Drugs covered by patent 4,329,364. Claims, international patent equivalents, patent expiration dates, and generic entry

Understanding the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 4,329,364

Introduction

Patent 4,329,364, issued on May 11, 1982, is a significant patent in the realm of technological innovation. To analyze its scope and claims, it is essential to delve into the patent's details, the context in which it was granted, and the broader patent landscape of the time.

Patent Overview

Invention Description

Patent 4,329,364 typically involves a specific invention or improvement in a particular field. While the exact details of this patent are not provided in the sources, a general approach to understanding any patent involves examining its abstract, claims, and detailed description.

Abstract and Claims

The abstract provides a brief summary of the invention, highlighting its key aspects. The claims section is crucial as it defines the scope of the invention and what is legally protected. Each claim must be clear, concise, and fully supported by the description[2].

Historical Context

Patent Era

Issued in 1982, this patent falls within a period of significant technological advancement. The late 20th century saw rapid developments in various fields, including electronics, software, and mechanical engineering. Understanding the historical context helps in appreciating the innovation and its impact.

Patent Search and Documentation

Accessing Historical Patents

To access and analyze historical patents like 4,329,364, several resources are available. The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) website provides full-text and images of patents from 1790 to the present. For patents prior to 1976, images and current classification numbers are available, while full text is accessible for patents from 1976 onwards[1].

Digests and Annual Reports

Historical patents can also be found through digests and annual reports from the Commissioner of Patents. These resources, available through the Hathi Trust, provide lists of patents arranged alphabetically by subject or chronologically by issue date[1].

Patent Claims Analysis

Claim Structure

Patent claims are the heart of any patent, defining what is protected. Claims can be independent or dependent, with dependent claims referring back to an independent claim. The structure and dependency of claims in Patent 4,329,364 would need to be carefully examined to understand the full scope of protection[3].

Patent Claims Research Dataset

For a deeper analysis, the USPTO's Patent Claims Research Dataset can be useful. This dataset, covering patents from 1976 to 2014, provides detailed information on claims, including claim-level statistics and dependency relationships. While this dataset may not include Patent 4,329,364 directly, it offers insights into how claims are structured and analyzed during this period[3].

Patent Quality and Examination

USPTO Quality Measures

The USPTO has developed measures to ensure patent quality, including compliance rates for various statutory requirements (35 U.S.C. 101, 112, 102, and 103). These measures help in understanding the rigor with which patents were examined during the time Patent 4,329,364 was granted[4].

Examination Time and Resources

The time and resources allocated to patent examinations can impact the quality and scope of patents. The USPTO has adjusted examination times for certain technology areas, reflecting the complexity and need for thorough examination in those fields[4].

Legal and Policy Considerations

Patent Eligibility

Patents must comply with the eligibility criteria under 35 U.S.C. § 101, which excludes laws of nature, natural phenomena, and abstract ideas. The Supreme Court's framework for distinguishing patentable subject matter is crucial in understanding whether the claims of Patent 4,329,364 meet these criteria[2].

Small Claims Patent Court

There have been discussions and studies on the feasibility of a small claims patent court, which could impact how patent disputes, including those related to older patents like 4,329,364, are handled. This could potentially simplify and reduce the costs associated with patent litigation[5].

Impact and Relevance

Technological Advancements

The invention protected by Patent 4,329,364 would have contributed to the technological advancements of its time. Understanding its impact involves looking at how it influenced subsequent innovations and whether it remains relevant in current technological landscapes.

Economic and Social Impact

Patents can have significant economic and social impacts. Analyzing the economic data and trends associated with patents from this era can provide insights into how Patent 4,329,364 fit into the broader economic and social context[3].

Key Takeaways

Historical Context: Understanding the historical context in which the patent was granted is crucial for appreciating its innovation and impact.
Patent Claims: Carefully analyzing the claims of the patent is essential for determining the scope of protection.
Patent Quality: Ensuring that the patent meets the quality and eligibility criteria set by the USPTO is vital.
Legal and Policy Considerations: Being aware of the legal and policy frameworks surrounding patents helps in understanding their validity and enforcement.
Impact and Relevance: Assessing the technological, economic, and social impact of the patent provides a comprehensive view of its significance.

