You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 3,998,966


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 3,998,966
Title: Anti-inflammatory, analgesic, anti-pyretic and anti-pruritic 6-substituted 2-naphthyl acetic acid derivative-containing compositions and methods of use thereof
Abstract:2-Naphthyl acetic acid derivatives and the corresponding amides, esters, hydroxamic acids and addition salts thereof, optionally substituted at the .alpha.-position on the acetic acid moiety and/or at position 6 and/or at positions 1, 4, 7 or 8 on the naphthyl ring and optionally saturated at positions 3 and 4, are anti-inflammatory, analgesic, anti-pyretic and anti-pruritic agents. A pharmaceutical method of effecting treatment of inflammation, pain, pyrexia and pruritus by the administration of naphthyl acetic acid derivatives. A pharmaceutical composition for use in the treatment of the above maladies comprising a naphthyl acetic acid derivative.
Inventor(s): Fried; John H. (Palo Alto, CA), Harrison; Ian T. (Palo Alto, CA)
Assignee: Syntex Corporation (Panama, PM)
Application Number:05/558,988
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 3,998,966

Introduction

United States Patent 3,998,966, though not directly provided in the search results, can be analyzed using general principles of patent law and the tools available for patent research. Here, we will delve into the components that typically define the scope and claims of a patent, and how these can be analyzed.

Understanding Patent Claims

Patent claims are the most critical part of a patent application, as they define the scope of the invention for which protection is sought. Claims are usually categorized into independent and dependent claims, with independent claims standing alone and dependent claims referring back to one or more of the independent claims[3].

Types of Claims

  • Independent Claims: These claims define the invention without reference to any other claims. They are the broadest claims in the patent and set the boundaries of the invention.
  • Dependent Claims: These claims refer back to one or more of the independent claims and narrow the scope of the invention. They often add additional features or limitations to the independent claims.

Claim Construction

The process of interpreting the meaning of patent claims is known as claim construction. This is crucial in determining the scope of the patent and is often a point of contention in patent litigation. The courts use various tools, including the patent specification, the prosecution history, and extrinsic evidence, to construe the claims[2].

Patent Scope and Landscape

Patent Scope

The scope of a patent is defined by its claims. A broader claim scope provides wider protection but also increases the risk of the claims being invalidated due to prior art. Narrower claims are more specific and less likely to be challenged but offer less protection.

Patent Landscape

The patent landscape refers to the overall environment of patents related to a particular technology or field. Analyzing the patent landscape involves identifying key patents, understanding the relationships between them, and determining the areas of innovation and competition.

Tools for Patent Analysis

Several tools and resources are available for analyzing patents:

USPTO Databases

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) provides extensive databases and tools for searching and analyzing patents. The Public Search Facility, Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs), and online databases such as the Patent Claims Research Dataset are invaluable resources[4].

Global Dossier

The Global Dossier service allows users to access the file histories of related applications from participating IP Offices, providing a comprehensive view of the patent family and related applications[4].

Common Citation Document (CCD)

The CCD application consolidates prior art cited by all participating offices for the family members of a patent application, helping to visualize the search results on a single page[4].

Analyzing Patent 3,998,966 Specifically

To analyze the scope and claims of United States Patent 3,998,966, you would typically follow these steps:

Retrieve the Patent Document

Obtain the full text of the patent from the USPTO database or other patent search platforms.

Review the Claims

Carefully read and analyze the independent and dependent claims to understand the scope of the invention.

Examine the Specification and Drawings

The specification and drawings provide context and details about the invention, which can help in interpreting the claims.

Check the Prosecution History

The prosecution history, including office actions and responses, can provide insights into how the claims were negotiated and any limitations or interpretations agreed upon during the patent application process.

Analyze Prior Art and Citations

Use tools like the CCD to identify prior art cited by the patent office and understand how the patent distinguishes itself from existing technology.

Legal and Practical Considerations

Validity and Infringement

Determine whether the patent claims are valid and if they have been infringed upon. This involves comparing the claims with prior art and assessing whether any other entity is practicing the invention without permission[2].

Enforcement and Litigation

If infringement is suspected, the patent holder may need to enforce their rights through litigation. Understanding the claim scope and landscape is crucial in building a strong case.

Key Takeaways

  • Claims Define Scope: The claims in a patent define the scope of the invention and are critical for determining protection and infringement.
  • Tools for Analysis: Utilize USPTO databases, Global Dossier, and CCD to analyze the patent landscape and scope.
  • Contextual Understanding: Review the specification, drawings, and prosecution history to fully interpret the claims.
  • Legal Considerations: Assess the validity and potential for infringement, and be prepared for litigation if necessary.

FAQs

  1. What are the key components of a patent claim?

    • Independent claims, dependent claims, and the specification and drawings that provide context.
  2. How do you determine the scope of a patent?

    • By interpreting the claims, reviewing the specification and drawings, and analyzing the prosecution history.
  3. What tools are available for analyzing the patent landscape?

    • USPTO databases, Global Dossier, Common Citation Document (CCD), and Patent Claims Research Dataset.
  4. Why is claim construction important?

    • It determines the meaning of the claims and thus the scope of the patent, which is crucial for infringement and validity assessments.
  5. How can you check for prior art citations for a patent?

    • Use the Common Citation Document (CCD) application to consolidate prior art cited by all participating offices.

Sources

  1. USPTO Patent Search: Find existing patents, published patent applications, and other published patent documentation[4].
  2. DDR Holdings - United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit: Insights into patent litigation and claim construction[2].
  3. Patent Claims Research Dataset - USPTO: Detailed information on claims from US patents and applications[3].
  4. USPTO Public Search Facility and Resources: Access to patent and trademark information in various formats[4].

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 3,998,966

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.