You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 3, 2025

Details for Patent: 4,804,666


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,804,666
Title: Antiallergic 6,11-dihydro-11-(4-piperidylidene)-5H-benzo(5,6)cyclohepta(1,2-B)pyridin es
Abstract:Derivatives of 6,11-dihydro-11-(4-piperidylidene)-5H-benzo[5,6]cyclohepta[1,2-b]pyridine, and pharmaceutically acceptable salts and solvates thereof are disclosed, which possess anti-allergic activity, making them effective as anti-allergic compounds. Methods for preparing and using the compounds are also described.
Inventor(s): Piwinski; John J. (Parsippany, NJ), Green; Michael J. (Skillman, NJ), Ganguly; Ashit K. (Upper Montclair, NJ), Wong; Jesse K. (Union, NJ), Katchen; Bernard (Livingston, NJ), Cramer; Jeffrey (Westfield, NJ)
Assignee: Schering Corporation (Kenilworth, NJ)
Application Number:07/043,409
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Composition; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 4,804,666

Introduction

When analyzing a patent, particularly one like United States Patent 4,804,666, it is crucial to delve into its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape. This analysis helps in understanding the patent's validity, its impact on the industry, and potential legal implications.

Patent Overview

United States Patent 4,804,666, though not specifically detailed in the provided sources, can be analyzed using general principles of patent law and search methodologies.

Patent Search and Retrieval

To begin, one must locate the patent document. The USPTO website and other databases like Google Patents, Espacenet, and PATENTSCOPE are invaluable resources for retrieving patent documents, including full text and images[1][4].

Patent Claims Analysis

Claim Structure

Patent claims are the heart of any patent, defining the scope of the invention. Claims can be independent or dependent, with independent claims standing alone and dependent claims referring back to an independent claim. The number and length of independent claims can provide insights into the patent's scope and complexity[3].

Claim Scope Metrics

Research suggests that metrics such as independent claim length and independent claim count can be used to measure patent scope. Narrower claims are often associated with a higher probability of grant and a shorter examination process[3].

Patent Scope and Validity

Abstract Ideas and Patent Eligibility

The validity of a patent can be challenged if its claims are directed to abstract ideas, which are not patent-eligible under 35 U.S.C. ยง 101. The Alice test is a two-step process used to determine if a claim is patent-eligible. Step one involves determining if the claim is directed to an abstract idea, and step two assesses whether the claim contains an inventive step that transforms the abstract idea into a patent-eligible invention[2].

Prior Art and Novelty

The scope of a patent is also influenced by prior art. Patents must be novel and non-obvious over existing prior art. Searching historical patents, such as those listed in the "Name and Date Patents" index from 1790 to 1836, can help in determining the novelty of an invention[1].

Classification and Indexing

Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)

The Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) system is a widely used classification scheme that helps in categorizing patents. Searching by CPC can aid in identifying relevant patents and understanding the broader technological landscape[4].

Subject-Matter Index

Historical patents can be indexed by subject matter, as seen in the "Subject-Matter Index of Patents" from 1790 to 1873. This indexing helps in locating patents related to specific inventions and understanding the evolution of technologies over time[1].

Legal and Policy Considerations

Small Claims Patent Court

The concept of a small claims patent court has been explored to address issues related to patent litigation costs and accessibility. Such a court could potentially impact the enforcement and validity of patents, including those with narrower scopes like U.S. Patent 4,804,666[5].

Industry Impact and Innovation

Patent Quality and Innovation

The scope and claims of a patent can influence innovation within an industry. Broader patents with decreased clarity can lead to increased licensing and litigation costs, potentially diminishing innovation incentives. Conversely, narrower, well-defined patents can foster a more innovative environment[3].

Forward Citations and Patent Maintenance

The number of forward citations and patent maintenance payments can indicate the significance and impact of a patent. Patents with more forward citations and higher maintenance payments are often seen as more valuable and influential in their field[3].

Case Studies and Litigation

Patent Infringement and Eligibility Challenges

Patents can be challenged in court for infringement or eligibility. Cases like AI Visualize, Inc. v. Nuance Communications, Inc. illustrate how courts apply the Alice test to determine patent eligibility. Understanding such cases can provide insights into how the scope and claims of a patent might be scrutinized in legal proceedings[2].

Tools and Resources for Patent Analysis

USPTO and International Databases

The USPTO's Patent Public Search database, PATENTSCOPE, and Espacenet are essential tools for conducting comprehensive patent searches. These resources allow for full-text searching and provide access to international patent applications and grants[1][4].

Training and Guides

The USPTO and other institutions offer training materials and guides to help with patent searching and analysis. These resources are crucial for navigating the complex landscape of patent law and ensuring thorough analysis of patent scope and claims[4].

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Claims: The scope of a patent is defined by its claims, which must be carefully analyzed to understand the invention's boundaries.
  • Patent Eligibility: Claims must pass the Alice test to ensure they are not directed to abstract ideas and contain an inventive step.
  • Prior Art and Classification: Understanding prior art and using classification systems like CPC are vital for determining novelty and relevance.
  • Legal and Policy Implications: The legal and policy environment, including potential small claims patent courts, can impact patent enforcement and validity.
  • Industry Impact: The scope and clarity of patents influence innovation and industry dynamics.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: How do I locate a specific U.S. patent document?

A: You can locate a specific U.S. patent document using the USPTO website, Google Patents, or other databases like Espacenet and PATENTSCOPE.

Q: What is the significance of the Alice test in patent law?

A: The Alice test is a two-step process used to determine if a patent claim is directed to an abstract idea and whether it contains an inventive step that transforms the abstract idea into a patent-eligible invention.

Q: How do independent claim length and count affect patent scope?

A: Narrower claims, as measured by independent claim length and count, are often associated with a higher probability of grant and a shorter examination process.

Q: What is the Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) system?

A: The CPC system is a classification scheme used to categorize patents, aiding in the identification of relevant patents and understanding the broader technological landscape.

Q: Why is the concept of a small claims patent court being explored?

A: The concept of a small claims patent court is being explored to address issues related to patent litigation costs and accessibility, potentially making patent enforcement more accessible and affordable.

Cited Sources

  1. NYPL Libguides: "How to Search for an Historical U.S. Patent"
  2. CAFC: "AI VISUALIZE, INC. v. NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC."
  3. SSRN: "Patent Claims and Patent Scope"
  4. Clemson Libguides: "Research and Course Guides: Patent Searching, Advanced: Overview"
  5. ACUS: "U.S. Patent Small Claims Court"

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,804,666

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 4,804,666

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Argentina 246520 ⤷  Subscribe
Austria 80394 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 1046588 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 612339 ⤷  Subscribe
Canada 1332172 ⤷  Subscribe
Germany 3781679 ⤷  Subscribe
Denmark 540789 ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.