You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 4,859,660


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,859,660
Title: Method of treating cirrhosis
Abstract:A method of treating primary biliary cirrhosis comprising administering ursodeoxycholic acid to a patient suffering therefrom.
Inventor(s): Poupon; Raoul (Paris, FR)
Assignee: Synthelabo (Paris, FR)
Application Number:07/122,867
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Delivery; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of a U.S. Patent: A Detailed Analysis of U.S. Patent 4,859,660

Introduction

When analyzing a U.S. patent, it is crucial to understand the scope and claims of the patent, as these elements define the intellectual property rights granted to the inventor. This article will delve into the specifics of U.S. Patent 4,859,660, exploring its claims, the patent landscape, and the tools and methods used in patent analysis.

What is U.S. Patent 4,859,660?

To begin, let's identify the patent in question. U.S. Patent 4,859,660 is a utility patent granted by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Utility patents are the most common type of patent and cover new and useful processes, machines, manufactures, or compositions of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof[5].

The Importance of Patent Claims

The claims section of a patent application is essential because it defines the scope of the patent's protection. These claims must be clear, concise, and definite to ensure that the patent holder's rights are well-defined and enforceable[5].

Claim Structure

  • Independent Claims: These claims stand alone and define the invention without reference to other claims.
  • Dependent Claims: These claims refer back to and further limit an independent claim.
  • Method Claims: These claims describe a process or method.
  • Apparatus Claims: These claims describe a device or system.

For U.S. Patent 4,859,660, one would need to review the specific claims listed in the patent document to understand the exact scope of protection.

Analyzing the Patent Landscape

Analyzing the patent landscape involves understanding the broader context in which the patent exists. This includes identifying related patents, determining gaps in coverage, and assessing the competitive environment.

Tools for Patent Landscape Analysis

Several tools and databases are available for conducting a thorough patent landscape analysis:

  • USPTO's Patent Public Search: This database allows for full-text searching of U.S. patent grants and applications, as well as searching by Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)[4].
  • PATENTSCOPE: Provided by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), this database offers access to international Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) applications and patent documents from national and regional patent offices[4].
  • Google Patents: A free resource that provides access to patents from around the world, including the USPTO[1].

Claim Coverage Matrix

A Claim Coverage Matrix is a valuable tool in patent analytics. It categorizes patents by claims and scope concepts, helping to identify which patents and claims are actively protecting the intellectual property and where gaps or opportunities exist. This matrix can be generated using software like ClaimScape®, which provides interactive claim charts for review by technical experts[3].

Determining Inventorship

Inventorship is a critical aspect of patent law. The true and only inventors must be listed in the patent application. This involves identifying who conceived the idea and who reduced it to practice[2].

Steps in Determining Inventorship

  1. Conception of the Idea: This involves the mental formulation of the invention.
  2. Reduction to Practice: This involves either building and testing the invention (actual reduction to practice) or filing a patent application (constructive reduction to practice)[2].

Historical Context of Patents

Understanding the historical context of patents can provide insights into the evolution of inventions and intellectual property protection. For example, early U.S. patents issued from 1790 to 1836 are known as "X" patents and were retrospectively numbered. These patents can be found in resources such as the "Digest of Patents: 1790 to 1839" available through the Hathi Trust[1].

Advanced Patent Searching

Advanced patent searching involves using various databases and classification systems to find relevant patents. The Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) database is particularly useful for this purpose, allowing for searches across multiple patent offices worldwide[4].

Worldwide Databases

  • European Patent Office's Espacenet: Provides access to patent documents from over 100 patent-granting authorities.
  • WIPO's PATENTSCOPE: Offers full-text access to PCT applications and patent documents from participating national and regional patent offices[4].

Patent Prosecution Process

After filing a patent application, it undergoes a review process by a patent examiner. The examiner checks the application, including the claims, for compliance with legal requirements and conducts a prior art search to determine if the invention is useful, novel, and non-obvious. If the invention is found patentable, a patent is granted; otherwise, the applicant receives an Office Action detailing the reasons for rejection[5].

Key Takeaways

  • Claims Define Protection: The claims section of a patent is crucial as it defines the scope of protection.
  • Patent Landscape Analysis: Tools like Claim Coverage Matrix and databases such as USPTO's Patent Public Search and PATENTSCOPE are essential for understanding the broader patent landscape.
  • Inventorship: Correctly determining the true and only inventors is vital for the validity of the patent.
  • Advanced Searching: Utilizing advanced searching techniques and databases helps in identifying relevant patents and gaps in coverage.
  • Prosecution Process: Understanding the patent prosecution process is key to navigating the complexities of obtaining a patent.

FAQs

Q: What is the significance of claims in a patent application?

A: Claims define the scope of the patent's protection and must be clear, concise, and definite to ensure enforceable rights.

Q: How do I determine the true and only inventors for a patent application?

A: Determining inventorship involves identifying who conceived the idea and who reduced it to practice, ensuring that only those who contributed to the invention are listed.

Q: What tools are available for conducting a patent landscape analysis?

A: Tools include the USPTO's Patent Public Search, PATENTSCOPE, Google Patents, and Claim Coverage Matrix generated by software like ClaimScape®.

Q: What is the difference between a provisional and non-provisional patent application?

A: A provisional application allows for an early filing date with fewer formal requirements, while a non-provisional application must be filed within 12 months, complying with all statutory requirements.

Q: How does the patent prosecution process work?

A: After filing, a patent examiner reviews the application, including claims, for compliance with legal requirements and conducts a prior art search. If the invention is patentable, a patent is granted; otherwise, an Office Action is issued detailing reasons for rejection.

Sources

  1. NYPL Libguides: How to Search for an Historical U.S. Patent.
  2. Oregon State University: Determining Inventorship for US Patent Applications.
  3. Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner: Patent Analytics.
  4. Clemson University Libguides: Advanced Patent Searching.
  5. The Maryland People's Law Library: Patents.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,859,660

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 4,859,660

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
France86 16139Nov 20, 1986

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.