FAQs

Q: How can I access the full text of historical U.S. patents like 4,329,364? A: The full text and images of U.S. patents from 1790 to the present are available on the USPTO website. For patents prior to 1976, images and current classification numbers are available, while full text is accessible for patents from 1976 onwards[1].

Q: What are the key components of a patent that define its scope? A: The key components include the abstract, detailed description, and claims. The claims section is particularly important as it defines what is legally protected[2].

Q: How does the USPTO ensure patent quality? A: The USPTO uses various measures, including compliance rates for statutory requirements and adjustments to examination times for complex technology areas, to ensure patent quality[4].

Q: Can abstract ideas be patented? A: No, abstract ideas are not patentable under 35 U.S.C. § 101. Patents must comply with the eligibility criteria set by this statute[2].

Q: What is the significance of a small claims patent court? A: A small claims patent court could simplify and reduce the costs associated with patent litigation, making it more accessible for smaller entities to enforce their patent rights[5].

Sources

How to Search for an Historical U.S. Patent - NYPL Libguides
MOBILE ACUITY LTD. v. BLIPPAR LTD.
Patent Claims Research Dataset - USPTO
Intellectual Property: Patent Office Should Define Quality, Reassess ... - GAO
U.S. Patent Small Claims Court - ACUS

Title:	Antiandrogenic agents and methods for the treatment of androgen dependent disease states
Abstract:	This application relates to treatment of prostatic carcinoma with 4'-nitro-3'-trifluoromethylisobutyranilide.
Inventor(s):	Neri; Rudolph O. (Hawthorne, NJ), Topliss; John G. (West Caldwell, NJ)
Assignee:	Schering Corporation (Kenilworth, NJ)
Application Number:	05/725,821
Patent Claim Types: see list of patent claims	Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:	Understanding the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 4,329,364 Introduction Patent 4,329,364, issued on May 11, 1982, is a significant patent in the realm of technological innovation. To analyze its scope and claims, it is essential to delve into the patent's details, the context in which it was granted, and the broader patent landscape of the time. Patent Overview Invention Description Patent 4,329,364 typically involves a specific invention or improvement in a particular field. While the exact details of this patent are not provided in the sources, a general approach to understanding any patent involves examining its abstract, claims, and detailed description. Abstract and Claims The abstract provides a brief summary of the invention, highlighting its key aspects. The claims section is crucial as it defines the scope of the invention and what is legally protected. Each claim must be clear, concise, and fully supported by the description[2]. Historical Context Patent Era Issued in 1982, this patent falls within a period of significant technological advancement. The late 20th century saw rapid developments in various fields, including electronics, software, and mechanical engineering. Understanding the historical context helps in appreciating the innovation and its impact. Patent Search and Documentation Accessing Historical Patents To access and analyze historical patents like 4,329,364, several resources are available. The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) website provides full-text and images of patents from 1790 to the present. For patents prior to 1976, images and current classification numbers are available, while full text is accessible for patents from 1976 onwards[1]. Digests and Annual Reports Historical patents can also be found through digests and annual reports from the Commissioner of Patents. These resources, available through the Hathi Trust, provide lists of patents arranged alphabetically by subject or chronologically by issue date[1]. Patent Claims Analysis Claim Structure Patent claims are the heart of any patent, defining what is protected. Claims can be independent or dependent, with dependent claims referring back to an independent claim. The structure and dependency of claims in Patent 4,329,364 would need to be carefully examined to understand the full scope of protection[3]. Patent Claims Research Dataset For a deeper analysis, the USPTO's Patent Claims Research Dataset can be useful. This dataset, covering patents from 1976 to 2014, provides detailed information on claims, including claim-level statistics and dependency relationships. While this dataset may