include detailed descriptions of the invention, claims that define the scope of the invention, and drawings that illustrate the device's components and their interactions[4].

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Claims: Define the scope of the invention and are crucial for understanding what is protected.
  • Technology Areas: High-technology manufacturing and commercial knowledge-intensive services dominate the patent landscape.
  • Global Trends: The USPTO grants patents to inventors worldwide, with significant contributions from the U.S., Japan, and the EU.
  • Academic Patents: Universities focus on specific technical fields, with growing trends in digital communications and nanotechnology.
  • Legal Considerations: ODP and other legal challenges can impact patent validity.
  • Policy Initiatives: Discussions around a small claims patent court aim to simplify and reduce the costs of patent litigation.

FAQs

What is the primary purpose of patent claims?

Patent claims define the scope of the invention for which protection is sought, outlining what the inventor considers novel and nonobvious.

Which industries dominate the U.S. patent landscape?

High-technology manufacturing and commercial knowledge-intensive services industries receive the majority of patents in the U.S.

How do foreign universities contribute to patenting activities?

Foreign universities have seen a rapid increase in their patenting activities, with over 4,200 patents granted in 2016, up from 900 in 2008.

What is obviousness-type double patenting (ODP)?

ODP is a legal challenge that can invalidate patent claims if they are deemed unpatentable over earlier patents in the same family.

Why is there a discussion about a small claims patent court?

The discussion aims to address the high costs and complexity associated with patent litigation by creating a simpler and more cost-effective legal process.

Sources

  1. National Science Foundation, "Chapter 8 - Invention, Knowledge Transfer, and Innovation," NSB 20181 Report, 2018.
  2. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, "In re Cellect, LLC," Case 22-1293, August 28, 2023.
  3. United States Patent and Trademark Office, "Patent Claims Research Dataset," USPTO Economic Research, August 28, 2017.
  4. PubChem, "Device having at least two parts movable relative to each other," JP-3855140-B2, accessed December 19, 2024.
  5. Administrative Conference of the United States, "U.S. Patent Small Claims Court," ACUS Research Projects, accessed December 19, 2024.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 3,855,140

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 3,855,140

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
United Kingdom28764/71Jun 18, 1971

International Family Members for US Patent 3,855,140

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Argentina 193103 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 4274672 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 459343 ⤷  Subscribe
Belgium 785049 ⤷  Subscribe
Canada 969442 ⤷  Subscribe
Germany 2229549 ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.