You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 4,038,389


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,038,389
Title: Medroxyprogesterone acetate compositions
Abstract:A pharmaceutical vehicle for parenteral administration of medroxyprogesterone acetate is disclosed comprising an aqueous solution of sodium sulfate, quaternary ammonium wetting agent, and a member selected from glycerin, propylene glycol, polyethylene glycol, and polypropylene glycol. The compositions may contain a non-ionic hydrophilic colloid as a preferred adjuvant. Compositions are useful for suspending large amounts, e.g., from 200 to 600 mg./ml. of medroxyprogesterone acetate and maintaining suitable suspendability and syringeability characteristics and are used for the known therapeutic indications for medroxyprogesterone acetate.
Inventor(s): Lamb; Donald J. (Portage, MI)
Assignee: The Upjohn Company (Kalamazoo, MI)
Application Number:05/671,918
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Dosage form; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 4,038,389: A Comprehensive Guide

Introduction

Understanding the scope and claims of a patent is crucial for navigating the complex landscape of intellectual property. This article will delve into the details of United States Patent 4,038,389, providing a thorough analysis of its claims, scope, and the broader patent landscape it inhabits.

Background of Patent 4,038,389

To begin, it is essential to identify the patent in question. However, since the specific details of U.S. Patent 4,038,389 are not provided in the sources, we will use general principles of patent analysis to guide our discussion.

Understanding Patent Claims

Patent claims are the heart of any patent application, defining the scope of protection granted to the inventor. Claims are typically categorized into independent and dependent claims. Independent claims stand alone and define the invention, while dependent claims refer back to and further limit the independent claims[5].

Claim Structure and Types

Independent Claims

Independent claims are broad and define the invention without reference to other claims. They are critical because they establish the outer boundaries of the patent's protection.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow down the invention by adding specific limitations to the independent claims. These claims are often used to provide additional protection against potential infringements by making the claims more specific.

Analyzing Claim Scope

The scope of patent claims determines what is protected and what is not. Here are some key aspects to consider:

Claim Language

The language used in claims is precise and technical. Each word and phrase has a specific meaning that can significantly impact the scope of protection. For example, terms like "comprising," "consisting of," and "including" have different implications on the breadth of the claim[5].

Claim Charts and Scope Concepts

Using tools like Claim Charts and scope concepts can help in visualizing and analyzing the claims. These charts categorize claims by overarching scope concepts, making it easier to identify gaps in coverage and potential future design opportunities[3].

Patent Landscape Analysis

Analyzing the patent landscape involves understanding the broader context in which the patent exists. This includes:

Prior Art Search

A prior art search is conducted by the patent examiner to ensure that the claims are novel and non-obvious. This search helps in identifying existing patents and publications that may affect the validity of the claims[5].

Competitor Patents

Identifying competitor patents in the same field can reveal potential infringement risks and opportunities for innovation. This involves categorizing patents by claims and scope concepts to understand the competitive landscape[3].

Patent Family Analysis

A patent family includes all the patents and patent applications that stem from a common priority application. Analyzing the patent family can provide insights into the evolution of the invention and the breadth of protection[4].

Case Study: Hypothetical Analysis of U.S. Patent 4,038,389

While specific details of U.S. Patent 4,038,389 are not available, here is a hypothetical analysis based on general principles:

Claim Analysis

  • Independent Claims: Identify the broad, standalone claims that define the invention.
  • Dependent Claims: Analyze the dependent claims to understand how they narrow down the invention.

Scope Determination

  • Claim Language: Examine the precise language used in the claims to understand the scope of protection.
  • Claim Charts: Use claim charts to visualize the scope concepts and identify any gaps or opportunities.

Patent Landscape

  • Prior Art: Review the prior art search results to understand how the patent examiner evaluated the novelty and non-obviousness of the claims.
  • Competitor Patents: Identify similar patents held by competitors to assess potential infringement risks and innovation opportunities.
  • Patent Family: Analyze the patent family to understand the evolution of the invention and the overall protection provided.

Tools and Resources for Patent Analysis

Several tools and resources are available to aid in patent analysis:

Patent Claims Research Dataset

The USPTO's Patent Claims Research Dataset provides detailed information on claims from U.S. patents and applications, including claim-level statistics and document-level statistics. This dataset can help in understanding trends and measurements of patent scope[2].

Claim Coverage Matrix

A Claim Coverage Matrix shows which patents and claims are actively protecting the intellectual property and where gaps or opportunities exist. This tool is particularly useful for managing large portfolios of patents[3].

Key Takeaways

  • Claims Are Central: Patent claims define the scope of protection and are the most critical part of a patent application.
  • Scope Analysis: Understanding the language and structure of claims is essential for determining the scope of protection.
  • Patent Landscape: Analyzing the broader patent landscape, including prior art, competitor patents, and patent families, is crucial for strategic decision-making.
  • Tools and Resources: Utilizing tools like the Patent Claims Research Dataset and Claim Coverage Matrix can enhance the efficiency and accuracy of patent analysis.

FAQs

What are the key components of a patent claim?

The key components include the preamble, the transition phrase, and the body of the claim. Each part plays a crucial role in defining the invention.

How do dependent claims differ from independent claims?

Dependent claims refer back to and further limit the independent claims, providing additional specificity and protection.

What is the purpose of a prior art search in patent examination?

A prior art search ensures that the patent claims are novel and non-obvious by identifying existing patents and publications that may affect the validity of the claims.

How can claim charts help in patent analysis?

Claim charts visualize the scope concepts of patent claims, making it easier to identify gaps in coverage and potential future design opportunities.

What is the significance of analyzing the patent family?

Analyzing the patent family provides insights into the evolution of the invention and the overall breadth of protection provided by the patents.

Sources

  1. Journal 2506 - Intellectual Property Office of Ireland. Retrieved from https://www.ipoi.gov.ie/en/ip-search-tools/search-the-journal/download-journals/journal-2506.pdf
  2. Patent Claims Research Dataset - USPTO. Retrieved from https://www.uspto.gov/ip-policy/economic-research/research-datasets/patent-claims-research-dataset
  3. Patent Analytics | Intellectual Property Law. Retrieved from https://www.slwip.com/services/patent-analytics/
  4. 20210114.xml - IP Australia. Retrieved from http://pericles.ipaustralia.gov.au/ols/epublish/content/journals/patents/20210114.xml
  5. US Patent Prosecution - Hayes Soloway, P.C.. Retrieved from https://www.hayes-soloway.com/patent-prosecution

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,038,389

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.