not include Patent 4,329,364 directly, it offers insights into how claims are structured and analyzed during this period[3]. Patent Quality and Examination USPTO Quality Measures The USPTO has developed measures to ensure patent quality, including compliance rates for various statutory requirements (35 U.S.C. 101, 112, 102, and 103). These measures help in understanding the rigor with which patents were examined during the time Patent 4,329,364 was granted[4]. Examination Time and Resources The time and resources allocated to patent examinations can impact the quality and scope of patents. The USPTO has adjusted examination times for certain technology areas, reflecting the complexity and need for thorough examination in those fields[4]. Legal and Policy Considerations Patent Eligibility Patents must comply with the eligibility criteria under 35 U.S.C. § 101, which excludes laws of nature, natural phenomena, and abstract ideas. The Supreme Court's framework for distinguishing patentable subject matter is crucial in understanding whether the claims of Patent 4,329,364 meet these criteria[2]. Small Claims Patent Court There have been discussions and studies on the feasibility of a small claims patent court, which could impact how patent disputes, including those related to older patents like 4,329,364, are handled. This could potentially simplify and reduce the costs associated with patent litigation[5]. Impact and Relevance Technological Advancements The invention protected by Patent 4,329,364 would have contributed to the technological advancements of its time. Understanding its impact involves looking at how it influenced subsequent innovations and whether it remains relevant in current technological landscapes. Economic and Social Impact Patents can have significant economic and social impacts. Analyzing the economic data and trends associated with patents from this era can provide insights into how Patent 4,329,364 fit into the broader economic and social context[3]. Key Takeaways Historical Context: Understanding the historical context in which the patent was granted is crucial for appreciating its innovation and impact. Patent Claims: Carefully analyzing the claims of the patent is essential for determining the scope of protection. Patent Quality: Ensuring that the patent meets the quality and eligibility criteria set by the USPTO is vital. Legal and Policy Considerations: Being aware of the legal and policy frameworks surrounding patents helps in understanding their validity and enforcement. Impact and Relevance: Assessing the technological, economic, and social impact of the patent provides a comprehensive view of its significance. FAQs Q: How can I access the full text of historical U.S. patents like 4,329,364? A: The full text and images of U.S. patents from 1790 to the present are available on the USPTO website. For patents prior to 1976, images and current classification numbers are available, while full text is accessible for patents from 1976 onwards[1]. Q: What are the key components of a patent that define its scope? A: The key components include the abstract, detailed description, and claims. The claims section is particularly important as it defines what is legally protected[2]. Q: How does the USPTO ensure patent quality? A: The USPTO uses various measures, including compliance rates for statutory requirements and adjustments to examination times for complex technology areas, to ensure patent quality[4]. Q: Can abstract ideas be patented? A: No, abstract ideas are not patentable under 35 U.S.C. § 101. Patents must comply with the eligibility criteria set by this statute[2]. Q: What is the significance of a small claims patent court? A: A small claims patent court could simplify and reduce the costs associated with patent litigation, making it more accessible for smaller entities to enforce their patent rights[5]. Sources How to Search for an Historical U.S. Patent - NYPL Libguides MOBILE ACUITY LTD. v. BLIPPAR LTD. Patent Claims Research Dataset - USPTO Intellectual Property: Patent Office Should Define Quality, Reassess ... - GAO U.S. Patent Small Claims Court - ACUS More… ↓ ⤷ Try for Free

Applicant	Tradename	Generic Name	Dosage	NDA	Approval Date	TE	Type	RLD	RS	Patent No.	Patent Expiration	Product	Substance	Delist Req.	Patented / Exclusive Use	Submissiondate

No data available in table
>Applicant	>Tradename	>Generic Name	>Dosage	>NDA	>Approval Date	>TE	>Type	>RLD	>RS	>Patent No.	>Patent Expiration	>Product	>Substance	>Delist Req.	>Patented / Exclusive Use	>Submissiondate

Details for Patent: 4,329,364

Summary for Patent: 4,329,364