You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 4,410,520


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,410,520
Title: 3-Amino-[1]-benzazepin-2-one-1-alkanoic acids
Abstract:Variously substituted 1-carboxymethyl-3-(carboxymethylamino)-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-[1]benzazepin -2-ones and functional derivatives are angiotension converting enzyme inhibitors and are useful as antihypertensive agents. Synthesis of, compositions and methods of treatment utilizing such compounds are included.
Inventor(s): Watthey; Jeffrey W. H. (Chappaqua, NY)
Assignee: Ciba-Geigy Corporation (Ardsley, NY)
Application Number:06/398,241
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Process; Use; Composition; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of a Patent: A Detailed Analysis of United States Patent 4,410,520

Introduction

When analyzing a patent, it is crucial to understand its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape in which it exists. This article will delve into the specifics of United States Patent 4,410,520, providing a comprehensive analysis of its claims, scope, and the context within the U.S. patent system.

What is a Patent?

Before diving into the specifics of U.S. Patent 4,410,520, it's essential to understand what a patent is. A patent is a form of intellectual property that grants the owner the exclusive right to make, use, sell, and distribute an invention for a certain period, typically 20 years from the filing date of the patent application[4].

The Importance of Patent Claims

Patent claims are the heart of a patent, defining the scope of protection granted by the patent. They outline what the inventor considers to be the novel and non-obvious aspects of the invention. The claims must be clear, concise, and supported by the patent's description and drawings[4].

United States Patent 4,410,520: Overview

To analyze U.S. Patent 4,410,520, one would typically start by identifying the patent's title, inventors, filing and grant dates, and the assigned classification. However, since the specific details of this patent are not provided in the sources, we will focus on the general process of analyzing a patent.

Title and Abstract

The title and abstract provide a brief summary of the invention. The title should be descriptive and concise, while the abstract gives a more detailed overview of the invention's purpose and key features.

Background of the Invention

This section explains the context in which the invention was developed, including any prior art and the problems the invention aims to solve. Understanding this background is crucial for grasping the invention's significance and the scope of the claims.

Summary of the Invention

The summary section provides a more detailed description of the invention, highlighting its key features and how it operates. This section is important for understanding the inventor's intent and the scope of the claims.

Detailed Description of the Invention

This is the most comprehensive part of the patent, where the inventor describes the invention in detail, often with the aid of drawings and diagrams. Here, the inventor explains how the invention works, its components, and any variations or embodiments.

Claims

The claims section is where the inventor defines the scope of the patent. Claims can be independent or dependent, with independent claims standing alone and dependent claims referring back to an independent claim. The claims must be clear and specific to ensure that the patent's scope is well-defined[4].

Analyzing the Claims of U.S. Patent 4,410,520

Claim Structure

  • Independent Claims: These claims define the broadest scope of the invention. They should be self-contained and not refer to any other claims.
  • Dependent Claims: These claims narrow down the scope of the invention by adding additional limitations to an independent claim.

Claim Language

The language used in the claims is critical. It must be precise and avoid ambiguity to ensure that the scope of the patent is clear. Claims that are too broad may be rejected during the examination process, while claims that are too narrow may not provide adequate protection.

Scope of the Patent

The scope of a patent is determined by its claims. It defines what is protected and what is not. The scope can be influenced by various factors, including the description and drawings provided in the patent, as well as any prior art cited during the examination process.

Patent Scope Measurements

The USPTO has developed measures to analyze patent scope, including the Patent Claims Research Dataset. This dataset provides detailed information on claims from U.S. patents and applications, helping to understand the scope and complexity of patents[3].

Patent Landscape Analysis

Understanding the broader patent landscape is essential for assessing the value and relevance of a patent.

Prior Art

Prior art refers to any publicly available information that existed before the filing date of the patent application. Analyzing prior art helps in determining the novelty and non-obviousness of the invention.

Related Patents

Identifying related patents involves searching for other patents in the same field or with similar claims. Tools like the Patent Public Search, Global Dossier, and Common Citation Document (CCD) are invaluable for this purpose[4].

Market and Economic Impact

The value of a patent can also be assessed by its market and economic impact. This includes analyzing the income generated by the patent, the cost of development, and the market demand for the invention. Valuation methods such as the cost, income, and market approaches can be used to determine the patent's worth[1].

Valuation of Patents

Cost Approach

This method values a patent based on the cost of developing it. Since patents cannot be developed retroactively, this approach considers the actual costs incurred during the development process[1].

Income Approach

This method values a patent based on the future income or savings it is expected to generate. It calculates the present value of these future benefits over the patent's lifetime[1].

Market Approach

This method values a patent based on what a willing buyer would pay for a similar asset. It uses sales and asking price data from similar patent transactions[1].

Case Studies: High-Value Patents

  • Novell and Nortel Deals: In 2010, CPTN Holdings paid $450 million for 882 patents and applications from Novell, at $510,204.08 per patent. Similarly, Rockstar Bidco paid $4.5 billion for 6,000 patent documents from Nortel, at $750,000 per document[1].

Key Takeaways

  • Clear Claims: The claims of a patent must be clear, concise, and supported by the description and drawings.
  • Scope Definition: The scope of a patent is defined by its claims and can be influenced by prior art and the broader patent landscape.
  • Valuation Methods: Patents can be valued using the cost, income, and market approaches.
  • Market Impact: The value of a patent is also determined by its market and economic impact.

FAQs

What is the primary purpose of patent claims?

The primary purpose of patent claims is to define the scope of protection granted by the patent, outlining what the inventor considers to be the novel and non-obvious aspects of the invention.

How do you determine the scope of a patent?

The scope of a patent is determined by its claims, which must be clear and specific. The description and drawings provided in the patent, as well as any prior art cited during the examination process, also influence the scope.

What are the common methods for valuing a patent?

The common methods for valuing a patent include the cost approach (based on development costs), the income approach (based on future income or savings), and the market approach (based on what a willing buyer would pay for a similar asset)[1].

Why is prior art important in patent analysis?

Prior art is important because it helps determine the novelty and non-obviousness of the invention. It ensures that the patent does not cover existing knowledge or inventions.

What tools are available for searching and analyzing patents?

Tools such as the Patent Public Search, Global Dossier, Common Citation Document (CCD), and Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs) are available for searching and analyzing patents[4].

Sources

  1. The Value of a Patent - Perpetual Motion Patents
  2. US-20020183308-A1 - Unified Patents Portal
  3. Patent Claims Research Dataset - USPTO
  4. Search for Patents - USPTO

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,410,520

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 4,410,520

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Argentina 240806 ⤷  Subscribe
Argentina 240807 ⤷  Subscribe
Argentina 241222 ⤷  Subscribe
Argentina 242190 ⤷  Subscribe
Argentina 242191 ⤷  Subscribe
Argentina 242564 ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.