Share This Page
Details for Patent: 4,247,547
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Summary for Patent: 4,247,547
Title: | Tretinoin in a gel vehicle for acne treatment |
Abstract: | An acne treatment gel composition, effective at low concentrations of tretinoin, is provided for topical application. The composition is highly effective in treating acne conditions and is capable of being stored without refrigeration for long periods of time without losing therapeutic effectiveness and while maintaining the uniformity and stability of the gel. |
Inventor(s): | Marks; Alan M. (East Brunswick, NJ) |
Assignee: | Johnson & Johnson (New Brunswick, NJ) |
Application Number: | 06/022,022 |
Patent Claim Types: see list of patent claims | Formulation; Compound; Use; |
Patent landscape, scope, and claims: | Analyzing the Scope and Claims of a Patent: A Detailed Guide Using United States Patent 4,247,547 as an Example Introduction to Patent AnalysisPatent analysis is a crucial process for understanding the intellectual property landscape, identifying potential gaps or opportunities, and ensuring the enforceability of patents. This article will delve into the detailed analysis of the scope and claims of a patent, using United States Patent 4,247,547 as a case study. Understanding the Basics of Patent ClaimsPatent claims are the most critical part of a patent application, as they define the scope of the invention and what is protected by the patent. In the U.S., patent law requires that the "true and only" inventors be listed, and the claims must be clear and definite to permit one with ordinary skill in the field to reduce the invention to practice without undue experimentation[2]. Identifying the True and Only InventorsBefore diving into the claims, it is essential to ensure that the inventors listed are the correct ones. The conception of the idea is a key factor in determining inventorship. This involves identifying each person who conceived the idea or ideas of the patent claims. For example, in the case of United States Patent 4,247,547, the inventors would need to be those who conceived the specific invention described in the patent claims[2]. Locating and Accessing Patent InformationTo analyze a patent, one must first locate and access the patent documentation. The USPTO provides several tools for this purpose, including the Patent Public Search tool, which offers modern interfaces for enhanced access to prior art. Additionally, resources like the Global Dossier and Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs) can be invaluable for comprehensive patent searches[1]. Analyzing the Claims of United States Patent 4,247,547Claim StructurePatent claims are typically divided into independent and dependent claims. Independent claims stand alone and define the invention, while dependent claims refer back to and further limit the independent claims. Claim Coverage MatrixA Claim Coverage Matrix is a useful tool for analyzing which patents and claims are actively protecting the intellectual property. This matrix categorizes patents not only by claims but also by overarching scope concepts, allowing for a more efficient analysis of large numbers of patent claims[3]. Scope ConceptsFor United States Patent 4,247,547, the scope concepts would relate to the specific technology or method described in the patent. These concepts help in filtering, searching, and accurately analyzing the claims to determine their applicability to target products or methods. Evaluating the Patent LandscapeTracking Patents by Claims and Scope ConceptsTo understand the broader patent landscape, it is crucial to track patents by their claims and scope concepts. This involves categorizing patents based on their claims and the overarching concepts that link similar patents. For example, if United States Patent 4,247,547 pertains to a specific technological field, analyzing other patents within the same scope concepts can reveal gaps or opportunities in the current coverage[3]. Claim ChartsClaim charts generated by tools like ClaimScape® can be highly effective in reviewing patent coverage. These charts allow technical experts to determine whether a particular scope concept is applicable to a target product or method, highlighting areas where claim coverage may be lacking and identifying future design opportunities[3]. Identifying Gaps and OpportunitiesGap AnalysisA thorough analysis of the claims and scope concepts can help identify gaps in the current patent coverage. For instance, if United States Patent 4,247,547 covers a specific aspect of a technology, but other related aspects are not covered, this could indicate an opportunity for further innovation or additional patent filings. Future Design OpportunitiesThe claim charts and scope concepts can also highlight potential future design opportunities. By identifying areas where the current claim coverage is medium or low in value, companies can focus on developing new technologies or methods that could be highly valuable in the future[3]. Impact of Patent LitigationFactors Affecting Patent LitigationPatent litigation can significantly impact the enforceability and value of a patent. Factors such as changes in patent laws, like the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA), and the increasing number of lawsuits involving nonpracticing entities (NPEs) can affect the patent landscape. For example, the AIA limited the number of defendants in a lawsuit, leading to an increase in the number of lawsuits filed[4]. Linking Litigation Trends to Patent ExaminationThe USPTO has been recommended to link trends in patent infringement litigation to internal data on the patent examination process to improve the quality of issued patents. This can help in identifying potential issues with patent claims and ensuring that patents are more robust against future litigation[4]. Tools and Resources for Patent AnalysisUSPTO ResourcesThe USPTO offers several resources for patent analysis, including the Patent Public Search tool, Global Dossier, and the Patent Examination Data System (PEDS). These tools provide access to prior art, file histories of related applications, and bibliographic data for patent applications[1]. Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs)PTRCs are local resources that maintain search tools and offer training in patent search techniques. These centers can be invaluable for conducting thorough patent analyses and ensuring that all relevant prior art is considered[1]. Key Takeaways
FAQsQ: What is the importance of accurate inventorship in a patent application? A: Accurate inventorship is crucial because it ensures that the true and only inventors are listed, which is a requirement for the enforceability of the patent. Incorrect or incomplete identification of inventors can lead to challenges and potential invalidation of the patent[2]. Q: How do Claim Coverage Matrices help in patent analysis? A: Claim Coverage Matrices help by categorizing patents by claims and overarching scope concepts, making it easier to filter, search, and analyze large numbers of patent claims. This tool identifies which patents and claims are actively protecting the intellectual property and where gaps or opportunities exist[3]. Q: What is the role of the USPTO in patent analysis? A: The USPTO provides several tools and resources, such as the Patent Public Search tool, Global Dossier, and PTRCs, which are essential for conducting thorough patent searches and analyses. These resources help in accessing prior art, file histories, and bibliographic data for patent applications[1]. Q: How do changes in patent laws affect patent litigation? A: Changes in patent laws, such as the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA), can significantly impact patent litigation. For example, the AIA limited the number of defendants in a lawsuit, leading to an increase in the number of lawsuits filed. These changes can affect the strategy and outcomes of patent litigation[4]. Q: What is the significance of linking litigation trends to patent examination data? A: Linking litigation trends to patent examination data can help improve the quality of issued patents by identifying potential issues with patent claims. This integration can make patents more robust against future litigation and enhance the overall patent examination process[4]. Sources
More… ↓ |
Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,247,547
Applicant | Tradename | Generic Name | Dosage | NDA | Approval Date | TE | Type | RLD | RS | Patent No. | Patent Expiration | Product | Substance | Delist Req. | Patented / Exclusive Use | Submissiondate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
>Applicant | >Tradename | >Generic Name | >Dosage | >NDA | >Approval Date | >TE | >Type | >RLD | >RS | >Patent No. | >Patent Expiration | >Product | >Substance | >Delist Req. | >Patented / Exclusive Use | >Submissiondate |