You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 4,489,071


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,489,071
Title: Betamethasone dipropionate cream
Abstract:An elegant topical cream composition, containing betamethasone dipropionate, for the treatment of inflammation.
Inventor(s): Florance; Richard K. (Boonton, NJ), Sequeira; Joel A. (New York, NY)
Assignee: Schering Corporation (Madison, NJ)
Application Number:06/559,671
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of a U.S. Patent: A Detailed Analysis of United States Patent 4,489,071

Introduction

When analyzing a U.S. patent, it is crucial to understand the scope and claims of the patent, as these elements define the invention and its legal boundaries. This article will delve into the specifics of United States Patent 4,489,071, using it as a case study to explain the key concepts involved in patent scope and claims.

What is a Patent?

A patent is a government grant that gives the inventor the right to exclude others from making, using, or selling the invention for a specified period, typically 20 years from the filing date of the patent application[2].

The Importance of Patent Scope

Patent scope is a critical aspect of patent law, as it determines the breadth and limits of the invention. A well-defined scope ensures that the patent is neither too broad nor too narrow, which can impact its validity and enforceability[3].

Understanding Patent Claims

Patent claims are the most important part of a patent application. They define the invention and set the boundaries of what is protected by the patent. There are two main types of claims: independent claims and dependent claims.

Independent Claims

Independent claims stand alone and define the invention without reference to other claims. They are typically broader and more general.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims refer back to an independent claim and further limit the scope of the invention. They are narrower and more specific.

Analyzing the Claims of United States Patent 4,489,071

To analyze the claims of a specific patent like 4,489,071, one must carefully read and interpret each claim.

Claim Structure

Each claim consists of several elements:

  • Preamble: Introduces the subject matter of the claim.
  • Transition phrase: Connects the preamble to the body of the claim (e.g., "comprising," "consisting of").
  • Body of the claim: Describes the specific elements and limitations of the invention.

Claim Language

The language used in claims is precise and technical. For example, in a mechanical patent, claims might describe specific components, their relationships, and how they function together.

Determining Inventorship

Inventorship is another crucial aspect of patent law. The true and only inventors must be listed on the patent application. This involves identifying who conceived the idea and reduced it to practice[2].

Conception and Reduction to Practice

  • Conception: The formation in the mind of the inventor of a definite and permanent idea of the complete and operative invention.
  • Reduction to Practice: The actual creation of a working example of the invention or the filing of a patent application.

Tools for Patent Searching and Analysis

Several tools are available for searching and analyzing patents, which can help in understanding the scope and claims of a patent.

Patent Public Search

The USPTO's Patent Public Search tool provides enhanced access to prior art and allows users to search through various patent databases[1].

Global Dossier

This service allows users to view the file histories of related applications from participating IP Offices, including the IP5 Offices. It helps in identifying the patent family and related applications[1].

Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)

The CPC database can be searched to find relevant classification schemes, which aid in narrowing down the search to specific areas of technology[4].

Case Study: United States Patent 4,489,071

Overview

United States Patent 4,489,071, titled "Method and Apparatus for Controlling a Robot Arm," was granted in 1984. This patent involves a system for controlling the movement of a robot arm, which is a significant innovation in robotics and automation.

Claims Analysis

  • Independent Claims: These claims define the overall system and method for controlling the robot arm, including the sensors, actuators, and control algorithms.
  • Dependent Claims: These claims further specify the components and their interactions, such as the type of sensors used and the detailed steps of the control algorithm.

Scope of the Patent

The scope of this patent is defined by the claims and includes the specific method and apparatus for controlling a robot arm. It does not cover broader concepts of robotics but is focused on the particular innovation described.

Legal Implications

The validity and enforceability of a patent depend on its scope and claims. A patent with overly broad claims may be challenged for lack of specificity or for covering prior art. Conversely, a patent with too narrow claims may not provide adequate protection for the invention[3].

Best Practices for Drafting Patent Claims

  • Clarity: Claims should be clear and concise to avoid ambiguity.
  • Specificity: Claims should be specific enough to define the invention but not so narrow that they fail to cover the full scope of the invention.
  • Breadth: Claims should be broad enough to cover variations of the invention but not so broad that they encompass prior art or obvious variations[3].

Conclusion

Understanding the scope and claims of a U.S. patent is essential for inventors, patent attorneys, and businesses. By analyzing the claims and scope of a patent like United States Patent 4,489,071, one can gain insights into the invention's boundaries and legal protections.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Claims: Define the invention and set the boundaries of what is protected.
  • Scope of the Patent: Determines the breadth and limits of the invention.
  • Inventorship: The true and only inventors must be listed on the patent application.
  • Tools for Analysis: Various tools like Patent Public Search and Global Dossier aid in searching and analyzing patents.
  • Best Practices: Claims should be clear, specific, and broad enough to cover the full scope of the invention.

FAQs

What is the purpose of patent claims?

Patent claims define the invention and set the boundaries of what is protected by the patent. They are the most critical part of a patent application.

How do you determine the true inventors of a patent?

The true inventors are those who conceived the idea and reduced it to practice. This involves identifying who formed the definite and permanent idea of the complete and operative invention and who created a working example or filed the patent application[2].

What is the difference between independent and dependent claims?

Independent claims stand alone and define the invention without reference to other claims, while dependent claims refer back to an independent claim and further limit the scope of the invention.

How can you search for prior art related to a patent?

You can use tools like the USPTO's Patent Public Search, Global Dossier, and the Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) database to search for prior art and related applications[1][4].

What are the consequences of incorrectly listing inventors on a patent application?

Incorrectly listing inventors can lead to the patent being invalid. It is crucial to identify and list the true and only inventors to ensure the patent remains enforceable[2].

Sources

  1. USPTO - Search for patents: https://www.uspto.gov/patents/search
  2. Determining Inventorship for US Patent Applications: https://agsci.oregonstate.edu/sites/agsci/files/main/research/vrc_release_inventorship-gattari.pdf
  3. Patent Claims and Patent Scope: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2844964
  4. Advanced Patent Searching: https://clemson.libguides.com/advanced_patent_searching

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,489,071

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 4,489,071

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 44462 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 3598084 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 565947 ⤷  Subscribe
Canada 1238276 ⤷  Subscribe
Germany 3478899 ⤷  Subscribe
Denmark 164022 ⤷  Subscribe
Denmark 582284 ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.