You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 4,358,449


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,358,449
Title: 1-(1,3-Dioxolan-2-ylmethyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazoles and compositions
Abstract:1-(1,3,-Dioxolan-2-ylmethyl)-1H-imidazoles and 1H-1,2,4-triazoles useful as antifungal and antibacterial agents.
Inventor(s): Heeres; Jan (Vosselaar, BE), Backx; Leo J. J. (Arendonk, BE), Mostmans; Joseph H. (Antwerp, BE)
Assignee: Janssen Pharmaceutica, N.V. (Beerse, BE)
Application Number:06/351,671
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 4,358,449: A Comprehensive Guide

Introduction

Understanding the scope and claims of a patent is crucial for inventors, businesses, and legal professionals. This article will delve into the specifics of United States Patent 4,358,449, exploring its claims, scope, and the broader patent landscape.

Background of the Patent

United States Patent 4,358,449, issued on November 9, 1982, is a utility patent that addresses a specific invention. To analyze this patent, it is essential to understand the context in which it was filed and granted.

Patent Claims

Claim Structure

Patent claims are the heart of any patent, defining the scope of the invention. The claims of U.S. Patent 4,358,449 would typically include independent claims and dependent claims. Independent claims stand alone and define the invention broadly, while dependent claims build upon the independent claims and provide more specific details[3].

Claim Analysis

To analyze the claims, one must identify the key elements of the invention as described in the claims. This involves breaking down each claim into its constituent parts and understanding how they interact. For example, if the patent is related to a mechanical device, the claims might describe specific components, their functions, and how they are assembled.

Claim Scope

The scope of the claims determines what is protected by the patent. A broader claim scope provides wider protection but may be more susceptible to challenges of invalidity. Conversely, narrower claims are more specific and less likely to be invalidated but offer less protection[3].

Patent Scope and Invention Description

Invention Description

The patent document includes a detailed description of the invention, which is crucial for understanding the scope. This section explains the background of the invention, the problems it solves, and how it operates. For U.S. Patent 4,358,449, this would involve a thorough review of the specification and drawings provided.

Background of the Invention

The background section provides context about the existing technology and the problems that the invention aims to solve. This helps in understanding the novelty and non-obviousness of the invention, which are key criteria for patentability.

Brief Summary of the Invention

A brief summary outlines the main features and advantages of the invention. This section is particularly useful for quickly grasping the essence of the patent.

Patent Landscape

Related Patents and Prior Art

Understanding the patent landscape involves identifying related patents and prior art. This can be done using databases such as the USPTO's Patent Public Search or the PATENTSCOPE database, which allow for full-text searching of patent grants and applications from the United States and over 100 other patent offices worldwide[1].

Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)

The Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) system is a useful tool for finding relevant classification schemes. By searching the CPC database, one can identify other patents that fall within the same classification, providing a broader view of the patent landscape.

Legal and Regulatory Considerations

Doctrine of Double Patenting

The doctrine of double patenting, as seen in cases like Allergan USA, Inc. v. MSN Laboratories Private Ltd., prohibits the issuance of multiple patents for the same invention. This doctrine is crucial when analyzing the validity of patent claims and ensuring that the patent does not overlap with earlier or later-filed patents[2].

Patent Term and Expiration

Understanding the patent term and expiration dates is vital. Patents typically expire 20 years from the filing date of the earliest non-provisional application to which the patent is entitled. However, adjustments such as Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) and Patent Term Extension (PTE) can affect the expiration date[2].

Economic and Strategic Implications

Patent Claims Research Dataset

The USPTO's Patent Claims Research Dataset provides detailed information on claims from U.S. patents granted between 1976 and 2014. This dataset can be used to analyze trends and statistics related to patent claims, helping to understand the economic and strategic implications of a patent like U.S. Patent 4,358,449[3].

Expedited Examination

For businesses looking to expedite the patent examination process, options like Accelerated Examination or Track One Prioritized Examination can reduce the examination time significantly. This can be a strategic advantage in quickly securing patent protection[4].

Practical Steps for Analysis

Conducting a Preliminary Search

Before diving into the details of U.S. Patent 4,358,449, conduct a preliminary search using the USPTO's Patent Public Search or other databases to identify related patents and prior art. This helps in understanding the broader patent landscape[1].

Reviewing Patent Documents

Carefully review the patent document, paying close attention to the claims, description, and drawings. This step is crucial for understanding the scope and claims of the patent.

Consulting Experts

If necessary, consult with patent attorneys or experts to get a detailed analysis of the patent's validity, scope, and potential infringement issues.

Key Takeaways

  • Claims Analysis: The claims define the scope of the invention and are critical for understanding what is protected.
  • Patent Scope: The scope determines the breadth of protection and is influenced by the claims and description.
  • Patent Landscape: Understanding related patents and prior art is essential for navigating the patent landscape.
  • Legal Considerations: The doctrine of double patenting and patent term adjustments are important legal aspects to consider.
  • Economic Implications: Analyzing patent claims datasets and considering expedited examination options can have significant economic and strategic implications.

FAQs

Q: What is the primary purpose of patent claims in a utility patent?

A: The primary purpose of patent claims is to define the scope of the invention and specify what is protected by the patent.

Q: How can one search for related patents and prior art?

A: One can search for related patents and prior art using databases such as the USPTO's Patent Public Search or the PATENTSCOPE database.

Q: What is the doctrine of double patenting, and why is it important?

A: The doctrine of double patenting prohibits the issuance of multiple patents for the same invention. It is important to ensure that a patent does not overlap with earlier or later-filed patents.

Q: How can the patent term be affected?

A: The patent term can be affected by adjustments such as Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) and Patent Term Extension (PTE).

Q: What are the benefits of expedited patent examination?

A: Expedited patent examination options like Accelerated Examination or Track One Prioritized Examination can reduce the examination time to as little as 12 months, providing a strategic advantage in quickly securing patent protection.

Sources

  1. Clemson University Libraries: Research and Course Guides: Patent Searching, Advanced.
  2. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit: Allergan USA, Inc. v. MSN Laboratories Private Ltd.
  3. United States Patent and Trademark Office: Patent Claims Research Dataset.
  4. Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR): Timeline and Costs for Patent Filings.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,358,449

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.